Covideo Alternatives

Many teams use Covideo for its straightforward video recording and sharing. It’s praised for its simple interface, mobile app, and CRM integrations, which help add a personal touch to sales and marketing outreach.

However, some users note drawbacks like performance issues on weak connections and limited template customization. We've analyzed the top alternatives based on G2 reviews to help you find a better fit for your needs. Let's get started.

Consider 11x for Digital Sales Workers

If your team is exploring digital workers to handle parts of the sales process, 11x offers a solution. It provides autonomous agents that can manage tasks like outreach and follow-ups, which may complement your existing sales strategy.

11x is a GTM platform that uses AI agents to manage the sales process. Its agent, Alice, finds prospects, runs outreach on email and LinkedIn, and keeps the CRM updated.

Another agent, Julian, qualifies inbound leads and books meetings. The platform consolidates functions like data enrichment, outreach, and email warmup, removing the need for multiple separate tools.

Covideo Alternatives

The following section details the top Covideo alternatives. We analyze each tool's pricing, main features, and its advantages and drawbacks compared to Covideo.

1) BombBomb

BombBomb is a video-messaging platform that lets teams record, send, and track personal videos within emails. It facilitates face-to-face communication at scale. The platform is for sales, marketing, and customer success teams to increase response rates, shorten sales cycles, and convert more leads.

Use cases include humanizing a brand and turning support tickets into conversations. The company reports that customers see higher email open rates and more lead conversions.

BombBomb's Main Features

• Offers automated outreach campaigns with smart assignment and fallback logic through its Copilot Automated Workflows feature.

• Provides content management tools to organize videos using labels, user permissions, and dedicated team workspaces.

• Features a single analytics dashboard to monitor video views, audience engagement, and overall team performance.

• Ensures enterprise-grade security with SOC 2 Type II compliance, single sign-on (SSO), and role-based access control (RBAC).

Where BombBomb Outshines Covideo

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 583 G2 reviews.

• BombBomb provides automated outreach campaigns with smart assignment logic. This feature supports more complex, scaled communication than Covideo's more manual outreach process.

• It offers enterprise-grade security features like SOC 2 Type II compliance and single sign-on. This provides a higher level of data protection compared to the standard security measures in Covideo.

• The platform includes a unified analytics dashboard to monitor team-wide performance. This offers a more comprehensive view of engagement metrics than the individual video reports in Covideo.

• Advanced content management is available with team workspaces and user permissions. This allows for better organization of video assets, a more structured approach than Covideo's simpler library.

BombBomb vs. Covideo: Potential Drawbacks

• BombBomb's pricing plans can be a consideration for smaller teams. Some users find its cost is higher compared to Covideo, which may offer more budget-friendly options for basic video messaging.

• The tool provides basic video editing functions. To add custom branding overlays or perform complex trims, users might need a separate application, a step that may not be necessary with Covideo's workflow.

• It sometimes presents integration challenges with certain CRMs, according to user feedback. This can lead to workflow disruptions, an issue less commonly associated with Covideo’s direct connections.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

While we've covered key features and use cases in this comparison, pricing models can vary significantly between tools. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Vidyard's official website. Check the detailed pricing of Vidyard on Vidyard's website.

2) Vidyard

Vidyard is a video platform for revenue teams to engage prospects and close deals. It lets users create, personalize, and track video messages at scale. The tool supports sales outreach, marketing content, and internal corporate communications.

Companies like LinkedIn and Salesforce use it to connect with buyers. Use cases include prospect outreach, sales support, and the conversion of leads into customers through video.

Vidyard's Main Features

• Gives every representative an AI Avatar that automatically sends personalized videos and automates sales workflows.

• Provides a central library to upload, organize, and track all video assets with real-time engagement analytics.

• Offers native connections to CRMs like Salesforce and HubSpot, pushing engagement data directly into existing tools.

• Records and sends personalized videos with detailed viewer analytics for performance insight and central governance.

Where Vidyard Outshines Covideo

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 808 G2 reviews.

• Vidyard provides an AI Video Sales Agent to automate personalized video outreach. This allows for scaled communication based on customer actions, a more advanced feature compared to Covideo's manual recording and sending process.

• It offers native integrations that push detailed viewer engagement data directly into CRMs like Salesforce. This provides deeper insights than the individual video reports typically found in Covideo.

• The tool allows users to embed calls-to-action directly within videos. This feature helps guide viewer actions more effectively than the standard video playback offered by Covideo.

• Vidyard has a free plan that allows users to test core features without a financial commitment. This provides an entry point that may not be available with Covideo, which focuses on paid subscriptions.

