Top 10 Bland AI Alternatives for AI Cold Calling

Alternatives
Keith Fearon
Written by 
Keith Fearon
Published on 
Aug 21, 2025
 min read

https://www.11x.ai/sales-tools/blandai

Many people use Bland AI for good reasons. It's a capable tool for automating phone calls, like setting appointments or initial outreach. For high-volume communication, it can be an effective and time-saving solution.

However, like any tool, it has limits. Some users find reliability and ease of use can be concerns, prompting a search for alternatives. We've analyzed top options based on G2 reviews to help you compare and choose the right fit. Let's get started.

Consider 11x For Your Sales Team

If your sales process requires more than automated calls, consider 11x. It provides digital workers to handle specific sales tasks. This approach can be a good fit for teams that want to augment their sales force with specialized support.

At 11x, we provide a GTM platform where AI agents manage the sales process. Our agent, Alice, finds prospects, handles outreach on email and LinkedIn, and keeps the CRM updated. Julian qualifies inbound leads and books meetings for the sales team.

This approach means you do not need separate solutions for data enrichment, sales outreach, or email warmup. We combine these functions into a single platform.

Bland AI Alternatives

This section provides a detailed look at top Bland AI alternatives. For each option, we analyze pricing, core features, and how it stacks up against Bland AI in terms of benefits and potential drawbacks.

1) Twilio

Twilio

Twilio is a customer engagement platform that combines communication APIs, AI, and a customer data platform. It provides tools for personalized interactions across voice, messaging, and email. For sales, it supports data-driven contact centers and AI-enabled IVR.

The platform offers programmable voice for custom call solutions and uses its data capabilities to inform outreach. It operates on a pay-as-you-go model with a free trial.

Twilio's Main Features

  • Provides multichannel communication APIs for SMS, WhatsApp, voice, email, and video.
  • Includes a customer data platform (Segment) for unified customer profiles and real-time data pipelines.
  • Offers serverless functions, a visual builder, and SDKs for languages like Python, Java, and JavaScript.
  • Delivers user authentication and identity services, including two-factor authentication and real-time phone intelligence.

How Twilio Compares To Bland AI

Average Review score: 4.2/5 stars based on 482 G2 reviews.

  • Twilio provides multichannel communication APIs for SMS, WhatsApp, and email, while Bland AI primarily handles automated voice calls. This allows for broader customer outreach.
  • It offers more extensive developer tools, including SDKs and serverless functions. This gives teams greater flexibility to build custom solutions compared to Bland AI's focused call automation.
  • The platform includes a customer data platform (Segment) for unified customer profiles. This feature enables more personalized interactions than the standard data handling in Bland AI.
  • This tool delivers built-in security features like two-factor authentication. This adds a layer of identity verification not found in Bland AI's core product.

Where Twilio May Not Be The Best Fit

  • Twilio's setup can be more involved compared to Bland AI. Some users note an implementation time of around two months because it is a broad developer platform, not a dedicated call automation tool.
  • The platform's pay-as-you-go model might become costly for high-volume, simple tasks. Its extensive features can lead to higher expenses than Bland AI if they are not all used.
  • Some users report challenges with customer support, particularly for smaller businesses. This is different from Bland AI, which has a more focused product that may require less support.
  • It requires more development to achieve the same conversational AI capabilities as Bland AI. The platform provides the building blocks, but not a specialized, out-of-the-box AI call agent.

Pricing and Cost Considerations

Twilio operates on a pay-as-you-go model, which can become costly for high-volume use. Since Bland AI's pricing is not publicly listed, a direct cost comparison is difficult. For up-to-date pricing information on similar platforms, we recommend visiting the provider's official website.

2) Plivo

Plivo

Plivo is a communications platform that provides no-code AI agents and CPaaS tools for SMS and voice. Its agents automate conversations for use cases like AI Voice Agents, lead qualification, and customer support.

The service operates on a global network with 99.99% uptime and holds compliance certifications such as SOC 2 and HIPAA. This makes it an option for businesses in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance.

Plivo's Main Features

  • Offers omnichannel delivery over SMS, MMS, WhatsApp, voice, and webchat from a single agent.
  • Provides a no-code workflow builder to customize triggers and logic without developer input.
  • Supports multiple large language models, including those from OpenAI, Google, and Meta.
  • Connects with platforms like Shopify, Stripe, and various CRMs through built-in integrations.

