Enrich.so Alternatives

Enrich.so is a useful tool for specific tasks. Many users find it performs well for data enrichment, particularly with its reverse email lookup and company data features. Its ease of use and simple setup make it a go-to choice for quickly enriching lead data.

But like any tool, it has some limitations. Some users report that queries can be slow and that data formatting requires extra steps. We've analyzed the top alternatives based on G2 reviews to help you find the right fit for your needs. Let's get started.

Try 11x for Your Sales Team

For teams that want to add digital workers to their sales process, 11x is an option. It offers autonomous agents for tasks like lead research and outreach. These agents work with your sales staff to improve output.

11x is a GTM platform that uses AI agents to manage the sales process. We combine functions like data enrichment, outreach, and email warmup, so you do not need separate tools for each task.

Our AI agent, Alice, finds prospects, runs outreach on email and LinkedIn, and keeps your CRM current. A second agent, Julian, qualifies inbound leads and books meetings.

Enrich.so Alternatives

Here is a detailed review of the main alternatives to Enrich.so. Each review breaks down pricing, core features, and the specific pros and cons when measured against Enrich.so.

1) Clearbit

Clearbit, now part of HubSpot, provides B2B data for go-to-market teams. The service gathers public and proprietary data, then uses LLMs to create standardized datasets. It enriches CRM records with company and contact details for lead qualification and routing.

The platform also identifies anonymous website visitors that match an ideal customer profile. It can shorten web forms to boost conversion rates while it captures complete data.

Clearbit's Main Features

• Aggregates public and proprietary data, using LLM processing to create standardized datasets.
• Scores and routes leads in real-time using deep industry classifications like 6-digit NAICS codes and corporate hierarchy mapping.
• De-anonymizes website traffic to identify visiting companies that match the ideal customer profile.
• Shortens web forms by automatically enriching fields to reduce friction and increase conversion rates.

Clearbit vs. Enrich.so: Key Differences

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 626 G2 reviews.

• Clearbit can identify anonymous companies that visit your website. This provides top-of-funnel prospects, unlike Enrich.so, which primarily enriches existing lead lists.
• It shortens web forms by auto-filling company data. This can increase conversion rates, a capability not offered by Enrich.so.
• The tool provides over 100 data points for each record. This is more comprehensive than the data typically available through Enrich.so, which sometimes requires extra formatting.
• Its deep integration with platforms like HubSpot allows for automated workflows, a more advanced feature compared to the basic data connections of Enrich.so.

Clearbit's Limitations Compared to Enrich.so

• Clearbit often requires a longer setup time, sometimes up to a month, and has a higher price point. In comparison, Enrich.so offers a more straightforward and quicker initial setup for users.
• Some users find that Clearbit's contact information is occasionally out of date. This might require manual verification, which contrasts with Enrich.so's specific focus on reverse email lookups for fresh data.
• The tool's extensive features can be complex for teams that only need a simple solution. Enrich.so provides a more focused tool for specific tasks like data enrichment without the added complexity of a full suite.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Enrich.so offers transparent, credit-based pricing with one-time purchases, such as its $70 plan for 500 credits. In contrast, Clearbit does not list public pricing, which suggests a custom, quote-based model geared toward enterprise customers that typically requires a higher investment.

2) ZoomInfo SalesOS

ZoomInfo SalesOS is a go-to-market intelligence platform for B2B companies. It combines contact and company data with buyer-intent signals and engagement tools in one system. The platform helps revenue teams identify and connect with buyers through a single source of information.

For data enrichment, it appends and refreshes CRM data in real time. The service also automates data hygiene and enrichment workflows and provides data access through an API.

ZoomInfo SalesOS's Main Features

• Identifies prospects ready to buy using real-time intent signals.
• Turns anonymous website page views into potential sales pipeline.
• Automates phone and email outreach to streamline engagement with prospects.
• Analyzes call and meeting interactions to gather insights with its conversation intelligence tool.