Vidyard vs. Covideo: Potential Drawbacks

• Some users find the video editing functions in Vidyard less direct. This may require more steps for simple trims, unlike the straightforward editing process available in Covideo.

• Users sometimes report a camera or voice delay when they switch browser tabs during a recording. This can disrupt the flow of a presentation, an issue that may be less frequent in simpler recording tools.

• The platform's free and lower-tier plans include limits on the number of videos. Active teams might reach their quota quickly and may need an earlier upgrade compared to the subscription structures of a tool like Covideo.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Vidyard offers a free plan, making it more accessible than Covideo for users who want to test the service without a financial commitment. Its paid Starter plan is $59 per user per month, providing a clear entry point for individuals. Covideo does not list public pricing, requiring potential customers to request a demo.

3) Loom

Loom is a video messaging platform to record a screen, camera, or both. Users share videos to communicate with teammates and customers. It is used by over 400,000 companies and has an enterprise edition for secure administration.

Use cases include personalized sales outreach, visual context for code reviews, and faster issue resolution for customer support. The tool helps teams share ideas and document processes with video.

Loom's Main Features

• Uses AI for automatic video enhancement and to convert scripts into documents, messages, or bug reports.

• Includes a video editor to trim, stitch, and add custom backgrounds, text, arrows, or box overlays.

• Provides viewer engagement tools like emojis, comments, and calls-to-action, with transcripts and captions in over 50 languages.

• Supports enterprise security with SSO, SCIM, custom data-retention policies, and granular privacy controls.

Where Loom Outshines Covideo

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 2,119 G2 reviews.

• Loom uses AI to automatically enhance videos and generate text from video content. This provides a level of automation not present in Covideo's manual workflow.

• Its video editor allows users to stitch clips and add custom overlays. This offers more advanced editing options compared to the simpler functions in Covideo.

• The platform includes viewer engagement tools like comments and emojis, plus automatic captions in over 50 languages. This makes content more interactive and accessible than a standard Covideo message.

• A free starter plan is available, which lets teams test core features without a subscription. Covideo, in contrast, focuses on paid plans and requires a demo for access.

Loom vs. Covideo: Potential Drawbacks

• Loom is designed for broad team communication, so its features may not be as specialized for sales outreach compared to Covideo. Some sales teams might find Covideo's workflow more aligned with their specific prospecting and follow-up needs.

• The tool offers more editing options, but some users report this can make simple tasks more complex. Covideo, in contrast, provides a more direct editing experience that may be faster for basic trims and adjustments.

• It sometimes has recording issues, like glitches or lag, according to user feedback. For teams that need very reliable recording for client-facing messages, Covideo's simpler platform might offer a more consistent experience.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Loom offers transparent pricing with a free starter plan and a Business plan at $15 per user per month. In contrast, Covideo does not list public pricing and requires a demo for a custom quote. This makes Loom more accessible for individuals and small teams, while Covideo's model is geared toward enterprises that need a tailored package.

4) Hippo Video

Hippo Video is a video platform for sales, marketing, and support teams. It allows users to create, share, and track personalized videos and screen recordings. The tool supports various business communications, from sales prospecting to customer support.

Use cases include video email campaigns and personalized outreach. The platform provides analytics to measure video performance and viewer engagement, helping teams assess their content's impact.

Hippo Video's Main Features

• Its Agentic AI converts text, presentations, or prompts into complete videos with scripts, scenes, and lifelike AI avatars in over 30 languages.

• The platform creates a "Digital Twin," an AI avatar that mirrors a user's voice and gestures to automate personalized demos and support videos.

• It offers a video chatbot that functions as an always-on, real-time video assistant to answer customer questions.

• The tool provides an SDK and API for embedding video creation, editing, and playback functionalities directly within a company's own products.

Where Hippo Video Outshines Covideo

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 734 G2 reviews.

• Hippo Video uses AI to create videos from text and generate lifelike avatars. This automates content creation, a feature not available in Covideo's manual recording workflow.

• It provides an SDK and API to embed video functions directly into a company's own products. This allows for deeper platform customization compared to Covideo's standard integrations.

• The tool includes a video chatbot to answer customer questions in real time. This offers an interactive support channel, which is different from Covideo's one-way video messaging.

• Users can add interactive elements like forms and polls directly into videos. This feature can increase viewer engagement more than the standard video playback in Covideo.

Hippo Video vs. Covideo: Potential Drawbacks

• Some users find Hippo Video's interface less intuitive compared to Covideo's straightforward design. The platform's advanced options can present a learning curve, which might slow down teams that need a simple, ready-to-use tool.

