ProspectIn Alternatives

ProspectIn is a popular tool for automating LinkedIn outreach, and for good reason. It excels at saving time and simplifying prospecting campaigns, making it a solid choice for users who need to manage connections without deep technical knowledge.

But no tool is perfect. Some users mention occasional technical issues, missing features, or find it expensive. We've analyzed the top alternatives based on G2 reviews, comparing them to ProspectIn to help you find the right fit. Let's get started.

Consider 11x for Sales Automation

If your sales strategy involves using digital workers, 11x offers a platform to build and deploy them. This approach can help manage sales tasks and workflows and is a relevant option for teams that want automation beyond simple outreach.

11x is an all-in-one GTM platform where our AI agents manage the sales process. Alice finds prospects, runs outreach on email and LinkedIn, and maintains the CRM. Julian qualifies inbound leads and schedules meetings.

The platform unifies these functions and removes the need for separate tools for data enrichment, outreach, or email warmup.

ProspectIn Alternatives

The following sections provide a detailed breakdown of each ProspectIn alternative. We analyze pricing, core features, and the main advantages and drawbacks to help you choose the best option.

1) Phantombuster

Phantombuster provides tools to extract data and automate actions on websites and social media. It uses pre-built automations, known as Phantoms, to perform tasks for sales and marketing teams. For LinkedIn outreach, the platform can scrape profiles and send connection requests.

These automations help teams collect leads and manage outreach campaigns without manual data work. The tool's approach centers on single-action automation.

Phantombuster's Main Features

• Utilizes pre-built automations, known as Phantoms, to perform specific tasks across different web platforms.
• Extracts data from websites and social media, enabling teams to scrape profiles and other public information.
• Automates social media actions, such as sending connection requests on LinkedIn to support outreach campaigns.
• Operates on a single-action automation model, where each automation is designed to complete one distinct job.

How Phantombuster Differs From ProspectIn

Average Review score: 4.3/5 stars based on 97 G2 reviews.

• Phantombuster extracts data from many websites, including Twitter and Google Maps, while ProspectIn works almost entirely within LinkedIn.
• It lets users build advanced automation workflows, which provides more flexibility compared to the structured campaign approach of ProspectIn.
• The platform's focus is on data extraction from various online sources, a different approach from ProspectIn, which centers on LinkedIn outreach automation.
• Its automations are single-action "Phantoms" that can be combined, and this modular setup gives users more specific control than ProspectIn's integrated sequences.

Where Phantombuster Falls Short

• Phantombuster requires more technical skill to build advanced workflows. Compared to ProspectIn, its setup can be complex for users who prefer a guided campaign creation process.
• Its automations sometimes stop working when external websites change their structure. This differs from ProspectIn, which may offer more consistent performance due to its singular focus on the LinkedIn platform.
• Some users find that customer support response times can be slow. This may be a drawback for teams that need immediate help with their automation setups.

Pricing and Plan Breakdown

ProspectIn offers a free plan and paid tiers starting at $21 per month, making it an accessible option. Phantombuster does not list specific prices and is generally considered a higher investment, which can be a factor for smaller operations. For the most accurate pricing, we recommend visiting the official Phantombuster website.

2) Dux-Soup

Dux-Soup is a LinkedIn automation platform that operates as a browser extension and a cloud service. It automates prospecting, outreach, and follow-up to help sales teams, agencies, and business owners find leads. The tool works inside LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, or Recruiter to manage campaigns.

Users can choose between a browser-based version for on-device automation or a cloud edition for continuous operation from any location.

Dux-Soup's Main Features

• Works directly inside LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, or Recruiter, using advanced filters for audience targeting.
• Automates outreach with connection invites, InMails, and personalized drip campaigns that have custom time delays.
• Allows campaigns to be shared across multiple teammates or run for several client accounts.
• Pushes new leads to CRMs like Salesforce and HubSpot through native integrations, Zapier, or Make.

How Dux-Soup Compares to ProspectIn

Average Review score: 4.3/5 stars based on 82 G2 reviews.

