Loom Alternatives

You've likely used Loom for good reasons. It’s a solid choice for quick screen recordings and video messages. The tool performs well when you need to share fast updates or walk a colleague through a task, cutting down on long emails and meetings.

Despite its strengths, some users find the editing features basic or note occasional performance issues. We've identified the best alternatives to Loom and analyzed their advantages and drawbacks based on G2 reviews to help you shortlist options for a deeper review. Let's get started.

Consider 11x for Sales Automation

If you want to automate sales tasks, 11x offers digital workers for outreach and follow-ups. This lets your sales team concentrate on final negotiations and helps scale your operations. It is a relevant choice for teams interested in digital labor for sales.

11x is a GTM platform that uses AI agents to manage the sales process. Our agent, Alice, sources high-intent prospects, handles outreach on email and LinkedIn, and keeps your CRM current. Julian qualifies inbound leads and books meetings.

We replace separate tools for data enrichment, outreach, and email warmup by combining these functions into one platform.

Loom Alternatives

Here is a detailed review of the top Loom alternatives. We analyze each tool's pricing, features, and specific advantages and drawbacks when compared to Loom.

1) Vidyard

Vidyard is an AI-powered video platform for revenue teams. It allows users to create, personalize, and track video messages at scale to engage prospects and close deals faster. Over 100,000 teams use the platform.

Its main uses are to prospect for sales, nurture demand through marketing, and deliver corporate communications.

Vidyard's Main Features

• Sends personalized videos automatically with an AI Avatar and automates repetitive sales workflows.
• Connects natively with tools like Salesforce and HubSpot, pushing engagement data directly into your CRM.
• Triggers the Video Agent to send automatic follow-up videos based on real-time engagement analytics.
• Offers AI Avatars and an AI Script Generator as add-on products for creating videos at scale.

How Vidyard Compares to Loom

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 808 G2 reviews.

• Vidyard offers a Video Sales Agent to automate personalized video outreach and follow-ups. This is different from Loom, which is built for manual, one-off recordings.
• It provides deeper CRM integrations with platforms like Salesforce, sending detailed engagement analytics directly. Loom's integrations are generally less focused on sales-specific data workflows.
• The platform's analytics track viewer drop-off rates and other engagement metrics to identify high-intent leads. This level of detail is more advanced compared to Loom's basic view tracking.
• This tool allows for creating personalized videos at scale with an AI Script Generator. In comparison, Loom is primarily used for creating individual video messages.

Where Vidyard Falls Short Compared to Loom

• Vidyard offers limited in-app editing options compared to Loom. Some users find the editing process difficult for tasks that require more than simple trims, which can make polishing videos more time-consuming.
• It lacks visual customization features like virtual backgrounds or green-screen effects. This is different from Loom, which provides these options to help create a more professional appearance in recordings.
• Some users report occasional performance issues, such as a delay between the camera and audio when switching browser tabs. This might affect the final quality of the screen recording.

Budget and Cost Considerations

Vidyard offers a free plan and a paid Starter plan at $59 per user per month. This price point reflects its focus on sales teams with features like automation and deep CRM integrations, which are not the primary focus of Loom's more general-use platform.

2) CloudApp

CloudApp is a visual communication platform to capture screens, create GIFs, and annotate images. Teams use it for customer support, sales, and internal collaboration. It helps share information with speed and clarity, and can reduce the need for long text explanations or meetings.

CloudApp's Main Features

• Captures screen content as still images for quick sharing.
• Creates animated GIFs from screen recordings.
• Annotates captured images to add context or highlight information.

How CloudApp Compares to Loom

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 23 G2 reviews.

• CloudApp includes gamification features to motivate sales teams and improve CRM data quality. This is a function not present in Loom, which focuses on video messaging.
• It uses AI to analyze CRM data for accurate sales forecasts and deal predictions. In comparison, Loom is a tool for video creation and lacks predictive analytics.
• The tool integrates deeply with Salesforce as an AppExchange Partner. This provides advanced sales intelligence, while Loom's integrations are built for video distribution.
• This platform gives sales managers performance insights for effective team coaching. Loom can be used to share feedback but does not have specific analytics for sales coaching.

Where CloudApp Falls Short Compared to Loom

• CloudApp provides more basic video editing functions than Loom. Some users report that the tool is better for quick trims rather than for more detailed video adjustments.
• It does not offer visual recording features like virtual backgrounds. This is different from Loom, which includes these options to help create a more polished look.
• The platform lacks collaborative tools such as time-stamped comments and emoji reactions on the video player. This can make Loom a better option for teams that need to give specific feedback on a recording.