ZoomInfo SalesOS vs. Enrich.so: Key Differences

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 8,738 G2 reviews.

• ZoomInfo SalesOS provides buyer intent data to find prospects who are actively searching for a solution, a feature that goes beyond Enrich.so's focus on existing lead lists.
• It includes built-in sales engagement tools for email and phone outreach, unlike Enrich.so, which requires separate applications for contacting prospects.
• The platform can identify anonymous companies visiting your website to generate new leads, whereas Enrich.so primarily works with data for known contacts.
• Its conversation intelligence tool analyzes sales calls for performance insights, offering a coaching element not present in Enrich.so's data-centric toolkit.

ZoomInfo SalesOS Limitations Compared to Enrich.so

• Some users report that the platform's setup can take up to a month, and its pricing is custom. This differs from Enrich.so, which offers a quick setup and transparent, credit-based pricing for immediate use.
• The tool is a comprehensive platform with many features beyond simple data enrichment. For teams that only need reverse email lookups, Enrich.so provides a more focused and less complex tool.
• Its contact data might sometimes be out of date, according to user reviews. In contrast, Enrich.so's core function is reverse email lookup, a method that focuses on retrieving current information for a specific contact.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Enrich.so offers a transparent, credit-based model with one-time purchases, such as $70 for 500 credits, providing flexibility for various needs. In contrast, ZoomInfo SalesOS operates on a custom, quote-based model without public pricing. For accurate cost information, we recommend visiting ZoomInfo SalesOS's official website.

3) Apollo.io

Apollo.io is a sales intelligence platform that offers a database of company and contact information. For data enrichment, it helps sales teams add details to their existing records. The platform integrates prospecting and engagement tools, which allows teams to manage outreach and lead generation activities within a single interface.

Apollo.io's Main Features

• Offers a database of company and contact information.
• Integrates prospecting and engagement tools.
• Allows teams to manage outreach and lead generation activities within a single interface.

Apollo.io vs. Enrich.so: Key Differences

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 8,904 G2 reviews.

• Apollo.io provides a database of over 210 million contacts to find new leads, while Enrich.so primarily adds data to existing contact lists.
• The platform combines prospecting, engagement, and analytics tools in a single interface. This differs from Enrich.so, which focuses on data enrichment and requires separate tools for outreach.
• Its built-in engagement suite automates outreach sequences. In contrast, Enrich.so users must use other applications to contact their enriched leads.
• This tool offers a free plan for users to get started. This provides a different entry point compared to Enrich.so's credit-based model that requires an upfront purchase.

Apollo.io's Limitations Compared to Enrich.so

• Some users report that data in Apollo.io's large database can sometimes be inaccurate. This is different from Enrich.so, which focuses on reverse email lookups to get current information for a specific contact.
• The tool is a comprehensive platform with many features, which may be complex for teams that only need a simple enrichment solution. Enrich.so offers a more focused tool for specific tasks.
• Its wide range of features can require more training time for a team. In comparison, Enrich.so has a simpler setup that allows users to start on data tasks quickly.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Enrich.so's pricing is credit-based with one-time purchases, such as $70 for 500 credits, suiting project-based needs. In contrast, Apollo.io uses a subscription model with a free tier and paid plans starting from $49 per month, which is better for continuous use. For detailed costs, see Apollo.io's official website.

4) Lusha

Lusha is a platform that provides B2B contact information, like direct phone numbers and emails. For data enrichment, it automates CRM updates with accurate data on leads and contacts. The tool also fills in missing data points to keep information current.

Lusha's Main Features

• Generates daily, ICP-based lists of companies and decision-makers using an AI recommendation engine.
• Identifies in-market buyers with intent signals and sends real-time alerts on triggers.
• Automates and personalizes email sequences using AI-driven copy to engage with prospects.
• Records and analyzes sales meetings to gather performance insights.

