Sendspark Alternatives

You might be using Sendspark for its strong video features. It's great for screen recording and creating personalized videos at scale. The tool makes it simple to record yourself or your screen, helping you connect with customers through video emails and messages.

But like any tool, it has some drawbacks. Some users report issues with background removal or slow video loading times. For these reasons, we've analyzed the top alternatives to help you find a better fit. Let's get started.

Try 11x for Digital Sales Workers

If your sales process could benefit from automation, consider using digital workers. 11x offers autonomous agents that can handle parts of your sales outreach, a different approach to connect with potential customers.

These agents can perform tasks like lead research and personalized communication. For teams that want to scale efforts without expanding headcount, this type of tool offers a distinct path forward. Now, let's look at direct video messaging alternatives.

At 11x, we provide a GTM platform where AI agents autonomously manage sales operations. Our agent, Alice, finds high-intent prospects, performs outreach on email and LinkedIn, and maintains your CRM. Julian qualifies inbound leads and schedules meetings.

We unify functions like data enrichment, outreach, and email warmup. This approach removes the need for separate point solutions in your GTM stack.

Sendspark Alternatives

Here is a detailed breakdown of several Sendspark alternatives. We will analyze each tool's pricing, main features, and how it compares to Sendspark, covering both its advantages and potential drawbacks.

1) Vidyard

Vidyard is a video platform for businesses, offering more than just video messaging. It provides robust hosting, detailed analytics, and strong integration capabilities. This makes it a comprehensive tool for sales and marketing teams that use video across the entire customer journey.

Its main advantage is its analytics. You can track individual viewer engagement and see how videos impact your sales pipeline. For teams that need to measure video ROI and integrate with CRMs like Salesforce, Vidyard offers deeper insights than Sendspark.

The platform's extensive features can come with a higher price tag. Some teams might also find its interface more complex compared to Sendspark's straightforward design. This is a consideration for those who only need basic recording and sending functions.

Choose Vidyard if your organization requires deep video analytics and seamless CRM integration. It is best for established sales teams that want to track video performance data. For simpler video outreach without the need for advanced metrics, other options may be more suitable.

Vidyard is a video platform for sales teams to create and send personalized videos at scale. It helps with outreach to prospects and supports sales work. The platform allows users to record their screen, deliver video messages, and track performance.

A free screen recorder is available as a Chrome extension. This tool is for teams that want to improve outreach and shorten deal cycles through video communication.

Vidyard's Main Features

• Automates repetitive sales workflows and sends personalized videos using an AI-powered video agent.
• Provides a central library to host, organize, and track video assets with real-time engagement analytics and triggers.
• Offers native integrations with CRMs and sales-engagement tools, including Salesforce, HubSpot, and Salesloft.
• Includes add-on products like AI avatars and an AI script generator for creating videos at scale.

How Vidyard Compares to Sendspark

Average Review Score: 4.5/5 stars based on 808 G2 reviews.

• Vidyard provides deeper video analytics compared to Sendspark. The platform tracks individual viewer engagement and shows how videos influence the sales pipeline, which allows for more detailed ROI measurement.
• The tool offers more extensive CRM integrations. Its native connection with Salesforce, for instance, allows for a deeper data sync compared to Sendspark's integration capabilities.
• An AI-powered video agent automates personalized video creation and delivery. This feature handles repetitive outreach tasks, a different approach from Sendspark's focus on manual personalization.
• The platform includes a central video library for hosting and management. This feature lets teams organize all video assets in one place, which provides more structure than Sendspark's video storage.

Vidyard's Limitations Compared to Sendspark

• Vidyard offers many features, which sometimes makes its interface feel more complex than Sendspark's straightforward design.
• Its in-app editing capabilities are more limited. Some users note the absence of features like background removal, a drawback for those who need more customization compared to Sendspark.
• The platform's pricing can be a consideration for smaller teams. Its cost is higher due to advanced features that may not be necessary for users who need simpler functions like those in Sendspark.