• The tool sometimes has compatibility issues, as some users note it does not work well on Safari or has limitations on the iPad app. This can be a drawback for teams that rely on those platforms for daily work.

• Its video editing functions can feel complex for simple tasks. Users who need quick trims might find Covideo's direct editing process faster than the multiple options available in Hippo Video.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Hippo Video offers transparent pricing with a free plan and paid tiers starting at $20 per user per month. In contrast, Covideo does not list public pricing and requires a demo for a custom quote. This makes Hippo Video more accessible for teams wanting upfront costs, while Covideo’s model suits enterprises.

5) Dubb

Dubb is a video communication platform for sales and marketing teams. It provides tools for video creation, distribution, and analytics. The platform helps businesses connect with clients through personal video messages.

Sales teams use it for prospect outreach and follow-ups. Marketers apply it to email campaigns, while support staff use it for customer assistance. It also serves internal communication needs.

Dubb's Main Features

• Offers an AI suite with a sales assistant for next-step recommendations, copywriting help, and video performance analysis.

• Includes a mobile app with a built-in teleprompter for recording videos with multiple clips.

• Distributes video through personalized emails, SMS, LinkedIn messages, and one-click posts to social media.

• Generates narrated screen recordings or faceless videos from text prompts using its AI tools.

Where Dubb Outshines Covideo

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 555 G2 reviews.

• Dubb includes an AI sales assistant that provides next-step recommendations. This offers a layer of guided selling that is different from Covideo's more manual outreach process.

• Its mobile app features a built-in teleprompter for scripted recordings. This tool helps create more polished videos on the go, a feature not standard in Covideo's mobile application.

• The platform allows video distribution through multiple channels, including SMS and LinkedIn. This provides more outreach options compared to Covideo, which focuses mainly on email communication.

• Dubb can generate faceless, narrated videos directly from text prompts. This automates content creation for users who do not want to be on camera, an alternative to Covideo's camera-first recording approach.

Dubb vs. Covideo: Potential Drawbacks

• Some users find Dubb's interface has a steeper learning curve. This is different from Covideo's design, which is often noted for its simplicity and ease of use for new teams.

• The platform's video editing tools can feel complex for quick adjustments. In comparison, Covideo offers a more direct process that some teams may find faster for simple trims.

• Users sometimes report delays or video playback issues. This can be a consideration for teams that need high reliability, where Covideo's simpler platform might provide a more consistent experience.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Dubb provides transparent pricing with a Pro plan at $59 per user per month, while Covideo requires a demo for a custom quote. This makes Dubb a more direct choice for teams needing clear costs, whereas Covideo’s approach is tailored for enterprise clients.

Try 11x for AI-Powered Sales

For teams interested in digital sales workers, 11x provides AI agents for outreach and lead qualification. The platform is designed to support your sales staff by taking over routine tasks.

This lets your team concentrate on closing deals. Learn more about how its AI agents operate on the 11x website.

With 11x, we use AI to manage the sales process. Our agent Alice identifies accounts and runs outreach, while Julian qualifies leads and books meetings. We combine data enrichment, outreach, and email warmup into a single platform, removing the need for separate tools.

Book a demo to see how our AI agents can support your team.

6) Sendspark

Sendspark is a video platform that helps businesses create and share personal videos with customers. Teams use it for video emails and messages to support sales outreach and customer tutorials. It also allows for screen records to resolve support tickets and for internal team updates.

Sendspark's Main Features

• The platform uses AI to personalize a base video at scale; it clones the presenter’s voice and inserts each recipient’s name.

• It lets users stitch a new introduction onto a pre-recorded video, which allows for rapid personalization.

• Users can build custom landing pages that include branded text, calls-to-action, and an embedded calendar for direct meeting scheduling.

• The tool provides automated workflows to trigger video creation and distribution based on specific user actions.

Where Sendspark Outshines Covideo

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 370 G2 reviews.

• Sendspark uses AI to personalize a base video at scale by inserting the recipient’s name. This provides a level of automation for outreach that is different from Covideo's manual recording process for each video.

• The tool allows users to stitch a new introduction onto a pre-recorded video for quick personalization. This workflow is more efficient compared to re-recording an entire message, which may be necessary with Covideo.

• It lets users build custom landing pages with their own branding and an embedded calendar. This offers more control over the viewing experience than the standard sharing pages in Covideo.

• Sendspark includes a feature to request and collect videos from customers, who can record without installing anything. This function for gathering user-generated content is not a primary feature of Covideo.