• Dux-Soup offers both browser-based and cloud automation. This provides more flexibility than ProspectIn, which is primarily a browser extension, and allows campaigns to run continuously without an active computer.
• It integrates directly with CRMs like Salesforce and HubSpot. This lets users run campaigns on contacts from their CRM, offering a different level of integration than ProspectIn's LinkedIn-focused system.
• The platform includes features for agencies and teams, such as sharing campaigns across multiple user accounts. This provides a collaborative function that is less central to ProspectIn's design.
• Users have more granular control to build outreach sequences with actions like profile visits and endorsements. This approach is more modular than the predefined campaign structures found in ProspectIn.

Where Dux-Soup Falls Short Compared to ProspectIn

• Dux-Soup's interface can feel less intuitive for some users. In comparison, ProspectIn offers a more guided experience, which simplifies campaign creation for non-technical teams.
• It can be difficult to edit messages in an active campaign. ProspectIn's integrated sequences, on the other hand, may offer a more straightforward process for managing and modifying campaign steps.
• The tool's cloud version has certain limitations, as some users note team campaigns are not available. This contrasts with ProspectIn's browser-based model, where features are consistent.

Pricing and Plan Breakdown

Dux-Soup offers a more affordable entry point with its Pro plan at $11.25 per month, compared to ProspectIn's Pro plan at $21. However, ProspectIn's top-tier Business plan at $66 is more cost-effective than Dux-Soup's $74.17 Cloud plan. For the most accurate pricing, visit the Dux-Soup 's official website.

3) Octopus CRM

Octopus CRM is a LinkedIn automation tool and mini-CRM that works as a Chrome extension. It is for prospect and lead work on LinkedIn. Users build outreach funnels to automate connections, send follow-up messages, and endorse skills.

The tool includes safety controls to operate within LinkedIn limits. It is used for mass outreach, recruitment, and to manage multiple client accounts. The platform also tracks analytics and syncs data to other tools.

Octopus CRM's Main Features

• Sends automated connection requests and can bypass LinkedIn's weekly invite limit by sending them via email.
• Builds multi-step outreach funnels with a drag-and-drop campaign builder to connect different actions.
• Automatically visits profiles and endorses up to seven skills for each contact.
• Pushes data to other applications like HubSpot and Google Sheets through Zapier integration.

How Octopus CRM Compares to ProspectIn

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 116 G2 reviews.

• Octopus CRM provides a visual funnel builder to create multi-step campaigns, which offers more flexibility than the structured campaign sequences in ProspectIn.
• The tool sends connection requests via email to help bypass LinkedIn's weekly invite limit, a feature not available in ProspectIn's standard outreach process.
• Its pricing starts at $6.99 per month, which makes it a more budget-friendly option compared to ProspectIn's higher-priced entry plan.
• The platform automates skill endorsements for contacts, a specific engagement feature that ProspectIn's automation does not focus on.

Where Octopus CRM Falls Short Compared to ProspectIn

• Octopus CRM's user interface is split between a web app and a browser extension, which can feel less cohesive than ProspectIn's single, integrated platform.
• Some users find its reporting features are less comprehensive, unlike ProspectIn, where analytics are a core part of its campaign management system.
• Advanced automation sometimes requires add-ons, while ProspectIn includes integrated, multi-step sequences as a standard feature in its campaign builder.

Pricing and Plan Breakdown

Octopus CRM is the more budget-friendly option, with plans starting at $6.99 per month, significantly lower than ProspectIn's $21 entry point. While ProspectIn's higher-priced plans may cater to larger teams, Octopus provides a more cost-effective solution across comparable tiers. Check the detailed pricing of Octopus CRM on Octopus CRM 's official website.

4) Expandi

Expandi is a cloud-based platform for LinkedIn automation. It helps sales teams, agencies, and recruiters run outreach campaigns for lead generation. The tool uses automated sequences to connect with prospects and manage follow-ups. It operates entirely in the cloud, which allows campaigns to run continuously without a computer on.

Expandi's Main Features

• Builds smart campaigns using a visual drag-and-drop flow with 10 actions and 10 conditions, including pre-outreach warm-up actions.
• Combines LinkedIn and email outreach into multi-touch sequences from a single platform.
• Inserts dynamic images, videos, and GIFs into messages through direct integrations with Sendspark and Hyperize as a paid add-on.
• Manages multiple LinkedIn accounts from one login with shared dashboards, roles, and permission controls for teams and agencies.