Pricing and Budget Considerations

Vidyard’s starter plan costs $59 per user per month. While specific pricing for Sendspark is not listed, reviews describe it as having accessible pricing, making it a suitable option for teams that need core video features without the higher cost associated with Vidyard's advanced analytics.

2) Loom

Loom is an AI-powered video messaging platform to record your screen, camera, or both. You can share the videos instantly across different applications. The platform emphasizes fast recording and collaboration tools to boost productivity for teammates and customers.

Sales teams use it to personalize outreach pitches, while support teams troubleshoot issues with video. An enterprise edition provides secure, large-scale administration for organizations.

Loom's Main Features

• The platform offers Loom AI, which provides automatic video enhancement and converts scripts into documents or messages.
• An intuitive video editor allows users to trim, stitch clips, and add custom backgrounds, text, or overlays.
• It includes viewer engagement tools such as comments, calls-to-action, and automatically generated captions in over 50 languages.
• The tool provides enterprise-grade security with features like SSO, SCIM, and custom data-retention policies for granular privacy control.

How Loom Compares to Sendspark

Average Review Score: 4.7/5 stars based on 2,119 G2 reviews.

• Loom's AI automatically generates video summaries, chapters, and tasks. This adds a layer of automation after the recording is complete, a different approach from Sendspark's focus on video creation and delivery.
• The tool offers more advanced in-app editing options, with the ability to stitch clips and add overlays. This gives users more creative control compared to the basic edit functions in Sendspark.
• It provides automatic transcriptions and closed captions in over 50 languages. This feature makes videos more accessible than those made with Sendspark, which does not have this range of language support.
• For larger organizations, the platform provides enterprise-grade security features like SSO and custom data retention. This offers a higher level of administrative control than Sendspark's security options.

Loom's Limitations Compared to Sendspark

• Loom's platform supports general team collaboration. This can make its interface feel less direct for specific sales outreach tasks when you compare it to Sendspark's focused design.
• Some users report occasional issues with the record function. This may interrupt a user's workflow, a potential drawback for teams that need consistent performance for outreach.
• The tool does not have some of Sendspark's features for large-scale personalized video campaigns. For instance, it lacks options for dynamic content within videos for sales automation.

Pricing and Budget Considerations

Loom’s Business plan is priced at $15 per user per month. While Sendspark does not list specific prices, it is often cited for its accessible pricing, making it a strong contender for teams with tighter budgets. For the most current details, you can visit Loom's official website.

3) BombBomb

BombBomb is a video-messaging platform that lets users record, send, and track personal videos, most often inside email. The tool creates face-to-face communication at scale for revenue-generating and customer-facing teams.

Sales teams use it to shorten sales cycles and boost response rates. Marketing departments use it to humanize the brand and drive more conversions, while support teams can reduce ticket touches.

BombBomb's Main Features

• The platform provides content management to organize videos with labels, permissions, and team workspaces.
• A single dashboard offers analytics on views, engagement, and overall team performance.
• It includes automated outreach campaigns with smart assignment and fallback logic through its Copilot feature.
• The tool offers enterprise-grade security, including SOC 2 Type II compliance, SSO, and role-based access control.

How BombBomb Compares to Sendspark

Average Review Score: 4.7/5 stars based on 583 G2 reviews.

• BombBomb offers automated outreach campaigns with its Copilot feature, which uses smart assignment logic. This provides a different level of automation compared to Sendspark's focus on manual video creation.
• The tool provides a single dashboard for tracking views, engagement, and overall team performance. This offers a more centralized analytics view than Sendspark, which focuses more on individual video metrics.
• It includes content management features like labels and team workspaces to organize videos. This allows for more structured asset management for teams compared to Sendspark's simpler video storage system.
• The platform has a dedicated mobile application for recording and sending videos on the go. This offers more flexibility for remote teams than Sendspark, which is primarily used through its browser extension.
• BombBomb provides enterprise-level security features such as SOC 2 Type II compliance and SSO. This gives a higher degree of administrative control, a different focus from Sendspark's standard security measures.