Budget and Cost Considerations

CloudApp's pricing starts at £60.00 for 50 users per year, a model designed for enterprise sales teams. This contrasts with Loom's typical per-user pricing, which can be more suitable for individuals or smaller teams who do not require advanced sales intelligence features.

3) Screencastify

Screencastify is a browser-based platform to record, edit, and share interactive video content. It is a simple screen-casting tool that works on Chromebooks and other devices. The platform supports engagement and accessibility in education and business through features like AI-powered translations.

Common uses include the creation of lessons, student video assignments, and business walkthroughs. Users can also add interactive, auto-graded questions to any video to check comprehension.

Screencastify's Main Features

• Adds interactive, auto-graded questions to any video to check comprehension.
• Collects video assignments from students through a feature called Submit.
• Translates video captions into more than 50 languages with an AI assistant.
• Generates titles, descriptions, and captions for videos with a single click.

How Screencastify Compares to Loom

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 70 G2 reviews.

• Screencastify adds interactive, auto-graded questions to videos to check viewer comprehension, a feature not available in Loom.
• The platform includes a feature to collect video assignments from viewers. This is different from Loom, which is built for general communication rather than structured educational tasks.
• It provides AI-powered translation for video captions into many languages, making content more accessible compared to Loom's standard captioning.
• This tool automatically saves recordings to Google Drive, which offers a different workflow compared to Loom's native cloud storage.

Where Screencastify Falls Short Compared to Loom

• Screencastify offers more basic video editing functions, which are mainly for simple trims. In comparison, Loom provides a slightly more robust set of editing tools that allow for more polished final videos without needing external software.
• The platform does not have collaborative features like time-stamped comments or emoji reactions. This can make Loom a more practical option for teams that need to give and receive specific feedback directly on a video.
• Some users note that the free version has significant limitations. This is different from Loom, whose free plan is often considered more generous for individuals or small teams just starting with video messaging.

Budget and Cost Considerations

While we've covered key features and use cases in this comparison, pricing models can vary significantly between tools. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Screencastify's official website.

4) Snagit

Snagit is a tool for screen capture and video creation. It lets users take screenshots and record their screen. The software has features to edit images and build visual documentation from captures.

Common uses include tutorials, feedback, and the creation of instructional materials. It helps teams communicate information with annotated images and short videos.

Snagit's Main Features

• Captures scrolling areas, such as entire web pages or long chat threads, in a single image.
• Detects individual UI elements within a screenshot, allowing them to be rearranged or deleted.
• Recognizes text inside images, letting users edit the font, size, and color using OCR.
• Converts screenshots into simplified UI graphics by removing visual clutter.

How Snagit Compares to Loom

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 5,636 G2 reviews.

• Snagit captures entire scrolling areas, like long web pages, into a single image. This is different from Loom, which records a video of the scrolling action.
• The tool recognizes text within screenshots, which allows you to edit it directly. Loom does not offer a similar text extraction feature for its video content.
• It has advanced image editing features, such as the ability to detect and move UI elements in a screenshot. This provides more control over static images than Loom's video-focused editing tools.
• Unlike Loom, Snagit can convert a busy screenshot into a simplified graphic. This helps create clean-looking instructional materials by removing visual distractions.

Where Snagit Falls Short Compared to Loom

• Snagit does not have collaborative feedback tools on the video player. This is different from Loom, where teams can leave time-stamped comments and emoji reactions, which helps to gather specific feedback on a recording.
• The tool does not provide video engagement analytics. In contrast, Loom tracks viewer data to provide insights that are useful for sales and client communication.
• Its user experience is built around both image and video capture. For users who only need to record and share quick videos, Loom's interface might feel more direct as it is designed specifically for that single purpose.

Budget and Cost Considerations

Snagit's business plan is priced at $48 per user per year. This annual subscription model can be more cost-effective for stable teams compared to Loom's typical per-user, monthly billing, which offers more flexibility for teams with changing sizes.

5) Camtasia

Camtasia is a software application to record screens and edit video. People use it to create video tutorials, software demonstrations, and instructional content. The tool combines screen capture with a video editor to produce polished videos for education or marketing.