How Expandi Compares to ProspectIn

Average Review score: 4.2/5 stars based on 113 G2 reviews.

• Expandi supports both LinkedIn and email outreach in the same campaign. This is different from ProspectIn, which centers its automation on the LinkedIn platform.
• The tool runs campaigns from the cloud, so they work 24/7. This differs from ProspectIn's browser-based model, which needs an active computer to run automations.
• Its smart campaigns can include actions like endorsing a lead's skills or following their company page. This provides more warm-up options than ProspectIn's predefined steps.
• The platform allows users to send personalized images and GIFs in messages through integrations, a different type of personalization compared to ProspectIn's text-based automation.

Where Expandi Falls Short Compared to ProspectIn

• Expandi's advanced campaign builder can have a steeper learning curve. In comparison, ProspectIn offers a more guided and structured process for creating campaigns, which some users find simpler to start with.
• The tool's starting price is higher than ProspectIn's entry-level plan. This makes ProspectIn a more accessible option for individuals or small teams with a tighter budget.
• Some users report occasional campaign delays or technical issues. ProspectIn's design as a browser extension focused only on LinkedIn may offer more consistent performance for its core outreach functions.

Pricing and Plan Breakdown

ProspectIn offers a more accessible entry point with plans starting at $21 per month, while Expandi is a higher-priced option. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Expandi's official website.

5) Linked Helper

Linked Helper is a LinkedIn automation tool that functions as a standalone application. It helps sales and marketing teams with outreach and lead generation on the platform. The software automates actions to connect with prospects, expand a professional network, and support business development efforts directly within the LinkedIn environment.

Linked Helper's Main Features

• Includes a built-in CRM that stores a full interaction history, tags, and notes for every processed contact.
• Provides an email finder to uncover email addresses for 2nd and 3rd-degree connections, with credits included in plans.
• Offers a drag-and-drop funnel builder to create workflows combining actions like profile visits, follows, and messages.
• Scrapes and exports profile, company, and contact data to a CSV file or pushes it to third-party applications.

How Linked Helper Compares To ProspectIn

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 144 G2 reviews.

• Linked Helper operates as a standalone application that mimics human actions. This is different from ProspectIn's browser extension model and offers another approach to account safety.
• It includes a built-in CRM that stores a full interaction history for each contact. This provides more detailed contact management inside the tool than ProspectIn's campaign-focused system.
• The tool offers direct integrations with CRMs like Hubspot and Pipedrive. This creates a deeper connection with sales workflows compared to ProspectIn's more self-contained platform.
• Its message editor supports custom variables and conditional logic. This gives users more advanced options for message personalization than the standard templates in ProspectIn.

Where Linked Helper Falls Short Compared to ProspectIn

• Linked Helper operates as a standalone application, which some users find more complex to learn. In comparison, ProspectIn's browser extension model may offer a more direct setup for users who are not as technical.
• Its user interface can feel less intuitive for some users. ProspectIn provides a more guided experience within a single platform, which can simplify campaign creation for teams that prefer a clear workflow.
• The tool runs locally on your computer, which can use significant system resources. This is different from ProspectIn's browser-based approach, which some users might find lighter on their computer's performance during daily tasks.

Pricing and Plan Breakdown

Linked Helper offers a more affordable entry point with its Standard plan at $15 per month, compared to ProspectIn's Pro plan at $21. Its PRO plan at $45 is priced similarly to ProspectIn's $44 Advanced plan. While ProspectIn has a free tier, Linked Helper provides a lower-cost entry for paid features.

Try 11x for Sales Automation

For teams interested in a different approach to sales automation, 11x offers a platform for digital workers. These AI agents manage lead generation, initial contact, and qualification, unifying multiple sales functions into one system.

If you want to explore how AI agents can handle your sales process and remove the need for separate tools, you can review the 11x platform.

At 11x, we use AI to manage your sales process. Our agent Alice finds prospects and runs outreach, while Julian qualifies leads and books meetings. The platform unifies these functions, replacing separate tools for data enrichment, outreach, and email warmup.