BombBomb's Limitations Compared to Sendspark

• BombBomb offers basic video editing tools. This is different from Sendspark, which provides more direct options for in-app customization before sharing.
• The tool does not include some of Sendspark's features for personalizing videos at scale, such as adding dynamic content for automated sales campaigns.
• Some users report that its email delivery can occasionally have issues. This is a point of difference from Sendspark, which focuses on smooth delivery for video emails and messages.
• Its pricing plans can be a consideration for smaller teams. In comparison, Sendspark is often noted for more accessible pricing, which may suit users with a tighter budget.

Pricing and Budget Considerations

BombBomb is often perceived as the more expensive option, while Sendspark is noted for accessible pricing. Since pricing models can vary, for the most accurate information, we recommend visiting BombBomb's official website.

4) Hippo Video

Hippo Video is a video platform for business use. It allows teams to create and share personalized videos at scale across the customer journey. The tool supports screen and video capture for sales, marketing, and support functions.

Users can add interactive calls-to-action inside the videos. The platform also provides reports on viewer engagement and video performance. It is for teams that use video for outreach and customer communication.

Hippo Video's Main Features

• Converts text, PPTs, or PDFs into videos with AI avatars and scripts using an agentic AI creation agent.
• Creates a personal AI avatar, or "Digital Twin," that mirrors a user's voice and style for use in demos and support.
• Provides an always-on, real-time video chatbot to act as a video assistant for answering FAQs.
• Offers an SDK, API, and widgets to embed video creation, editing, and playback into other products.

How Hippo Video Compares to Sendspark

Average Review Score: 4.5/5 stars based on 734 G2 reviews.

• Hippo Video offers AI avatars that convert text into video, an automated approach different from Sendspark's focus on manual recording.
• The tool allows users to add interactive elements like forms and polls into videos, offering a more direct way to capture viewer data than Sendspark.
• It provides an SDK and API to embed video functions into other products, giving developers more flexibility compared to Sendspark's extension-based use.
• A real-time video chatbot is included to answer common questions, which automates a function that requires manual video responses in Sendspark.

Hippo Video's Limitations Compared to Sendspark

• Some users find the platform's interface complex due to its wide range of features. This can create a learning curve, which is different from Sendspark's more direct and simple design.
• Hippo Video's in-app editing tools are sometimes described as inefficient for quick adjustments. This contrasts with Sendspark, which prioritizes a faster creation and editing workflow for simple video messages.
• The tool's pricing structure may feel restrictive to some teams. For example, users note that new features can come with extra costs, unlike Sendspark, which is known for its accessible pricing.

Pricing and Budget Considerations

Hippo Video’s Pro plan is priced at $20 per user per month, with its Teams plan at $60 and Enterprise at $80. While Sendspark does not list specific pricing, it is known for being more accessible, making it a suitable option for teams that need core video functions without the higher cost.

5) Covideo

Covideo is a video message platform for businesses to build relationships with personal video. Users can record and send videos from a desktop or mobile device. The tool supports screen and video capture and integrates with email and CRM systems.

Sales teams use it for outreach, while customer service teams use it to provide support and answer questions. It is for relationship-based businesses that want to connect with customers through video.

Covideo's Main Features

• Offers tailored service workflows where technicians record repair recommendations for managers to approve and send to customers.
• Allows customers to accept or decline repair order quotes directly from the video service page.
• Includes an audio corrector to add a voice-over to recordings made in noisy service bays.
• Integrates with existing CRMs and inventory-management systems.

How Covideo Compares to Sendspark

Average Review Score: 4.8/5 stars based on 69 G2 reviews.