Sendspark vs. Covideo: Potential Drawbacks

• Some users report that Sendspark can have longer video processing times. For teams that need to send videos immediately after recording, Covideo's platform might offer a faster turnaround.

• The tool's customer support hours are sometimes limited for teams outside of North America. This can be a challenge for global companies that require immediate assistance, which may differ from Covideo's support structure.

• It can occasionally be difficult to downgrade or cancel a subscription plan. In contrast, Covideo's sales-assisted model may provide a more direct process for managing account changes.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Sendspark offers transparent pricing on its website, making it more accessible for users who want to see costs upfront. In contrast, Covideo does not list public pricing and requires potential customers to request a demo for a custom quote.

7) OneMob

OneMob is a video platform that provides tools for screen and video recording. It allows business teams to create and share video content for sales outreach, marketing, and customer support. The service helps teams connect with clients through personal video messages and track engagement.

OneMob's Main Features

• It provides an omnichannel campaign builder to coordinate email, video, microsites, and social media touches from a single console.

• The platform includes a drag-and-drop builder for creating microsites that host videos, documents, and calls-to-action.

• It offers dynamic lead prioritization, using real-time analytics to identify engaged prospects and send instant alerts to sales representatives.

• The tool allows for flexible campaign management, where marketing can run campaigns while sales teams receive engagement alerts and lead lists.

Where OneMob Outshines Covideo

Average Review score: 4.9/5 stars based on 143 G2 reviews.

• OneMob provides an omnichannel campaign builder to coordinate email, video, and social media. This offers more outreach channels than Covideo, which focuses primarily on video email.

• It includes a drag-and-drop builder for creating microsites that host videos and documents. This allows for a more comprehensive content experience compared to the standard video landing pages in Covideo.

• The platform offers dynamic lead prioritization with real-time alerts for sales. This is a more advanced way to identify engaged prospects than the individual video engagement reports in Covideo.

• Its campaign management feature allows marketing to run campaigns while sales receives lead lists. This supports a more coordinated team effort, which is different from Covideo's individual user workflow.

OneMob vs. Covideo: Potential Drawbacks

• OneMob has a broad feature set, which can create a learning curve for new users. In comparison, Covideo's simple interface may allow for faster team adoption for basic video tasks.

• The platform's all-in-one design might feel less focused than Covideo's. Teams that only need video email may find Covideo's dedicated workflow more direct for their specific tasks.

• Some users note limited design options for advanced features like microsite buttons. In contrast, Covideo provides a more standardized and simple landing page experience that requires less setup.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

OneMob offers transparent pricing with a free plan, a Pro plan at $25 per user per month, and an Enterprise plan starting at $50. In contrast, Covideo requires a demo for a custom quote and does not list public pricing. This makes OneMob a more direct option for teams that need clear costs, while Covideo's approach is geared toward enterprises needing a tailored solution.

8) Bonjoro

Bonjoro allows teams to send personal video messages to customers. Businesses use the platform to build relationships and improve user retention. Use cases include personalized welcome videos, sales follow-ups, and customer thank-yous. It adds a human touch to digital outreach and support.

Bonjoro's Main Features

• Provides a mobile application to record and send personal videos to customers.

• Connects with existing CRM and email marketing tools to send videos based on customer actions.

• Delivers videos with a message directly to a customer’s email inbox.

• Allows users to upload pre-recorded videos to the platform for distribution.

Where Bonjoro Outshines Covideo

Average Review score: 4.8/5 stars based on 57 G2 reviews.

• Bonjoro connects with CRMs to create video tasks based on specific customer actions. This is different from Covideo, where video creation is a more manual process initiated by the user.

• Its mobile application focuses on quickly recording and sending personal videos. This provides a simple mobile workflow compared to Covideo's app, which supports a wider range of functions.

• The platform is built for specific touchpoints like sending welcome videos to new users. This is a more specialized approach than Covideo’s broader use in general sales and marketing outreach.

• This tool emphasizes building customer relationships through highly personal, one-off videos. Covideo also supports personalization but is often applied to wider sales campaigns.

Bonjoro vs. Covideo: Potential Drawbacks

• Bonjoro provides limited video customization options. Adding branded elements or interactive calls-to-action can be more difficult compared to Covideo, as the platform prioritizes simple, personal messages.

• The tool is highly specialized for one-off personal messages like welcomes or thank-yous. Teams that need a solution for the entire sales cycle might find Covideo's broader feature set more aligned with general outreach.