Book a demo to see the platform in action.

6) Zopto

Zopto is a cloud-based platform for LinkedIn automation. It helps sales teams and recruiters with lead generation through automated profile views, connection requests, and messages. The tool uses filters to target prospects by industry, location, or title and allows A/B tests for messages.

It also supports the management of multiple accounts from one dashboard, a feature for agencies. The platform provides campaign analytics and connects to other tools via webhooks.

Zopto's Main Features

• Builds end-to-end campaigns, writes templates, and auto-responds in the inbox with a GPT-4 AI assistant.
• Combines LinkedIn actions with up to 5,000 verified email sends per month in omnichannel smart sequences.
• Targets prospects with advanced filters and uses AI to scrub lists for accuracy.
• Schedules LinkedIn posts and generates content with a ChatGPT-4 tool.

How Zopto Compares to ProspectIn

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 71 G2 reviews.

• Zopto provides a GPT-4 AI assistant for template creation and automated inbox replies. This offers advanced content support compared to the standard templates available in ProspectIn.
• The tool combines LinkedIn actions with email outreach in the same sequence. This creates an omnichannel campaign, whereas ProspectIn's automation centers almost exclusively on LinkedIn.
• It allows users to schedule LinkedIn posts and generate post content with a ChatGPT-4 tool. This adds a content marketing function not found in ProspectIn's outreach-focused platform.
• Zopto uses AI to clean prospect lists for improved accuracy before outreach. This data preparation step is a different focus from ProspectIn, which centers on the campaign automation process itself.

Where Zopto Falls Short Compared to ProspectIn

• Some users mention that Zopto can feel slow or experience technical issues. ProspectIn, as a browser extension, may offer a more direct and responsive user experience for its core functions.
• Its platform includes many advanced features like an AI assistant, which can make it more complex to learn. In comparison, ProspectIn provides a more guided process that some users find easier to start with.
• The tool's reporting features sometimes present issues with data accuracy, according to some users. ProspectIn integrates analytics as a central part of its system, which may offer more consistent performance tracking.

Pricing and Plan Breakdown

Zopto is positioned as a premium tool and is generally more expensive than ProspectIn, which offers paid tiers starting at $21 per month. For the most accurate pricing, we recommend visiting the official Zopto website.

7) We-Connect

We-Connect is a cloud-based LinkedIn automation platform. It helps sales teams, marketers, and recruiters find and nurture leads. The tool automates profile views, connection requests, and message sequences to support prospect work.

Because it operates in the cloud, campaigns can run continuously without an active computer. This approach supports consistent outreach to generate leads.

We-Connect's Main Features

• Combines LinkedIn and email outreach into a single multi-channel campaign.
• Uses an AI assistant to generate personalized connection requests and message replies.
• Includes a Post Remix feature to plan, schedule, and repurpose trending LinkedIn content.
• Provides an automatic account warm-up function to safely increase daily and weekly message limits.

How We-Connect Compares To ProspectIn

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 83 G2 reviews.

• We-Connect combines LinkedIn and email outreach into a single campaign. This differs from ProspectIn, which focuses its automation almost entirely on the LinkedIn platform.
• It uses an AI assistant to help write personalized connection requests and replies. This offers a different level of content support compared to ProspectIn's standard template system.
• The platform includes a Post Remix feature to plan and schedule LinkedIn content, a function not found in ProspectIn's outreach-focused tool.
• An automatic account warm-up function helps to safely increase daily activity. This offers a specific safety approach compared to ProspectIn's standard campaign execution.

Where We-Connect Falls Short Compared to ProspectIn

• Some users report occasional delays or slow performance with the platform. ProspectIn, as a browser extension, may feel more responsive since it operates directly inside the browser.
• The tool's analytics are sometimes less detailed than what ProspectIn provides. ProspectIn integrates reporting as a core part of its system, which can give users a clearer view of campaign performance.
• Its user interface can feel less intuitive for new users. In comparison, ProspectIn offers a more guided experience that simplifies the process of creating and launching outreach campaigns.

