Bricks.ai Alternatives

Bricks.ai is a tool many sales teams use. It's quite good for quickly creating personalized documents like presentations and proposals. It pulls together company assets from different teams, which helps maintain brand consistency and saves time for sales reps.

However, it has limits. Some users say customer support could be better, and few reviews exist. So, we analyzed top alternatives on G2, comparing their pros and cons to Bricks.ai to help you find the right fit. Let's get started.

Consider 11x for Sales Automation

If your sales team is exploring digital workers, consider 11x. It provides autonomous agents that can handle various sales tasks.

These agents can manage lead research and personalized outreach. This may allow your team to focus more on closing deals.

11x is a GTM platform that uses AI agents to manage the sales process. An agent named Alice finds prospects, handles outreach via email and LinkedIn, and updates the CRM. Julian qualifies inbound leads and schedules meetings.

We see it as a replacement for separate data enrichment, outreach, and email warmup tools. 11x consolidates these functions, potentially replacing multiple tools in a standard GTM stack.

Bricks.ai Alternatives

Below, we review the top Bricks.ai alternatives. Each analysis covers pricing, main features, and the specific advantages and drawbacks versus Bricks.ai to inform your decision.

1) PandaDoc

PandaDoc is a platform for agreement management. It handles the document workflow from creation to e-signature and payment. Teams can create interactive sales proposals, quotes, and contracts. The tool supports brand consistency and legal compliance across documents.

It offers a complete workflow for business documents. This helps teams finalize deals with more speed and accuracy. The solution is cloud-based and covers many business document use cases.

PandaDoc's Main Features

• The platform includes a Configure-Price-Quote (CPQ) tool that pulls product-catalog data to generate automated quotes.

• It supports legally binding eSignatures with features like signing order and identity verification, and offers notarization services.

• Digital deal rooms create collaborative spaces for real-time commenting, redlining, and approvals among stakeholders.

• Users can embed payment gateways such as Stripe, Square, and PayPal directly into documents for immediate payment collection.

PandaDoc vs. Bricks.ai: A Comparison

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 2,893 G2 reviews.

• PandaDoc offers a complete eSignature solution with features like signing order and identity verification. This differs from Bricks.ai, which centers on the initial document creation stage.

• The tool lets you embed payment gateways directly into documents for immediate payment collection, a function that extends beyond Bricks.ai's content assembly capabilities.

• It includes an automated Configure-Price-Quote (CPQ) tool that generates quotes from a product catalog. This provides a more specialized function than the general document personalization in Bricks.ai.

• The platform manages the entire agreement workflow, including contract creation, redlining, and approvals. This is a more comprehensive process compared to Bricks.ai's focus on generating documents from existing assets.

PandaDoc's Limitations Compared to Bricks.ai

• PandaDoc offers limited central asset management. It lacks a central library for company assets like Bricks.ai, which may make it harder for some teams to ensure brand consistency across all their sales documents.

• The tool's focus is on the entire agreement workflow, not just document creation. This is different from Bricks.ai, which specializes in the rapid assembly of personalized sales documents from existing content blocks.

• It provides fewer features for creating documents from a wide range of internal sources. Bricks.ai is designed to connect with different company departments to pull assets, which can be a more direct way to build proposals.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

PandaDoc offers an Essentials plan at $19 per seat per month and a Business plan at $49 per seat per month. Bricks.ai does not make its pricing public, so you will need to contact the company for a quote.

2) Qwilr

Qwilr is a sales-proposal platform that converts static documents into interactive web pages. Sales teams create, send, and track proposals, quotes, and agreements from their CRM. The workflow supports e-signatures and payment collection.

Use cases include proposal generation, document automation, and contract management. The product aims to shorten deal cycles and improve the buyer experience.

Qwilr's Main Features

• The platform creates interactive quotes with selectors for line items, quantity, and pricing that buyers can adjust.

• It includes QwilrPay, which allows teams to accept credit card payments directly within the proposal document.

• The tool provides analytics on document engagement, showing who viewed the proposal, what sections they looked at, and sends real-time alerts.

• It offers document security features such as password protection, unique viewing links, and version control through a live link.

Qwilr vs. Bricks.ai: A Comparison

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 802 G2 reviews.

• Qwilr converts sales materials into interactive web pages. This approach differs from Bricks.ai, which focuses on assembling content for standard documents.

• The tool offers interactive quotes that let buyers select options and see price changes. This is a more specialized function compared to the general document personalization in Bricks.ai.