• Its analytics focus on basic engagement tracking. In contrast, Covideo may offer more detailed reports on individual video performance, a consideration for teams that use data to guide sales strategy.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Bonjoro offers transparent pricing with a free plan and paid tiers starting at $19 per user per month. In contrast, Covideo does not list public pricing and requires a demo for a custom quote. This makes Bonjoro more accessible for teams that need clear, upfront costs, while Covideo’s model is better suited for enterprises.

9) Biteable

Biteable is a video platform for teams to create professional videos. It provides tools to record a screen or camera, plus a collection of templates and animations. Companies use it for marketing, internal updates, and employee instruction.

Use cases include advertisements, social media content, and explainer videos. The service helps teams produce video content without a need for large production budgets or special skills.

Biteable's Main Features

• Offers a variety of animations and characters for creating video content.

• Includes an AI voiceover function for video narration.

• Functions as an online maker for creating videos and animations.

Where Biteable Outshines Covideo

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 26 G2 reviews.

• Biteable provides a wide range of animations and characters to create video content. This allows users to produce animated explainer videos, a feature not available in Covideo, which is built for personal camera recordings.

• It includes an AI voiceover function for video narration. This offers a different way to create audio tracks compared to Covideo, where users typically record their own voice for each message.

• The tool focuses on creating professional videos with templates for marketing and social media. This contrasts with Covideo's primary use for one-to-one sales outreach and offers a solution for teams that need polished, branded content.

• Its template-driven editor makes it simple to produce high-quality animated videos without prior experience. Covideo is also easy to use, but for a different purpose: quick, personal screen and camera recordings.

Biteable vs. Covideo: Potential Drawbacks

• Biteable focuses on creating animated marketing content. This is different from Covideo, which is built for personal, one-to-one video messages for sales outreach.

• The tool's template-based system can sometimes limit options for highly personalized sales videos. In comparison, Covideo's direct recording allows for more specific and individual communication.

• It is not designed as a sales engagement tool. As a result, it may not have the same CRM integrations for tracking prospect activity that are central to the Covideo platform.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Biteable requires users to visit its website for pricing information, as it is not publicly listed. In contrast, Covideo also requires direct contact, asking potential customers to request a demo for a custom quote.

10) CloudApp

CloudApp provides a platform for visual communication through screen captures. Users can record their screen, create GIFs, and annotate screenshots to share information quickly. It is a tool for teams that need to show, not just tell.

Common uses involve customer support responses, sales outreach, and engineering bug reports. The application helps teams provide clear context and reduce back-and-forth communication for many business tasks.

CloudApp's Main Features

• Offers competition templates and supports custom and team-based competitions.

• Integrates with CRM systems and social collaboration tools.

• Includes reporting capabilities and tools for user, role, and access management.

• Provides a TV streaming function for broadcasting data or competitions.

Where CloudApp Outshines Covideo

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 23 G2 reviews.

• CloudApp uses AI to analyze CRM data and provide deal predictions. This offers a layer of sales intelligence that is different from Covideo's focus on manual video messaging.

• The platform includes competition templates and team-based contests to motivate sales teams. This gamification approach is a feature not found in Covideo, which centers on communication tools.

• It offers deep CRM integration that automates data capture and provides actionable insights. This is a more advanced function compared to Covideo's integration, which primarily tracks video engagement.

• The tool provides a TV streaming function to broadcast sales data or competitions. This feature for public display of performance metrics is distinct from Covideo's private video sharing capabilities.

CloudApp vs. Covideo: Potential Drawbacks

• CloudApp is designed for general visual communication. This is different from Covideo, which offers specialized features for sales teams, such as video email templates and specific outreach workflows.

• The platform provides basic analytics like view counts. In comparison, Covideo often gives more detailed reports on individual viewer engagement, which helps sales teams identify interested prospects for follow-up.

• It focuses on quick, one-off screen recordings. Some teams might find it has fewer options to personalize video landing pages with custom branding and calls-to-action compared to the features available in Covideo.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

CloudApp offers its Revenue Intelligence Platform starting at £60 per year for 50 users. In contrast, Covideo does not provide public pricing and requires a demo for a custom quote. This makes CloudApp's entry point clear for larger teams, while Covideo’s model is tailored to individual enterprise needs.

Which One Should You Go With?

Choosing a Covideo alternative depends on many factors, including your team's specific needs and budget. This guide has detailed several options to help you make an informed decision for your business.

If your goal is to automate parts of the sales process, consider 11x. Its AI agents can handle tasks like outreach and lead qualification, allowing your sales team to focus on closing deals and strategic work.