Pricing and Plan Breakdown

We-Connect is a higher-priced option, with plans starting at $69 per month, whereas ProspectIn's paid plans begin at $21. ProspectIn remains more cost-effective at the top end; its $66 Business plan is priced lower than We-Connect's $79 Professional plan.

8) Meet Alfred

Meet Alfred is a platform for LinkedIn automation that helps sales teams and agencies with lead generation. It uses automated outreach campaigns to connect with prospects and manage sales workflows.

The tool builds multi-step sequences with actions like connection requests and follow-up messages. This approach supports the sales process from initial contact to continued engagement on the LinkedIn platform.

Meet Alfred's Main Features

• Manages multi-channel outreach campaigns across LinkedIn, email, and Twitter from a single platform.
• Automates sequences with actions like profile visits, connection requests, and follow-up messages.
• Sends automated congratulatory messages for contacts' birthdays and job changes.
• Integrates with CRM and marketing automation systems to connect with existing sales workflows.

How Meet Alfred Compares To ProspectIn

Average Review score: 3.3/5 stars based on 32 G2 reviews.

• Meet Alfred manages outreach on LinkedIn, email, and Twitter. This provides a multi-channel approach, while ProspectIn focuses its automation almost entirely on LinkedIn.
• The tool sends automated messages for events like birthdays or job changes. This offers a different type of engagement compared to ProspectIn's standard campaign sequences.
• It integrates with CRM and marketing automation systems. This allows for a connection to existing sales workflows, which is different from ProspectIn's more self-contained platform.
• The platform combines actions across different platforms into a single campaign. This is a broader scope than ProspectIn, which builds campaigns within the LinkedIn environment.

Where Meet Alfred Falls Short Compared to ProspectIn

• Some users report issues with LinkedIn detection, which can be a concern for account safety. ProspectIn's browser extension model offers a different approach to platform interaction that some may find more direct.
• The platform sometimes has limited campaign quotas on its lower-tier plans. In comparison, ProspectIn's structure may provide a more straightforward experience for users who need to run multiple campaigns without such restrictions.
• Its multi-channel approach can make the user interface feel complex for some users. ProspectIn, with its focus only on LinkedIn, offers a more guided experience that can be simpler to navigate.

Pricing and Plan Breakdown

ProspectIn offers paid plans starting at $21 per month. While Meet Alfred does not list its prices, it is generally considered a cost-effective option. For the most accurate pricing, we recommend visiting the Meet Alfred official website.

9) Lemlist

Lemlist is a sales engagement platform that focuses on personalized cold email outreach. It allows users to create multi-channel sequences combining email and LinkedIn actions. The tool is built to improve email deliverability and response rates through advanced personalization features.

Lemlist's Main Features

• Builds multi-channel sequences that combine email, LinkedIn actions, and cold calls.
• Offers advanced email personalization with custom text, images, and videos.
• Includes an email warm-up tool to improve sender reputation and deliverability.
• Provides A/B testing to optimize different parts of an email campaign for better results.

How Lemlist Compares To ProspectIn

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 400+ G2 reviews.

• Lemlist is primarily an email outreach tool with added LinkedIn functions, while ProspectIn is a dedicated LinkedIn automation platform.
• It offers advanced personalization, such as dynamic images in emails, a feature not available in ProspectIn.
• The platform includes built-in email warm-up tools to improve deliverability, which is outside the scope of ProspectIn's features.
• Lemlist operates as a cloud-based platform, whereas ProspectIn functions as a browser extension.

Where Lemlist Falls Short Compared to ProspectIn

• Lemlist's LinkedIn automation capabilities are less comprehensive. ProspectIn provides more depth for users who concentrate solely on LinkedIn outreach.
• The user interface can feel more complex due to its multi-channel features. ProspectIn's singular focus may offer a more direct user experience.
• It is generally a higher-priced option, which can make ProspectIn more cost-effective for teams that only need LinkedIn automation.

Pricing and Plan Breakdown

Lemlist's plans start at a higher price point than ProspectIn's, which reflects its focus on email outreach and multi-channel features. For users who only need LinkedIn automation, ProspectIn offers a more accessible entry price.