• Its platform allows for direct payment collection within a proposal. This extends the sales process beyond the document creation stage, which is the primary focus of Bricks.ai.

• The platform provides detailed analytics on how buyers engage with the content. This offers insights into reader behavior, a feature not highlighted in Bricks.ai's document assembly workflow.

Qwilr's Limitations Compared to Bricks.ai

• Qwilr places less emphasis on a central, cross-departmental asset library. Some teams may find it more difficult to maintain brand consistency compared to Bricks.ai, which connects different company departments to pull approved assets.

• The tool primarily converts documents into interactive web pages. This focus might be a limitation for sales teams that require the creation of traditional, static documents like PDFs for offline sharing or specific client needs.

• It offers less flexibility for building documents from individual content blocks. Bricks.ai allows users to assemble proposals from various pre-approved pieces, while Qwilr's workflow centers more on customizing existing templates.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Qwilr’s Business plan is $35 per user per month, while its Enterprise plan is $590 for 10 users. Bricks.ai uses a custom quote model, which may suit complex enterprise needs but makes budgeting less predictable. For full details, visit Qwilr's official website.

3) Conga Composer

Conga Composer is a document automation application. It creates documents like proposals, quotes, and contracts. The tool pulls data from your CRM or ERP systems to produce on-brand documents for sales, legal, and finance teams.

Use cases include the creation of renewal order forms and supplier contracts. The application can also generate paperwork for HR and push documents to Conga Sign for eSignature.

Conga Composer's Main Features

• Merges data from any CRM, ERP, or cloud system using native connectors and open APIs.

• Uses conditional logic and inclusion rules to personalize document content automatically.

• Outputs documents to multiple formats, including PDF and DOCX, and can route them to Conga Sign for eSignature.

• Provides AI-assisted accuracy checks and predictive insights through a platform-wide intelligence layer.

Conga Composer vs. Bricks.ai: A Comparison

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 844 G2 reviews.

• Conga Composer pulls data directly from CRM and ERP systems to populate documents. This differs from Bricks.ai, which primarily assembles documents from a library of pre-approved content assets.

• It uses conditional logic to automatically generate complex documents such as contracts and invoices. This provides a more rules-based approach compared to the content block assembly in Bricks.ai.

• This application outputs documents in multiple formats, like PDF and DOCX, and can route them for eSignature. This extends the workflow beyond the initial document creation stage that Bricks.ai focuses on.

• The platform supports bulk document generation based on triggers, a feature suited for large-scale needs. This capability is distinct from Bricks.ai's focus on creating individual personalized documents.

Conga Composer's Limitations Compared to Bricks.ai

• Conga Composer focuses on merging data from systems like Salesforce. It does not offer a central library for managing company-wide content assets, a core feature of Bricks.ai for maintaining brand consistency.

• Some users report that the tool has a steep learning curve and a complex setup. This approach is different from Bricks.ai, which is designed for sales teams to quickly assemble documents with minimal technical knowledge.

• The platform builds documents by merging data into predefined templates. This method can be less flexible than Bricks.ai's approach, where users build proposals by combining various pre-approved content blocks.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Conga Composer's pricing is not publicly available and, like Bricks.ai, requires a custom quote. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Conga Composer's official website.

4) Formstack Documents

Formstack Documents automates document creation. Teams use it to produce presentations, proposals, and contracts from data sources. The platform populates templates with information from your systems, which removes the need for manual data entry.

The tool supports multiple output formats to fit business needs. Its main purpose is to ensure document consistency and accuracy for sales and other departments.

Formstack Documents's Main Features

• Pulls information from systems like Salesforce, HubSpot, and SharePoint through a Documents API.

• Displays or hides document sections based on data rules to create tailored outputs.

• Combines multiple files or generates several documents from a single data source.

• Sends finished documents to CRMs, eSignature tools like Formstack Sign, and cloud storage repositories.

Formstack Documents vs. Bricks.ai: A Comparison

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 155 G2 reviews.

• Formstack Documents populates templates by pulling data directly from systems like Salesforce. This differs from Bricks.ai, which primarily builds documents from a library of pre-approved content assets.

• It uses conditional logic to automatically show or hide document sections based on data rules. This offers a more automated approach to personalization than Bricks.ai's manual assembly of content blocks.

• The tool can generate documents in batches from a single data source. This capability is suited for large-scale needs, whereas Bricks.ai focuses on creating individual personalized documents.