Lusha vs. Enrich.so: Key Differences

Average Review score: 4.3/5 stars based on 1,516 G2 reviews.

• Lusha uses an AI recommendation engine to generate daily lists of new prospects. This is different from Enrich.so, which focuses on adding data to your existing lead lists.
• It provides buyer intent signals to identify prospects who are actively looking for a solution. Enrich.so, in comparison, does not offer this feature and works with the contacts you already have.
• The tool includes AI-driven features to automate and personalize email outreach sequences. With Enrich.so, you need a separate application to contact your enriched leads.
• Lusha offers a tool to record and analyze sales meetings for performance insights. This provides a coaching element not found in Enrich.so's data-focused toolkit.
• The platform offers a free plan to let users test the service. This contrasts with Enrich.so's model, which requires a one-time purchase of credits to start.

Lusha's Limitations Compared to Enrich.so

• Some users report that Lusha's contact information can be out of date. This differs from Enrich.so, which uses reverse email lookup to get current data for a specific contact.
• The tool is a comprehensive platform with many features. For teams that only need a simple enrichment solution, Enrich.so provides a more focused tool without the added complexity.
• Its subscription model is designed for continuous use. This can be less flexible for one-time projects compared to Enrich.so's pay-as-you-go credit system.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Lusha offers a subscription model with plans like its Pro tier at $36 per user per month, while Enrich.so uses a credit-based system with one-time purchases, such as $70 for 500 credits. Lusha's model is suited for continuous use, whereas Enrich.so's pay-as-you-go structure is more flexible for project-based needs. For the most current details, we recommend visiting Lusha's official website.

5) Cognism

Cognism is a sales intelligence platform that provides B2B contact and company data. Teams use it to find and connect with customers. For data enrichment, the platform cleans and enhances CRM records with verified information to maintain data accuracy.

The tool also offers global data coverage for international sales and marketing operations.

Cognism's Main Features

• Offers phone-verified, human-checked mobile numbers, called Diamond Data®, to increase connection rates.
• Provides extensive data coverage of mobile numbers and email addresses for contacts in the UK and EMEA.
• Identifies buying signals from hiring trends, funding rounds, and technographic changes for timely outreach.
• Supplies data on VP-level and higher decision-makers that is screened against Do-Not-Call lists for compliant outreach.

Cognism vs. Enrich.so: Key Differences

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 1,033 G2 reviews.

• Cognism provides phone-verified mobile numbers, known as Diamond Data®, for higher connection rates. This is different from Enrich.so, which focuses on reverse email lookups for data enrichment.
• It offers strong data coverage for contacts in the UK and EMEA, providing an advantage for international outreach compared to Enrich.so's more general capabilities.
• The tool identifies buying signals from company changes like funding rounds. This helps find timely opportunities, whereas Enrich.so works with the lead lists you already have.
• This platform supplies contact data for decision-makers that is checked against Do-Not-Call lists. This feature supports compliant outreach, a detail not specified for Enrich.so's enrichment process.

Cognism's Limitations Compared To Enrich.so

• Cognism's custom pricing model is designed for larger teams with ongoing needs. This is different from Enrich.so's credit-based system, which offers more flexibility for single projects or smaller budgets.
• The platform's wide range of features can mean a longer setup time, sometimes up to a month. In comparison, Enrich.so provides a simpler tool that teams can use for data enrichment tasks almost immediately.
• Some users find that contact data in Cognism's large database is occasionally out of date. Enrich.so focuses on reverse email lookups, a method designed to pull current information for a specific, known contact.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Enrich.so provides a transparent, credit-based system with one-time purchases, such as $70 for 500 credits, which is suitable for project-based needs. Cognism, in contrast, operates on a custom, quote-based model aimed at larger teams. For accurate pricing, we recommend visiting Cognism's official website.