• Covideo offers tailored service workflows, such as for repair recommendations that need manager approval. This provides a more structured process for specific industries compared to Sendspark's general video tools.
• The platform allows customers to accept or decline quotes directly from the video page. This feature creates a more interactive sales experience than the standard call-to-action buttons in Sendspark.
• It includes an audio corrector to improve voice-overs recorded in noisy environments. This tool offers a specific editing advantage for field teams, which is different from Sendspark's general editing functions.
• The tool provides a dedicated mobile application for recording and sending videos from a phone. This gives more flexibility for teams on the go, while Sendspark primarily operates through a browser extension.

Covideo's Limitations Compared to Sendspark

• Covideo provides fewer options for video template customization compared to Sendspark. This can be a limitation for teams that create varied outreach campaigns at scale.
• Some users report that the tool can have performance issues on mobile or with a slow internet connection. This is different from Sendspark, which focuses on smooth video loading and delivery.
• The platform often relies on the recipient to click a link to watch the video. This creates a different user experience compared to Sendspark, where animated previews can encourage more engagement directly from the email.
• Its analytics integration with CRMs can be less detailed. Some users note the desire for deeper viewer tracking within their CRM, which is a different approach from Sendspark's focus on integrated performance data.

Pricing and Budget Considerations

Covideo is often considered a higher-priced tool, whereas Sendspark is known for its accessible pricing. For the most accurate information, we recommend visiting Covideo's official website.

Explore 11x for Digital Sales Workers

If you want to automate parts of your sales process, 11x offers a different approach. Our digital workers handle lead research and personalized outreach, which lets your team focus on closing deals. This is a practical option for scaling sales efforts without increasing headcount.

At 11x, we use AI agents to run your sales playbook. Alice finds accounts, enriches data, and handles outreach, while Julian qualifies leads and schedules meetings. Our platform unifies your GTM stack, replacing the need for separate data, outreach, and warmup tools.

Book a demo to see 11x in action.

6) Dubb

Dubb is a video communication platform for sales and marketing teams. It supports screen and video capture to create personalized videos at scale. The tool helps with client communication, lead generation, and team updates.

It combines video creation, distribution, and performance data into a single system. Sales teams use it for outreach, while marketing departments use it for campaigns to increase engagement and conversion rates.

Dubb's Main Features

• Offers an AI suite with a sales assistant for next-step recommendations and tools to generate videos from text.
• Provides a mobile application with a built-in teleprompter for multi-clip recording.
• Enables broadcast email and SMS campaigns through its marketing automation features.
• Includes an AI tool that analyzes video performance and provides feedback for improvement.

How Dubb Compares to Sendspark

Average Review Score: 4.6/5 stars based on 555 G2 reviews.

• Dubb's AI suite provides sales recommendations and can generate video from text, offering a layer of automation different from Sendspark's manual approach.
• The platform includes a mobile application with a built-in teleprompter, which allows for more polished recording on the go compared to Sendspark's browser-based tool.
• It has built-in marketing automation to send broadcast email and SMS campaigns, a feature for larger-scale outreach than Sendspark provides.
• An AI tool analyzes video performance and suggests improvements, providing a deeper level of feedback than Sendspark's standard analytics.

Dubb's Limitations Compared to Sendspark

• Dubb's extensive features can create a steeper learning curve for new users. This is different from Sendspark, which provides a more straightforward and simple user experience for quick adoption.
• Some users report that its video editing tools can feel less intuitive for quick changes. Sendspark, in comparison, focuses on a more streamlined editing process for simple video messages.
• The platform sometimes experiences delays or video playback issues, according to user feedback. This contrasts with Sendspark, which prioritizes smooth video loading and delivery for a consistent viewer experience.

Pricing and Budget Considerations

Dubb's Pro plan is priced at $59 per month. In contrast, Sendspark is often noted for its accessible pricing, making it a suitable option for teams with tighter budgets. For the most current information, it is best to visit Dubb's official website.