• This platform automatically delivers finished documents to various destinations, including eSignature tools and cloud storage. This extends the workflow beyond the document creation stage, which is the main focus of Bricks.ai.

Formstack Documents's Limitations vs. Bricks.ai

• Formstack Documents populates templates with data from other systems. It does not offer a central library for content blocks like Bricks.ai, which can make brand consistency a challenge for some teams.

• Its document creation process is template-based. This can be less flexible than Bricks.ai's method, where users build proposals by combining various content pieces from a shared library for a custom document.

• The platform is built for automated document generation from data sources. Some sales teams might find this less intuitive for creating narrative-driven proposals compared to Bricks.ai's block-by-block assembly approach.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Formstack Documents offers plans starting at $110 per month, while Bricks.ai requires a custom quote. This makes Formstack's pricing more predictable, though you should visit Formstack Documents's official website for the most current details.

5) Better Proposals

Better Proposals is a platform to create and send web-based sales documents. Teams use it to build proposals, presentations, and contracts. The tool supports digital signatures and payment collection directly inside the document.

The system also tracks client interaction with the material, such as document views and the time spent on each section.

Better Proposals's Main Features

• The platform includes a drag-and-drop editor with reusable templates, brand controls, and real-time collaboration.

• It provides native, legally-binding digital signatures directly within the document, removing the need for separate tools.

• Users can access a library of over 260 templates and import existing Word documents.

• The tool offers built-in live chat within proposals and provides section-by-section reading analytics.

Better Proposals vs. Bricks.ai: A Comparison

Average Review score: 4.3/5 stars based on 48 G2 reviews.

• Better Proposals creates interactive web-based documents. This approach differs from Bricks.ai, which assembles content blocks into more traditional document formats.

• It provides detailed analytics on how clients view each proposal section. This offers more specific engagement insights than the general document creation focus of Bricks.ai.

• The tool offers a library of over 260 pre-designed templates. This is different from Bricks.ai's method of building documents from a central library of company content assets.

• Its platform includes a built-in live chat feature within proposals for real-time client communication, a function not found in Bricks.ai's document assembly workflow.

Better Proposals's Limitations Compared to Bricks.ai

• Better Proposals focuses on its own template library. This differs from Bricks.ai's central asset management, which pulls content from various company departments to ensure brand consistency across all documents.

• The tool's workflow centers on customizing its templates. This can be less flexible than Bricks.ai's approach, where users assemble proposals by combining various pre-approved content blocks for a more custom build.

• It primarily creates web-based proposals. Some clients may require traditional document formats like PDF, which can be a challenge compared to Bricks.ai's focus on generating standard business documents.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Better Proposals has transparent pricing tiers at $19, $49, and $129 per month for predictable costs, while Bricks.ai requires a custom quote. For the most current details, visit Better Proposals's official website.

A Different Approach: Sales Automation with 11x

The tools reviewed focus on document creation. For a broader solution that automates the sales process from research to outreach, consider 11x. Their digital workers handle these tasks, which allows your reps to focus on deal closure.

With 11x, AI agents run the sales process. Alice finds accounts, enriches data, and manages outreach, while Julian qualifies inbound leads and schedules meetings. The platform combines data, outreach, and warmup functions, which can replace several tools in a standard GTM stack.

Book a demo to see 11x in action.

6) Proposify

Proposify is a platform for sales document workflow. Teams use it to build consistent proposals, contracts, and presentations. The tool gives sales leaders control over content and design. It also tracks prospect engagement with the documents, which provides insight into the review process.

Proposify's Main Features

• Offers interactive quoting that lets prospects adjust quantities and add-ons within the document.

• Provides real-time engagement analytics with open notifications and page-by-page time tracking.

• Includes automated workflows for approval rules, deal-size triggers, and auto-reminders.

• Features a drag-and-drop editor that supports rich media, including embedded video and images.

Proposify vs. Bricks.ai: A Comparison

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 1,122 G2 reviews.

• Proposify provides interactive quoting that lets prospects adjust items in the document. This differs from Bricks.ai, which focuses on creating static documents from content blocks.

• The tool gives real-time engagement analytics, including open alerts and page-view times. This provides more detailed prospect insights compared to the general document generation in Bricks.ai.

• Its platform has automated approval workflows based on triggers like deal size. This offers a more structured process than Bricks.ai's focus on assembling documents from a content library.