It is a choice for teams that need more than simple screen capture and require advanced edit functions for their projects.

Camtasia's Main Features

• Records the screen, webcam, microphone, and system audio on separate tracks.
• Generates scripts and voice narration using AI tools.
• Includes a built-in library of royalty-free music, video clips, and other stock assets.
• Removes a color from the background with a chroma-key effect.

How Camtasia Compares to Loom

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 1,598 G2 reviews.

• Camtasia offers more advanced video editing capabilities than Loom. It records the screen, webcam, and audio on separate tracks, which gives users more control during post-production.
• The tool includes AI features to generate scripts and voice narration. This is different from Loom, which is designed for more spontaneous, unscripted video messages.
• It provides a built-in library of royalty-free music and stock assets. This helps users create more polished videos without sourcing content externally, a feature not available in Loom.
• Camtasia has a chroma-key effect to remove and replace video backgrounds. This allows for more customized background replacement compared to Loom's virtual background options.

Where Camtasia Falls Short Compared To Loom

• The software has a steeper learning curve compared to Loom. Some users find it complex for simple, quick video messages, as it is a tool for detailed video production.
• It operates as a desktop application, so users must render and upload videos to share them. This process is different from Loom, where videos are available instantly in the cloud via a shareable link.
• Camtasia can be resource-intensive and may cause performance issues with large files. This is less of a concern with Loom, as its video processing happens in the cloud, not on the user's device.

Budget and Cost Considerations

Camtasia offers annual plans, with its Essentials tier priced at $179.88 per year. This annual license model contrasts with Loom's typical monthly per-user subscription, making Camtasia a more predictable, one-time expense for teams that require its advanced editing features for long-term use.

Try 11x for Sales Automation

If you want to automate sales functions, 11x offers a platform with digital workers. These agents handle outreach, qualify leads, and manage your CRM. This approach lets your sales team concentrate on closing deals. Explore 11x for your sales automation needs.

Try 11x for Sales Automation

With 11x, our AI agents run your sales playbook. Alice finds accounts, enriches their data, and handles outreach. Julian qualifies prospects on calls and books meetings. We replace separate tools for intent data and email warmup by combining them into one platform.

Book a demo to see our platform in action.

6) BombBomb

BombBomb is a video messaging platform for sales professionals. It allows users to record and send personal videos from a computer or phone. The tool helps build relationships with prospects and clients through face-to-face communication, which adds a personal touch to digital messages.

Common applications include sales outreach, lead follow-up, and customer service updates. It integrates with email clients and CRMs to fit into existing workflows.

BombBomb's Main Features

• Automates outreach campaigns with smart assignment and fallback logic through a feature called Copilot.
• Organizes videos with labels and permissions in team workspaces.
• Applies custom branding to video player pages at a company or team level.
• Creates call-to-action pages to guide viewer next steps.

How BombBomb Compares to Loom

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 583 G2 reviews.

• BombBomb offers a Copilot feature to automate video outreach campaigns. This is different from Loom, which is designed for manual, one-off video messages.
• It allows for custom branding on video player pages at a company or team level. This provides more brand consistency compared to Loom's standard player.
• The tool lets you create dedicated call-to-action pages to guide what viewers do next. This is a more structured approach than Loom's simple CTA button on the video.
• BombBomb provides team workspaces with specific labels and permissions to organize videos. This offers more control over content management than Loom's general team library.

Where BombBomb Falls Short Compared to Loom

• BombBomb's video editor has fewer options for detailed adjustments. In contrast, Loom provides more in-app tools, like removing filler words, which helps create a more polished recording without needing external software.
• It lacks features for team collaboration directly on the video player. Loom allows users to leave time-stamped comments and emoji reactions, which helps teams discuss specific parts of a recording.
• Some users find the user interface less direct for simple screen recordings. Loom's platform is built specifically for that purpose, which can make the process of creating and sharing a quick video feel faster.

Budget and Cost Considerations

While we've covered key features and use cases in this comparison, pricing models can vary significantly between tools. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting BombBomb's official website.

7) ScreenPal

ScreenPal, formerly Screencast-O-Matic, is a tool for screen recording and video editing. It is used to create instructional videos, tutorials, and presentations. The platform combines capture with editing features to produce content for educational and business purposes.

ScreenPal's Main Features

• Edits video with tools for trimming, overlays, and animations.
• Includes a stock library with videos, images, and music tracks.
• Adds interactive quizzes and polls directly into videos.
• Hosts video content securely in the cloud for management and sharing.