How Plivo Compares To Bland AI

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 741 G2 reviews.

  • Plivo supports communication over SMS, MMS, and WhatsApp. This offers more channels than Bland AI's primary focus on voice calls.
  • The tool holds compliance certifications like SOC 2 and HIPAA. This makes it a suitable choice for regulated industries, a level of compliance not detailed for Bland AI.
  • It provides specific security features like number masking and a verification API. These add data protection layers that are not standard in Bland AI.
  • Users can choose from multiple large language models from providers like Google and Meta. This gives more flexibility than Bland AI's proprietary system.
  • Its platform includes a no-code workflow builder. This lets teams customize conversation logic without developers, offering more control than Bland AI's direct automation.

Where Plivo May Not Be The Best Fit

  • Plivo's platform is broad, so setting up a sophisticated AI call agent can sometimes take more effort than using Bland AI's specialized, ready-to-use solution.
  • For businesses that only need high-volume call automation, its pay-as-you-go model for many features can sometimes be less cost-effective than a focused tool like Bland AI.
  • Some users find the platform's extensive options can introduce complexity, especially when compared to the more straightforward, single-purpose nature of Bland AI.
  • A few users report issues with customer support, which might be a factor for teams without developers, as a focused tool may require less technical assistance.

Pricing and Cost Considerations

While we've covered key features and use cases in this comparison, pricing models can vary significantly between tools. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Plivo's official website.

3) Telnyx

Telnyx

Telnyx is a communications platform with APIs and a global network for voice and messaging. It gives developers tools to build real-time communication features into their applications.

The platform supports use cases like contact center automation and AI voice bots. For sales, it enables custom AI cold call solutions for lead qualification with its Voice API.

Telnyx's Main Features

  • The platform provides a Voice API to build custom AI solutions for lead qualification and automated calls.
  • It operates on a private, global IP network that ensures low-latency voice and messaging delivery.
  • A dedicated Messaging API allows for the integration of SMS and MMS into business applications.
  • Its programmable communication tools support the automation of contact center workflows.

How Telnyx Compares to Bland AI

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 491 G2 reviews.

  • Telnyx uses a private global IP network. This can result in lower call latency compared to Bland AI, which operates over public internet infrastructure.
  • The platform supports more communication types, with APIs for SMS, MMS, and fax. Bland AI, in comparison, concentrates on automated voice calls.
  • It offers 24/7 in-house engineering support. This provides more specialized technical help than the customer support for a focused tool like Bland AI.
  • This tool has built-in enterprise security and fraud detection. This is an extra layer of protection that is not a core feature of Bland AI.
  • Telnyx connects with over 21 other platforms, including Zoho CRM. This offers more integration possibilities than Bland AI's more focused design.

Where Telnyx May Not Be The Best Fit

  • Telnyx is a developer-focused platform, so it requires more technical skill to set up an AI call agent. Bland AI, in comparison, provides a ready-to-use solution for teams without developers.
  • Some users note a learning curve for advanced features. This can result in a longer setup time to build a custom call solution compared to Bland AI, which is designed for quick deployment.
  • The tool provides broad communication APIs but does not have a specialized, pre-built conversational AI agent. This means it requires development effort to match Bland AI's focused automation.
  • A few reviews mention that processes like verification can sometimes be frustrating. For teams that need a simple tool, Bland AI's focused approach may present fewer administrative hurdles.

Pricing and Cost Considerations

Telnyx operates on a pay-as-you-go model, but a direct cost comparison is difficult since Bland AI's pricing is not public. While some users note Telnyx can have higher costs for certain tiers, its flexible pricing is often considered competitive. For the most accurate information, we recommend visiting Telnyx's official website.

4) Vonage Communications APIs

Vonage Communications APIs

Vonage Communications APIs (formerly Nexmo) let developers embed voice, video, and messaging into applications. The platform provides APIs for custom communication workflows and integration with business systems.

For sales, its Voice API can construct AI cold call tools to qualify leads and set appointments. This approach enables tailored communication solutions inside a company's software.

Vonage Communications APIs's Main Features

  • Offers a programmable video API for building customizable live video sessions with global reach.
  • Includes a Verify API to implement two-factor authentication for user validation and fraud prevention.
  • Provides a single conversations API to manage interactions across multiple channels like chat, voice, and email.
  • Features an AI Studio to build conversational experiences across voice, video, and messaging channels.

How Vonage Compares To Bland AI

Average Review score: 4.2/5 stars based on 387 G2 reviews.