Add Digital Workers to Your Sales Team with 11x

For teams that want to use digital workers for sales, 11x provides autonomous agents. These agents perform lead research and outreach. They work with your current staff to support the sales process and help manage different parts of your sales workflow.

With 11x, we use AI to run your sales playbook. Our agent Alice finds accounts, enriches data, and handles outreach, while Julian qualifies inbound leads and books meetings. We combine functions like intent data and email warmup, replacing multiple tools in your GTM stack.

Book a demo to see how it works.

6) Hunter

Hunter is a tool to find and verify professional email addresses. It allows users to search for contacts associated with a specific company domain. The platform also includes an email verifier to check the deliverability of an address.

Teams use it to build lead lists and enrich their contact data with valid email information. This helps ensure communication reaches the intended recipient.

Hunter's Main Features

• Finds all publicly available email addresses from a specific domain name or company URL.
• Includes an email verifier that validates lists to reduce bounce rates and protect sender reputation.
• Offers a cold-email suite to compose messages, schedule automated follow-ups, and view performance analytics.
• Provides a TechLookup feature that lists websites based on the technology stack they use.

Hunter vs. Enrich.so: Key Differences

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 592 G2 reviews.

• Hunter includes a cold-email suite to send messages and schedule follow-ups. This is different from Enrich.so, which requires a separate tool for outreach.
• The tool provides a TechLookup feature that finds websites based on their technology stack. Enrich.so does not offer a similar function for technology-based prospecting.
• It offers a free plan to test its features. This contrasts with Enrich.so's model, which requires an upfront purchase of credits to begin.
• Hunter's email verifier checks lists to reduce bounce rates. This is a more direct validation process compared to Enrich.so's primary function of reverse email lookup to enrich data.

Hunter's Limitations Compared to Enrich.so

• Hunter's focus is the discovery and verification of email addresses. In contrast, Enrich.so uses reverse email lookup to provide detailed company data for existing contacts, a function Hunter does not specialize in.
• The tool provides less comprehensive company information for each contact. Enrich.so, by comparison, appends multiple data points to a record, which creates a richer profile for sales teams.
• Some users report its data can be limited for certain contacts. This differs from Enrich.so, which has a specialized function to enrich specific, known leads with current data via reverse lookup.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Hunter uses a subscription model with plans starting at $49 per month, which is suited for ongoing use. In contrast, Enrich.so offers a credit-based system with one-time purchases, like 500 credits for $70, providing more flexibility for project-based tasks without a recurring fee.

7) RocketReach

RocketReach is a database of professional and company profiles that users access to find contact information. It serves sales, recruiting, and marketing teams that need to connect with specific individuals.

For data enrichment, the platform appends details like emails and phone numbers to existing records. It also supports the creation of new prospect lists from its data.

RocketReach's Main Features

• Accesses a database of professional and company profiles to find contact information.
• Appends details like emails and phone numbers to existing contact records.
• Supports the creation of new prospect lists directly from its internal database.

RocketReach vs. Enrich.so: Key Differences

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 918 G2 reviews.

• RocketReach provides a database of over 700 million professionals to build new prospect lists, unlike Enrich.so, which enriches existing contacts.
• The tool offers prebuilt integrations with platforms like Salesforce, providing more advanced workflow options than Enrich.so's basic connections.
• It includes a free plan to test the service, whereas Enrich.so requires an upfront credit purchase to start.
• The platform offers specialized data for industries like healthcare, which is more targeted than the general company data available through Enrich.so.

RocketReach's Limitations Compared To Enrich.so

• Some users find that contact details in RocketReach's large database are sometimes out of date. In comparison, Enrich.so focuses on reverse email lookup to pull current company information for a specific contact.
• RocketReach's primary function is to build new prospect lists from its database. For teams that only need to add company data to their existing contacts, Enrich.so offers a more direct and specialized tool.
• The platform's subscription plans are better for continuous prospecting needs. This is less flexible than Enrich.so's credit-based system, which allows users to pay for a specific number of enrichments for a single project.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

RocketReach uses a monthly subscription model, with its Ultimate plan offering 500 lookups for $300 per month. In contrast, Enrich.so provides a credit-based system where 500 credits cost $70 as a one-time purchase. RocketReach's model suits ongoing needs, while Enrich.so is more cost-effective for project-based tasks.