How ScreenPal Compares to Loom

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 81 G2 reviews.

• ScreenPal provides a more comprehensive video editor than Loom. It allows for detailed adjustments, including overlays and animations, which are not native to Loom.
• The platform includes an integrated stock media library. This gives users access to images and videos to enhance their content, a feature Loom does not offer.
• It has a feature for interactive quizzes to engage viewers and assess comprehension. This is a function built for training and education, which is outside of Loom's core use case.
• ScreenPal offers more advanced content hosting options, including channels and password protection. This provides greater control over video organization compared to Loom's simpler library structure.

Where ScreenPal Falls Short Compared to Loom

• ScreenPal does not have collaborative feedback tools like time-stamped comments. This makes Loom a more suitable choice for teams that need to review and discuss videos asynchronously.
• The process to create and share a video can be slower than with Loom. Loom's workflow is optimized for instant cloud uploads and link sharing, while ScreenPal may require more steps.
• Some users may find its interface more complex than Loom's. For users who only need to record and share quick videos, Loom's focused design can feel more direct.

Budget and Cost Considerations

ScreenPal offers annual subscription plans for individuals and teams. This pricing model can be a predictable expense for users who need its advanced editing and hosting features, contrasting with Loom's flexible monthly billing that may suit teams with fluctuating needs.

ScreenPal, formerly Screencast-O-Matic, is a tool to record screens and edit video. People use it to create instructional videos, tutorials, and presentations. The platform combines screen capture with a video editor to produce content for educational and business use.

ScreenPal's Main Features

• Creates storyboards and scripts to plan video content before recording.
• Uses AI to generate speech-to-text captions, content summaries, and translations for over 150 languages.
• Captures full-page scrolling screenshots and uses OCR to recognize and edit text within the images.
• Offers an API and SDK for developers to embed screen recording and hosting features into other applications.

How ScreenPal Compares To Loom

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 120 G2 reviews.

• ScreenPal allows you to add interactive quizzes and polls to videos, offering a way to check viewer understanding that is not available in Loom.
• The tool includes a storyboard feature to plan content before recording, which supports a more structured production process than Loom’s spontaneous recording workflow.
• It provides more advanced editing tools like text animations and overlays, giving users more creative control compared to Loom's basic trimming functions.
• This platform offers an API and SDK for developers to embed video functions into other applications, a feature that Loom does not provide.

Where ScreenPal Falls Short Compared to Loom

• ScreenPal does not have an AI feature to automatically remove filler words. This is different from Loom, which can detect and delete words like "um" and "ah," helping users clean up recordings faster.
• Some users report that the tool can have performance issues or glitches with very long recordings. This might be less of a concern with Loom, as its video processing is handled in the cloud.
• It offers limited options for customizing the video player with company branding. In comparison, Loom provides more advanced branding controls on its Business plan, which helps maintain a consistent brand image.

Budget and Cost Considerations

ScreenPal offers paid plans starting at $4 per user per month, with a team plan available for $8 per user. This pricing is generally lower than Loom's business tier, making it a budget-friendly choice for users who need advanced editing features without a higher per-seat cost.

8) Bubbles

Bubbles is a collaborative platform for screen capture and asynchronous feedback. Teams use it to record their screen and add time-stamped comments directly on the video. This process clarifies feedback and helps resolve issues without live meetings. The tool supports team alignment and project reviews.

Bubbles's Main Features

• Provides a Chrome extension to annotate any website for team feedback.
• Includes an AI meeting notetaker that creates accurate summaries.
• Supports multiple languages, including German, French, Japanese, Dutch, and Spanish.

How Bubbles Compares to Loom

Average Review score: 4.1/5 stars based on 7 G2 reviews.

• Bubbles provides a Chrome extension to annotate directly on any website for team feedback. This is different from Loom, which is built for video capture instead of static page markups.
• The platform includes an AI meeting notetaker that generates summaries. In comparison, Loom is used to create video messages and does not have a feature to automatically document meetings.
• It supports multiple languages, including German, French, and Spanish, which is useful for international teams. This provides broader language options compared to Loom.
• The tool allows teams to give feedback by adding comments directly on a website. This offers a different collaborative workflow than Loom’s time-stamped comments on a video.