  • Vonage Communications APIs provide a programmable video API for live sessions. This is a feature not available in Bland AI, which focuses on voice communication.
  • The platform includes a Verify API to add two-factor authentication. This offers a security layer for user validation that is different from Bland AI's core functionality.
  • It offers a single conversations API to manage interactions across multiple channels. This contrasts with Bland AI's primary focus on automated voice calls.
  • The tool's AI Studio lets users create conversational experiences without extensive code. This provides more creative control compared to Bland AI's more specialized, pre-configured call agent.

Where Vonage May Not Be The Best Fit

  • The platform is developer-focused, so it requires technical skill to create an AI call agent. This differs from Bland AI, which provides a solution that non-technical teams can use immediately.
  • Some users note a learning curve with advanced features. This can result in a longer setup time to build a custom call solution, unlike Bland AI, which is designed for fast deployment.
  • This tool offers broad communication APIs but lacks a specialized, pre-built conversational AI agent. As a result, it requires development work to achieve the focused automation that Bland AI provides out of the box.
  • Its extensive features may be more than what is needed for simple call automation. This can sometimes result in higher costs for basic tasks when compared to a specialized tool like Bland AI.

Pricing and Cost Considerations

While we've covered key features and use cases in this comparison, pricing models can vary significantly between tools. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Vonage Communications APIs's official website.

5) Bandwidth

Bandwidth

Bandwidth is a communications platform with APIs for voice, text, and emergency services. The company operates its own carrier network, which gives developers direct control of their communication stack. For sales, its voice API allows the creation of custom AI call tools to connect with and qualify leads.

Bandwidth's Main Features

  • Offers an emergency calling API and dynamic location routing for E911 services.
  • Integrates with enterprise platforms like Microsoft Teams through Direct Routing and Operator Connect.
  • Manages phone number ordering, porting, and caller ID as a direct carrier.
  • Includes security services like Pindrop voice security and number reputation management.

How Bandwidth Compares To Bland AI

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 453 G2 reviews.

  • Bandwidth operates its own carrier network in over 65 countries. This provides more direct control over call quality compared to Bland AI, which relies on public internet infrastructure.
  • It includes an emergency calling API for E911 services. This is a compliance feature for certain businesses that is not part of Bland AI's core voice automation.
  • As a direct carrier, the platform manages phone number porting and caller ID. This offers more infrastructure control than Bland AI's application-focused service.
  • This tool provides specific security services, including voice security and number reputation management. This adds a layer of protection not found in Bland AI's standard offering.

Where Bandwidth May Not Be The Best Fit

  • Bandwidth is a developer platform, so it requires technical skill to create an AI call agent. This is different from Bland AI, which provides a ready-to-use solution for teams without developers.
  • The platform's setup can be complex for some users. Building a custom solution may take more time compared to Bland AI, which is designed for immediate use.
  • It provides broad communication APIs but lacks a specialized, pre-built conversational AI agent. This means teams need to invest development resources to match the automation Bland AI offers out of the box.

Pricing and Cost Considerations

While we've covered key features and use cases in this comparison, pricing models can vary significantly between tools. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Bandwidth's official website.

Get Started with 11x

After a review of developer-focused platforms, you may find your team needs a more complete solution. 11x provides digital workers that handle the entire sales process, from prospecting to CRM updates. This approach is for teams that want to add specialized support.

Our platform combines data, outreach, and CRM management. If you want to see how AI agents can support your sales goals, book a demo to learn more.

At 11x, we use AI to run your sales playbook. Our agent Alice finds accounts and handles outreach, while Julian qualifies leads and books meetings. We combine data, outreach, and email warmup into one platform, removing the need for extra tools.

Book a demo to see our AI agents in action.

6) Sinch

Sinch

Sinch is a customer communications platform that offers APIs for voice, messaging, and video. For sales, its Voice API allows the creation of AI-powered call tools to qualify leads and schedule appointments.

This approach lets businesses embed custom communication workflows directly into their existing software and applications.

Sinch's Main Features

  • Provides omnichannel messaging APIs for SMS, MMS, RCS, WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook Messenger, email, and fax.
  • Offers a verification suite that uses SMS, data, flash calls, and WhatsApp for one-time passwords and number lookups.
  • Operates on a tier-1 global network with over 600 direct operator connections and integrates with Microsoft Teams and Webex.
  • Includes a drag-and-drop messaging platform and a chatbot builder for creating conversational experiences.