8) People Data Labs

People Data Labs provides B2B data for developers and data teams through a suite of APIs. The service is used to enrich records with person and company information. Common applications include lead qualification, identity resolution, and data append tasks.

People Data Labs's Main Features

• Offers a suite of APIs for developers to build custom data products and solutions.
• Provides data to power predictive modeling and artificial intelligence applications.
• Manages large-scale data collection to provide datasets for building person and company profiles.
• Includes a free API key for developers to start building and enriching profiles without a credit card.

People Data Labs vs. Enrich.so: Key Differences

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 16 G2 reviews.

• People Data Labs provides a suite of APIs that developers use to build custom data solutions. This is different from Enrich.so, which is a ready-to-use tool for sales teams.
• It provides data that powers predictive modeling and AI applications. This allows for more advanced use cases compared to the direct data enrichment offered by Enrich.so.
• The tool includes a free API key, which lets developers test and build with the data. In contrast, Enrich.so requires an upfront credit purchase to use its service.
• This service is designed for large-scale data operations and the creation of new products, which contrasts with Enrich.so's focus on enriching individual lead lists.

People Data Labs's Limitations Compared To Enrich.so

• People Data Labs is an API suite for developers, which requires technical skills to use. In comparison, Enrich.so is a ready-made tool for sales teams that is easy to set up.
• The tool does not offer a graphical user interface for queries, as some users note. This is different from Enrich.so, which provides a simple interface for sales teams to enrich data directly.
• Its custom pricing model is designed for large-scale data operations. This contrasts with Enrich.so's credit-based system, which offers more flexibility for smaller, project-based enrichment needs.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Enrich.so offers a transparent, credit-based system with one-time purchases, such as $70 for 500 credits. People Data Labs uses a custom pricing model for its API suite. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting the People Data Labs's official website.

9) LeadIQ

LeadIQ is a prospecting platform that helps sales teams find contact information. For data enrichment, it allows users to capture and add verified email addresses and phone numbers to their prospect lists, often directly from social media profiles.

LeadIQ's Main Features

• Finds and captures contact data from websites like LinkedIn using a browser extension.
• Verifies email addresses in real-time to help with deliverability.
• Syncs prospect information directly to CRM platforms like Salesforce.

LeadIQ vs. Enrich.so: Key Differences

Average Review score: 4.2/5 stars based on 638 G2 reviews.

• LeadIQ is designed for live prospecting with a browser extension to find contact data. This differs from Enrich.so, which focuses on batch-enriching existing lead lists.
• The tool verifies email addresses as part of its capture process. This is a different approach than Enrich.so's reverse lookup for company data.
• It offers a free plan for users to test the service. In contrast, Enrich.so requires an upfront credit purchase to get started.

LeadIQ's Limitations Compared to Enrich.so

• LeadIQ's company data may not be as detailed as the information provided by Enrich.so's reverse email lookup, which is specialized for that task.
• Some users report that the contact information can occasionally be inaccurate. This is a common issue for large databases, while Enrich.so focuses on a specific known contact.
• The platform is primarily a prospecting tool. For teams that only need to enrich existing lists, Enrich.so offers a more direct solution.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

LeadIQ uses a subscription model with plans starting from $39 per month, which is suited for ongoing prospecting. Enrich.so's credit-based system, like $70 for 500 credits, offers more flexibility for one-off data enrichment projects without a recurring commitment.

LeadIQ is a platform for sales teams to find contact information. For data enrichment, it captures and adds verified email addresses and phone numbers to prospect lists. The tool often gets this data directly from social media profiles.