7) Wistia

Wistia is a video platform for businesses, with a focus on B2B promotion. It provides tools to host video, automate campaigns, and analyze performance. The platform helps companies grow an audience and build brand affinity through video. It supports both screen and video capture.

Sales teams use it for personalized video messages. It also supports webinars and product videos. The system allows for video creation at scale for various business functions.

Wistia's Main Features

• Hosts live or pre-recorded webinars with custom branding and automatically repurposes recordings as evergreen content.
• Includes video marketing tools such as in-player lead generation forms, calls-to-action, and built-in video SEO.
• Provides viewer-level engagement heat-maps and performance charts for detailed analytics.
• Offers an ad-free, customizable player with localization support for over 30 languages.

How Wistia Compares to Sendspark

Average Review Score: 4.6/5 stars based on 813 G2 reviews.

• Wistia hosts live and pre-recorded webinars, a function for large-scale events that differs from Sendspark's focus on personal video messages.
• The platform includes in-player lead generation forms and video SEO, which provide more direct marketing functions than Sendspark's standard call-to-action buttons.
• Its analytics include viewer-level engagement heatmaps to give a more granular view of viewer behavior than the general performance metrics in Sendspark.
• A customizable, ad-free player with localization support provides more branding control and accessibility compared to Sendspark's standard player.

Wistia's Limitations Compared to Sendspark

• Wistia's pricing structure is often higher due to its extensive features. This is different from Sendspark, which offers more accessible pricing for teams that need core video messaging tools.
• The platform's focus on broad video marketing can make its interface feel more complex for simple outreach. In comparison, Sendspark provides a more direct user experience designed for quick video messaging.
• Its focus on video hosting means it lacks features like animated GIF previews in emails. This is a key difference from Sendspark, which uses previews to increase engagement directly from the inbox.

Pricing and Budget Considerations

Wistia’s paid plans start at $19 per month for the Plus tier and increase to $79 per month for the Pro plan. This positions it as a higher-cost option compared to Sendspark, which is known for more accessible pricing. For the most current details, check the pricing on Wistia's official website.

8) OneMob

OneMob is a video platform for business communication. It allows users to create and share personalized videos and screen recordings. The tool helps teams connect with customers through video.

Sales and marketing teams use it for outreach and engagement. The platform integrates with other tools to fit into current workflows. It is for companies that want to add a personal touch to communication.

OneMob's Main Features

• It offers a microsite builder to create custom pages that showcase brand and content.
• The platform provides a mobile application with a built-in script teleprompter for recording videos.
• It includes a video approval workflow for team management and content control.
• The tool integrates with content platforms like Zoom, Google Drive, and Dropbox for content uploads.

How OneMob Compares to Sendspark

Average Review Score: 4.9/5 stars based on 143 G2 reviews.

• OneMob includes a microsite builder to create custom pages that showcase content. This offers a different way to present information compared to Sendspark's direct video embeds.
• Its mobile application has a built-in script teleprompter. This feature helps users record more polished videos from a phone, while Sendspark operates mainly through a browser extension.
• The tool provides a video approval workflow for team management. This gives managers control over content before it is sent, a feature not central to Sendspark's workflow.
• It integrates with content platforms like Zoom and Google Drive. This allows users to upload content from different sources, which is a different focus from Sendspark's primary integration points.

OneMob's Limitations Compared to Sendspark

• OneMob often requires the recipient to click a link to watch the video. This is a different experience from Sendspark, which uses animated previews in the email to increase engagement.
• The platform provides fewer options to customize elements like buttons and links. This is different from Sendspark, which offers more flexibility for teams that create varied video campaigns at scale.
• Its workflow can feel more involved due to features like the microsite builder. This contrasts with Sendspark's focus on a simple, direct process for sending quick video messages.

Pricing and Budget Considerations

OneMob offers a free plan, a Pro plan at $25 per user per month, and an Enterprise plan starting at $50. While Sendspark does not list specific pricing, it is known for its accessible pricing. Both tools provide a free entry point, but OneMob offers more transparent pricing for teams that need to forecast costs.