How Sinch Compares To Bland AI

Average Review score: 3.8/5 stars based on 31 G2 reviews.

  • Sinch provides omnichannel messaging APIs for SMS, WhatsApp, and email. This offers more communication channels than Bland AI's primary focus on voice calls.
  • The platform includes a verification suite for one-time passwords and number lookups, adding a security function not found in Bland AI's core service.
  • It operates on a tier-1 global network with direct operator connections. This can result in more reliable delivery compared to services like Bland AI that use public internet.
  • This tool offers a chatbot builder to create conversational experiences. This gives teams a different way to build automation, while Bland AI provides a more specialized call agent.

Where Sinch May Not Be The Best Fit

  • Sinch is a developer-focused platform, so it requires technical skill to set up an AI call agent. This is different from Bland AI, which provides a ready-to-use solution for teams without developers.
  • The platform offers broad communication APIs but lacks a specialized, pre-built conversational AI agent. As a result, it requires development work to achieve the focused automation that Bland AI provides out of the box.
  • Some users report challenges with customer support. This might be a factor for teams without developers, as a focused tool may require less technical assistance.

Pricing and Cost Considerations

A direct cost comparison is difficult because Bland AI's pricing is not public. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information on Sinch, we recommend visiting Sinch's official website.

7) MessageBird

MessageBird

MessageBird is a customer communication platform with APIs for voice, SMS, and other channels. For sales, its voice API supports the creation of custom AI call tools. This approach allows a business to build automated outreach and lead qualification functions directly inside its own software.

MessageBird's Main Features

  • Offers communication APIs for voice, SMS, and other channels.
  • Provides a voice API that supports the creation of custom AI call tools.
  • Allows businesses to build automated outreach and lead qualification functions inside their own software.

How MessageBird Compares To Bland AI

Average Review score: 3.9/5 stars based on 71 G2 reviews.

  • MessageBird supports communication across SMS, Voice, and WhatsApp. This provides more ways to reach customers compared to Bland AI's focus on voice calls.
  • The platform operates on its own telecommunications carrier infrastructure. This can offer more direct control over call and message delivery than Bland AI, which uses public networks.
  • It offers specific tools for WhatsApp inbox management. This gives businesses a dedicated channel for a popular messaging app, a feature not central to Bland AI's service.
  • The tool includes chatbot capabilities. This allows for automated text-based conversations, offering a different type of automation from Bland AI's voice-centric AI agent.

Where MessageBird May Not Be The Best Fit

  • MessageBird requires technical skill to build an AI call agent, unlike Bland AI's ready-to-use solution for non-technical teams.
  • It provides general communication tools but lacks a pre-built conversational AI. This means teams must develop the specific automation that Bland AI offers out of the box.
  • Some users report that its setup is complex and can take time. This contrasts with Bland AI, which is designed for quick deployment without a long implementation period.

Pricing and Cost Considerations

While we've covered key features and use cases in this comparison, pricing models can vary significantly between tools. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting MessageBird's official website.

8) Five9

Five9

Five9 is a cloud contact center platform for customer engagement across voice and digital channels. For sales teams, its AI applications automate outreach and guide agents during calls. The system helps manage customer interactions and improve overall contact center performance.

Five9's Main Features

  • Supports communication across voice, social, and email channels.
  • Includes session routing, session queuing, and concurrent calling functions.
  • Provides administrator access and tools for creating session summary notes.
  • Offers reporting and dashboards to monitor contact center activity.

How Five9 Compares To Bland AI

Average Review score: 4.1/5 stars based on 533 G2 reviews.

  • Five9 supports communication across voice, social, and email. This provides more channels for customer interaction compared to Bland AI's primary focus on voice calls.
  • The platform includes reporting and dashboards to monitor contact center performance. This offers deeper operational insights than the more direct call automation of Bland AI.
  • It provides session routing and queuing to manage live agent workflows. This is a different approach from Bland AI, which automates individual calls without live agent management.
  • This tool offers administrator access and session summary notes to support agent teams. This is a feature for managing a contact center, which is outside the scope of Bland AI's automated calling service.

Where Five9 May Not Be The Best Fit

  • Five9 is a full contact center platform, so its setup can be more complex. This is different from Bland AI, which offers a more direct, ready-to-use solution for automated calls.
  • Its design as a complete contact center solution can be excessive for teams that only need automated calling. Bland AI, in comparison, provides a specialized tool focused only on that task.
  • Some users report that the platform's user interface can feel dated. This might create a learning curve compared to the more focused nature of a single-purpose tool like Bland AI.