LeadIQ's Main Features

• Finds prospect data and tracks sales triggers in one platform.
• Personalizes cold outreach to prospects at scale.
• Captures leads and contact information from websites and social profiles.
• Integrates with CRM and marketing automation systems to sync data.

LeadIQ vs. Enrich.so: Key Differences

Average Review score: 4.2/5 stars based on 1,097 G2 reviews.

• LeadIQ finds new contacts with a browser extension on sites like LinkedIn. This is different from Enrich.so, which adds data to your existing lists.
• The platform offers a free plan to test its features. Enrich.so, in comparison, requires a credit purchase before you can use it.
• It tracks sales triggers like job changes to help you time your outreach. This is a prospecting feature that Enrich.so does not have.
• This tool verifies email addresses in real time to improve deliverability. This is a more direct validation process than Enrich.so's reverse lookup function.

LeadIQ's Limitations Compared To Enrich.so

• LeadIQ's company data may not be as detailed. It focuses on finding contact information, while Enrich.so's reverse email lookup provides a more complete company profile for a known lead.
• The tool is primarily for live prospecting to find new contacts. For teams that only need to enrich existing lists with company data, Enrich.so offers a more direct solution.
• Some users report that the contact information can sometimes be inaccurate. This can be an issue with large databases, while Enrich.so focuses on a specific, known contact to pull current data.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

LeadIQ uses a subscription model with plans starting at $45 per month, which is suited for ongoing prospecting. In contrast, Enrich.so offers a credit-based system, like $70 for 500 credits, providing more flexibility for one-off data enrichment projects without a recurring commitment.

10) Snov.io

Snov.io is a sales automation platform that combines lead generation with outreach tools. It finds and verifies email addresses from company domains or lists of names. For data enrichment, it appends contact and company details to records.

This function helps build prospect profiles for targeted outreach. The platform also includes tools to manage email campaigns and track their results.

Snov.io's Main Features

• Manages sales force automation, including contact, account, opportunity, and pipeline management.
• Automates marketing functions and provides lead management capabilities.
• Offers reporting and analytics with visual dashboards.
• Provides access to contact, company, and industry research data.

Snov.io vs. Enrich.so: Key Differences

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 450 G2 reviews.

• Snov.io includes a sales automation platform to manage email campaigns and outreach, a function that requires a separate tool when using Enrich.so.
• It offers CRM features like contact and pipeline management, while Enrich.so focuses only on enriching existing lead lists with company data.
• The tool provides a free trial to test its features, which is different from Enrich.so's model that requires an upfront credit purchase.
• This platform has reporting and analytics dashboards to track performance, a feature not available in Enrich.so as its function is limited to data enrichment.

Snov.io's Limitations Compared To Enrich.so

• Snov.io's data enrichment is a feature within a larger sales automation suite. In contrast, Enrich.so is a specialized tool built for reverse email lookup, which can offer more depth for that single task.
• The tool is designed to find email addresses from a company domain. It is less focused on the reverse process, where Enrich.so takes an email and returns a comprehensive company profile.
• For users who only need to enrich an existing list, the process in Snov.io might be less direct. Enrich.so provides a simple interface focused solely on this task, which can be faster for project-based needs.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Snov.io offers a subscription model with plans starting at $39 per month, which is suited for ongoing use. In contrast, Enrich.so uses a credit-based system with one-time purchases, such as 500 credits for $70. Snov.io's model fits teams with continuous outreach needs, while Enrich.so is more cost-effective for single projects.

Which One Should You Go With?

Choosing the right Enrich.so alternative depends on your team's specific needs and budget. This guide reviewed several options to help you make an informed decision.

If your team wants to add digital workers to the sales process, 11x offers autonomous agents for tasks like lead research and outreach. These agents work with your sales staff to improve output and manage different parts of your sales workflow.