• Users can embed rich media, such as videos, directly into proposals with Proposify. This creates a more engaging document compared to the content block assembly approach of Bricks.ai.

Proposify's Limitations Compared to Bricks.ai

• Proposify's content management is more self-contained than Bricks.ai's central asset library. It does not connect to various company departments to pull approved assets, which can sometimes make it harder to ensure brand consistency.

• The platform's workflow centers on its template editor. This approach can be less flexible than Bricks.ai's method, where users assemble proposals by combining various pre-approved content blocks for a more custom document.

• Some users find the editing tools can be difficult for complex customizations. This is different from Bricks.ai's focus on simple assembly, where reps combine ready-made content instead of performing detailed edits within a template.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Proposify offers transparent pricing with plans at $19, $41, and $65 per user per month, which allows for predictable budgeting. Bricks.ai, in contrast, uses a custom quote model that may be better suited for enterprises with complex requirements but offers less cost transparency upfront.

7) Loopio

Loopio is a response management platform. It centralizes information to help teams answer requests for proposals (RFPs) and security questionnaires. The system uses a content library to automate document completion.

This function supports sales teams in the creation of consistent, accurate materials like presentations. Teams can build documents with content from a single, approved source.

Loopio's Main Features

• Generates first-draft answers and refines content with an AI tuned for the response process.

• Includes built-in tools to evaluate opportunities and focus on high-value RFPs.

• Aligns to an organization's existing processes with configurable workflows for task assignment and review cycles.

• Provides strategic analytics and benchmarks from hundreds of thousands of past RFP projects.

Loopio vs. Bricks.ai: A Comparison

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 731 G2 reviews.

• Loopio is built for response management, such as RFPs and security questionnaires. This is a more specialized function compared to Bricks.ai's general document assembly for sales proposals.

• The platform uses an AI tool to automatically complete first drafts of questionnaires. This provides a different level of automation than Bricks.ai's manual block assembly.

• It offers strategic analytics from past RFP projects to help teams benchmark performance. This is different from Bricks.ai, which focuses on the creation stage rather than post-project analysis.

• The tool provides configurable workflows for task assignments and review cycles. This is a more structured approach than the content assembly focus of Bricks.ai.

Loopio's Limitations Compared to Bricks.ai

• Loopio is designed for structured documents like RFPs. This focus can be a limitation for sales teams that need to create a wider variety of materials, such as marketing presentations or custom sales proposals, which is a core function of Bricks.ai.

• The tool's workflow centers on automating answers for questionnaires. This process is different from Bricks.ai, where users build documents by combining various content blocks. Some teams may find this less suitable for creating narrative-heavy proposals.

• Its content library is built to store and reuse answers for RFPs. This is less of a central asset hub for general company content compared to Bricks.ai, which connects different departments to pull approved brand assets for any sales document.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Loopio, like Bricks.ai, does not publish its pricing and operates on a custom quote model. For specific details, you will need to contact the company directly through Loopio's official website.

8) RFPIO

RFPIO is a response management platform that centralizes information for teams. It assists with responses to RFPs, security questionnaires, and other formal requests. The system uses a content library to build documents, including sales presentations, which ensures consistency across materials.

RFPIO's Main Features

• The platform includes a questions library to store and reuse approved content for responses.

• It generates various request documents (RFX) using customizable templates and variables.

• The system manages user permissions with role-based access controls and platform administration tools.

• It sends alerts and notifications to keep collaborators informed about workflow progress.

RFPIO vs. Bricks.ai: A Comparison

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 1,162 G2 reviews.

• RFPIO is built for response management, such as RFPs and security questionnaires. This is a more specialized function compared to Bricks.ai's general document assembly for sales proposals.

• The platform includes a question library to store and reuse approved answers for formal requests. This differs from Bricks.ai, which uses a broader content library for assembling various sales documents from content blocks.

• It provides role-based access controls to manage user permissions for content. This offers a more granular approach to administration than the general content access in Bricks.ai's asset library.

• The tool sends automatic alerts and notifications to keep collaborators updated on workflow progress. This is a more structured process compared to Bricks.ai's focus on the initial document creation stage.

RFPIO's Limitations Compared to Bricks.ai

• RFPIO does not offer a central library for general company content assets. This is different from Bricks.ai, which connects departments to pull approved brand materials. This might make it harder to maintain brand consistency across diverse sales documents beyond formal RFPs.