Pricing and Cost Considerations

A direct cost comparison is difficult since pricing for both Five9 and Bland AI is not publicly listed. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Five9's official website.

9) Talkdesk

Talkdesk

Talkdesk is a cloud contact center platform that uses AI to manage customer interactions. For sales, its tools automate outbound campaigns and support agents with real-time guidance. This allows teams to build AI-driven cold call workflows to qualify leads within a unified system.

Talkdesk's Main Features

  • Provides communication through voice and email channels.
  • Includes session routing, session queuing, and concurrent calling functions.
  • Offers administrator access and tools for creating session summary notes.
  • Features reporting and dashboards to monitor contact center activity.

How Talkdesk Compares To Bland AI

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 2,431 G2 reviews.

  • Talkdesk supports communication across voice and email channels. This provides more ways to reach customers compared to Bland AI's focus on voice calls.
  • It includes session routing and queuing to manage live agent workflows. This is a different approach from Bland AI, which automates individual calls without live agent management.
  • The platform provides reporting and dashboards to monitor contact center performance. This offers deeper operational insights than the more direct call automation of Bland AI.
  • This tool offers administrator access and session summary notes to support agent teams. This is a feature for managing a contact center, which is outside the scope of Bland AI's automated calling service.

Where Talkdesk May Not Be The Best Fit

  • Talkdesk is a full contact center platform, which can introduce complexity for simple call automation. Bland AI, in comparison, provides a specialized tool designed only for that purpose.
  • Some users find its setup can be more involved due to its broad feature set. This is different from Bland AI, which is built for quick deployment of automated call campaigns.
  • The tool's per-user pricing model is designed for a full contact center. For teams that only need high-volume call automation, this structure might be less cost-effective than a more focused service like Bland AI.

Pricing and Cost Considerations

Talkdesk offers plans starting at $85 per user, per month. Since Bland AI's pricing is not public, a direct comparison is difficult, but Talkdesk's per-user model is designed for full contact center teams. For detailed pricing information, we recommend visiting Talkdesk's official website.

10) Amazon Connect

Amazon Connect

Amazon Connect is a cloud contact center from AWS for omnichannel communication like voice and chat. For sales, its tools can build AI-powered outbound call systems to contact and qualify leads. This approach supports automated outreach campaigns within a scalable infrastructure.

Amazon Connect's Main Features

  • Supports omnichannel communication across voice, social, and web chat.
  • Includes session routing, session queuing, and concurrent calling functions.
  • Provides administrator access and tools for creating session summary notes.
  • Features reporting and dashboards to monitor contact center activity.

How Amazon Connect Compares To Bland AI

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 63 G2 reviews.

  • Amazon Connect supports communication across voice, social, and web chat. This provides more channels than Bland AI's focus on voice calls.
  • It includes session routing and queuing to manage live agent workflows. This is a different approach from Bland AI, which automates individual calls without live agent management.
  • The platform provides reporting and dashboards to monitor contact center activity. This offers deeper operational insights than the direct call automation of Bland AI.
  • This tool offers administrator access and session summary notes to support agent teams. This is a feature for managing a contact center, which is outside the scope of Bland AI's automated calling service.

Where Amazon Connect May Not Be The Best Fit

  • Amazon Connect is a full contact center platform, which can introduce complexity for simple call automation. In comparison, Bland AI provides a specialized tool designed only for that purpose.
  • It provides the building blocks for AI but does not include a specialized, pre-built conversational agent. This means teams must invest development resources to match the automation Bland AI offers.
  • Some users note that its pay-as-you-go model can become costly, especially if premium support is needed. For teams that only need high-volume call automation, this structure might be less cost-effective than a focused service.

Pricing and Cost Considerations

While we've covered key features and use cases in this comparison, pricing models can vary significantly between tools. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Amazon Connect's official website.

Which One Should You Go With?

Choosing a Bland AI alternative depends on many factors, including your technical resources and specific communication needs. This guide provided a detailed comparison of several options to help you make an informed decision.

If your needs go beyond call automation to a full sales process, 11x offers a different approach. Our platform provides AI agents that manage prospecting, outreach, and CRM updates, combining multiple sales functions into one system.

Frequently Asked Questions