Where Bubbles Falls Short Compared to Loom

• Bubbles does not have dedicated mobile or desktop applications. This is different from Loom, which provides apps for various platforms so users can record and share videos from any device.
• The tool's free version includes a link-expiry timer. This can be a drawback for users who need permanent access to shared content, a feature that is less restrictive in Loom's free plan.
• Some users report that the platform can be slow to load. This might affect workflow efficiency compared to Loom, whose cloud service is generally optimized for speed.

Budget and Cost Considerations

While we've covered key features and use cases in this comparison, pricing models can vary significantly between tools. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Bubbles's official website.

9) Hippo Video

Hippo Video is a video platform for sales and marketing teams. It allows users to record and distribute personalized video content. The tool is used for sales outreach, client communication, and marketing campaigns to connect with audiences and explain complex topics without long text blocks.

Hippo Video's Main Features

• Generates videos from text and offers interactive human avatars.
• Adds interactive elements like forms, polls, and surveys directly into videos.
• Repurposes existing content such as blogs and documents into video formats.
• Provides sales coaching features and performance insights for teams.

How Hippo Video Compares To Loom

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 734 G2 reviews.

• Hippo Video adds interactive elements like polls and forms directly into videos. This provides more ways to engage viewers compared to Loom's single call-to-action button.
• It generates videos from text and uses interactive human avatars. This differs from Loom, which requires manual screen and webcam recordings for all content.
• The tool repurposes existing content, such as blog posts, into new videos. This automates content creation, while Loom requires a new recording for each video.
• This platform includes sales coaching features with performance insights for teams. Loom can be used for feedback but does not offer specialized tools for sales training.

Where Hippo Video Falls Short Compared to Loom

• Some users report that the user interface can feel slow or clunky. This is different from Loom, which is generally known for a fast and simple workflow designed for quick, straightforward recordings.
• The platform's editing tools can feel complex for basic adjustments. It does not offer an AI feature to automatically remove filler words, a tool Loom provides to help clean up recordings quickly.
• It has a steeper learning curve due to its wide range of features. Users who only need to create simple video messages may find Loom's more focused platform easier to learn and use without extensive training.

Budget and Cost Considerations

Hippo Video’s paid plans start at $20 per user for the Pro tier, with its Teams plan at $60 and Enterprise at $80. This pricing is higher than Loom's general business plans, reflecting Hippo Video's focus on specialized sales features like interactive video elements and AI content generation.

10) Descript

Descript offers a way to edit video and audio through a text document. The software transcribes your file, so any change to the text alters the media. Teams use it for screen recordings, business videos, and podcasts. The workflow resembles a word processor, not a video timeline.

Descript's Main Features

• Edits video and audio files by modifying the automatically generated text transcript.
• Transcribes content with automatic speaker detection to label who is talking.
• Removes filler words and silence gaps from the recording with a single click.

How Descript Compares to Loom

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 779 G2 reviews.

• Descript allows you to edit video by changing the text transcript, which is a different workflow than Loom's timeline-based editor.
• The tool removes filler words and silence gaps with one click from the text. While Loom has a similar feature, Descript integrates it directly into the text-editing process.
• It automatically transcribes audio and detects who is speaking. This provides more detail for multi-person recordings compared to Loom's standard transcription feature.
• This platform supports multi-track editing for separate audio and video files. This offers more control for complex projects than Loom's simpler recording setup.

Where Descript Falls Short Compared To Loom

• Descript has a steeper learning curve because of its advanced editing features. In comparison, Loom's interface is designed for simple video messages, so it is often easier for new users to adopt.
• Some users report that the application can be slow with large or complex projects. This is different from Loom, which processes video in the cloud and places less demand on a user's computer.
• The platform does not offer instant cloud sharing in the same way as Loom. Users may need to render and publish a video before they can share it, while Loom provides a shareable link immediately after a recording.

Budget and Cost Considerations

Descript offers monthly plans, including a Creator tier at $24 per user and a Business plan at $40 per user. This tiered structure can be more cost-effective for users who need more than a free plan but not a full business package, compared to Loom's simpler pricing model.

Which One Should You Go With?

Choosing the right Loom alternative depends on your specific needs, from sales automation to advanced video editing. This guide reviewed several options to help you identify the best fit for your team's workflow and budget.

If your goal is sales automation, consider 11x. Our platform uses AI agents to manage outreach and qualify leads, allowing your sales team to focus on closing deals. We combine multiple sales functions into a single platform.