• The platform's workflow is built around templates for formal responses. This can be less flexible than Bricks.ai's approach, where users build proposals by combining various pre-approved content blocks for a more custom document.

• Some users report that the tool has a steep learning curve. This approach is different from Bricks.ai, which is designed for sales teams to quickly assemble documents with minimal technical knowledge.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

RFPIO, like Bricks.ai, operates on a custom quote model and does not publish its pricing. For specific details, you will need to contact the company through RFPIO's official website.

9) Templafy

Templafy is a content enablement platform that connects content to users where they work. It helps teams create on-brand, compliant business documents like presentations. The platform integrates with Microsoft Office and Google Workspace, giving sales teams access to approved templates and assets directly within their workflow.

Templafy's Main Features

• Manages user, role, and access permissions for administrative control.

• Integrates and embeds content within various business applications.

• Offers a suggestion mode to assist with document editing and revision.

• Supports web publishing and allows for the export or import of multiple file types.

Templafy vs. Bricks.ai: A Comparison

Average Review score: 4.3/5 stars based on 48 G2 reviews.

• Templafy integrates directly into applications like Microsoft Office and Google Workspace. This differs from Bricks.ai, which is a standalone platform, and lets users work within their existing tools.

• It offers a suggestion mode to assist with document editing. This provides active guidance during creation, a feature not found in Bricks.ai's block assembly workflow.

• The platform provides detailed user, role, and access management. This gives administrators more granular control over content compared to the broader library access in Bricks.ai.

• This tool supports web publishing and can import or export multiple file types. This offers more output flexibility than Bricks.ai, which focuses on generating documents from internal content blocks.

Templafy's Limitations Compared to Bricks.ai

• Templafy's workflow centers on using company templates within applications like Microsoft Office. This approach can be less flexible than Bricks.ai, where users build documents by combining various content blocks for a more custom proposal.

• The tool's content library serves a broad purpose across the entire organization. This is different from Bricks.ai, which provides a library specifically designed for sales teams to quickly assemble proposals from modular content pieces.

• Its focus on deep integration and administrative controls can sometimes introduce complexity. This contrasts with Bricks.ai's design, which allows sales reps to assemble documents from a content library with fewer technical steps.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Templafy, like Bricks.ai, operates on a custom quote model and does not publish its pricing. For specific details, you will need to contact the company through Templafy's official website.

10) Seismic

Seismic is a sales enablement platform. It equips customer-facing teams with content and insights, and aligns go-to-market teams from a central content location.

Sales teams use the platform to build presentations and other collateral. The system helps them find the right content for each buyer and personalize it at scale.

Seismic's Main Features

• Tracks content engagement and provides deal analytics for sales insights.

• Supports live, mobile, and screenshare presentations directly from the platform.

• Offers tools and analytics specifically for account-based engagement.

• Generates reports, dashboards, and alerts to monitor content performance and user activity.

Seismic vs. Bricks.ai: A Comparison

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 1,615 G2 reviews.

• Seismic provides detailed deal analytics and content engagement tracking. This offers deeper sales insights compared to Bricks.ai, which focuses on the initial document creation.

• The platform supports live presentations and screensharing. This is a different function from Bricks.ai, which primarily generates documents for later use.

• It includes specific tools and analytics for account-based engagement. This provides a more targeted sales approach than the general document personalization in Bricks.ai.

• This tool generates reports and dashboards to monitor content performance. This level of analysis extends beyond the document assembly focus of Bricks.ai.

Seismic's Limitations Compared to Bricks.ai

• Seismic is a comprehensive enablement platform. Some teams may find its scope too broad if they only need to assemble documents from content blocks, which is the core function of Bricks.ai.

• The platform's workflow centers on finding and personalizing existing content. This can be less flexible than Bricks.ai's approach, where users build new documents by combining various pre-approved content blocks.

• It is a large system that can be complex to set up. This is different from Bricks.ai, which is designed for sales teams to quickly create documents with a more straightforward adoption process.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Seismic, similar to Bricks.ai, does not publish its pricing and uses a custom quote model. For specific details, you will need to contact the company through Seismic's official website.

Which One Should You Go With?

Choosing a Bricks.ai alternative depends on many variables specific to your team's needs. This guide has provided several options to help inform your decision.

If your needs go beyond document creation, consider 11x for sales process automation. Its digital workers manage tasks from research to outreach, which can free up your sales team to focus on closing deals.