Lemlist is a sales engagement platform for personalized cold email outreach. It creates multi-channel sequences with email and LinkedIn actions. The tool aims to improve email deliverability and response rates through its personalization options, making it a choice for teams that use both channels.

Lemlist's Main Features

• Builds multi-channel sequences that combine email, LinkedIn actions, and cold calls.
• Offers advanced email personalization with custom text, images, and videos.
• Includes an email warm-up tool to improve sender reputation and deliverability.
• Provides A/B testing to optimize different parts of an email campaign for better results.

How Lemlist Compares To ProspectIn

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 276 G2 reviews.

• Lemlist builds multi-channel sequences that combine email, LinkedIn actions, and cold calls, while ProspectIn focuses its automation on the LinkedIn platform.
• It offers advanced email personalization with custom text and images, a feature not available in ProspectIn’s standard message templates.
• The platform includes an email warm-up tool to improve sender reputation, a function that is outside the scope of ProspectIn's LinkedIn-centric features.
• Users can add phone calls directly into their outreach sequences, which provides another contact method compared to ProspectIn's platform.

Where Lemlist Falls Short Compared To ProspectIn

• Lemlist adds LinkedIn automation to its core email features. ProspectIn is a dedicated LinkedIn tool, which may offer a more stable experience for users who only need outreach on that single platform.
• Its interface manages multiple channels, which some users find less direct than ProspectIn's. For teams focused only on LinkedIn, ProspectIn's single-platform design can be simpler to navigate.
• The platform's pricing reflects its multi-channel features. For teams that only need LinkedIn automation, ProspectIn's lower entry price can be a more cost-effective choice.

Pricing and Plan Breakdown

Lemlist's Email Pro plan is priced at $55 per year, offering a lower entry point than ProspectIn's Pro plan at $21 per month. However, its Multichannel Expert plan at $79 per month is more expensive than ProspectIn's top Business plan at $66 per month, reflecting its broader feature set.

10) Salesflow

Salesflow is a cloud-based platform for LinkedIn automation. It assists sales teams and agencies with lead generation through automated outreach campaigns. The tool manages multi-step sequences that include connection requests and messages to engage prospects on LinkedIn.

Salesflow's Main Features

• Monitors leads and captures data from social media and websites.
• Provides performance analytics and reporting with data export and import functions.
• Allows for campaign personalization using custom forms and templates.
• Includes lead identification and mobile access for campaign management.

How Salesflow Compares To ProspectIn

Average Review score: 4.3/5 stars based on 132 G2 reviews.

• Salesflow monitors leads and captures data from websites and social media, while ProspectIn's automation works almost entirely within LinkedIn.
• It provides mobile access for campaign management, which offers more flexibility than ProspectIn's system that requires a desktop browser.
• The tool allows for campaign personalization with custom forms. This provides another method for gathering lead data compared to ProspectIn's standard templates.
• Its reporting includes data export and import functions, giving teams more options for external analysis compared to ProspectIn's integrated analytics.

Where Salesflow Falls Short Compared To ProspectIn

• Some users report that Salesflow can have technical issues, which may affect its reliability for daily tasks. ProspectIn, in contrast, offers a more focused feature set that generally provides a stable experience for its core outreach functions.
• The platform sometimes has issues with the accuracy of its lead data. This is different from ProspectIn, which pulls information directly from LinkedIn profiles, a method that often results in more dependable contact details.
• It does not offer a free plan, which makes it difficult to test before a purchase. ProspectIn provides a free version, so teams can evaluate its main functions without an initial investment.

Pricing and Plan Breakdown

ProspectIn offers paid plans starting at $21 per month, making it an accessible option. Salesflow does not list its prices publicly, but it is positioned as a premium tool. For the most accurate pricing, we recommend visiting the official Salesflow website.

Which One Should You Go With?

Choosing the right ProspectIn alternative depends on your specific needs, budget, and technical resources. This guide reviewed several options, comparing their features and pricing to help you make an informed decision.

If you want to move beyond single-tool automation, 11x offers a different approach. Our platform uses AI agents to manage the entire sales process, from prospecting and outreach to lead qualification, unifying your GTM stack into a single system.