9) Bonjoro

Bonjoro is a video platform for personal outreach. It allows teams to send custom video messages to customers. The tool supports screen and video capture to create this content at scale.

Teams use it to build relationships and guide users through the sales funnel. The goal is to increase customer engagement with a personal touch.

Bonjoro's Main Features

• A mobile application allows users to record and send personal videos from their device.
• The platform supports video creation and delivery directly to a customer's email inbox.
• It connects with existing CRM and email marketing tools to send videos at scale.

How Bonjoro Compares to Sendspark

Average Review Score: 4.8/5 stars based on 57 G2 reviews.

• Bonjoro offers a mobile application to record and send videos from a phone. This provides more flexibility for remote teams compared to Sendspark, which is primarily a browser-based tool.
• The platform's workflow is built around sending personal videos directly to a customer's email. This is a more focused approach on one-to-one engagement than Sendspark's system, which also supports broader video messaging campaigns.
• It emphasizes a simple user experience for quick video creation. This can be more straightforward for users who only need basic recording and sending functions, unlike Sendspark which includes more features for campaign customization.
• The tool integrates with CRMs to create video tasks based on customer activity. This allows for a workflow centered on relationship-building, a different focus from Sendspark's integrations which also cater to scaling automated outreach.

Bonjoro's Limitations Compared to Sendspark

• Bonjoro provides fewer options to customize video campaigns. In comparison, Sendspark allows for more detailed adjustments to calls-to-action and landing pages, which helps teams that run different types of outreach.
• The platform's editing tools are more basic. Some users find this limiting when they need to make detailed changes, a function that is more developed in Sendspark for creating polished video messages.
• It does not create animated GIF previews for emails. This is a key difference from Sendspark, which uses these previews to encourage more clicks directly from a recipient's inbox.
• The tool's analytics focus on individual engagement. Sendspark, on the other hand, offers features to track performance across larger automated campaigns, giving a more complete picture of outreach success.

Pricing and Budget Considerations

Bonjoro offers transparent pricing with a free plan, a Starter plan at $19 per month, and a Pro plan at $39. While Sendspark does not list specific prices, it is known for being accessible, making both tools strong options for budget-conscious teams, though Bonjoro provides more predictability for cost forecasting.

10) Vimeo

Vimeo is a video platform with tools to create, host, and share video content. The service supports screen and video capture for business communication. Teams use the platform to produce personalized videos at scale and manage their content library.

It also offers analytics to track video performance and viewer engagement. This data helps teams measure the impact of their video efforts.

Vimeo's Main Features

• Offers live streaming capabilities and includes specific tools for streamers.
• Provides a hosted platform with a video archive for storing and managing content.
• Includes an embeddable video player and a profile channel for sharing and showcasing videos.
• Features audience tools to help engage with viewers.

How Vimeo Compares to Sendspark

Average Review Score: 4.3/5 stars based on 695 G2 reviews.

• Vimeo provides live streaming capabilities with specific tools for streamers. This function supports large-scale events, which is different from Sendspark's focus on personal video messages.
• The platform includes a robust video archive for content management. This helps organize large video libraries, offering more structure than Sendspark's simpler storage system.
• It offers a customizable video player. This feature gives more control over branding and the viewing experience compared to Sendspark's standard player.
• This tool has audience engagement tools and supports revenue generation through on-demand services, a different use case from Sendspark, which is designed for sales outreach.

Vimeo's Limitations Compared to Sendspark

• Vimeo's platform is for general video hosting, which can make its interface less direct for sales teams. This is different from Sendspark, which focuses on tools for quick, personalized video outreach.
• The tool does not create animated GIF previews for emails. Sendspark uses this feature to help increase engagement and click-through rates directly from a recipient's inbox.
• Some users note that its pricing can be high for teams that only need simple video messaging. In comparison, Sendspark is often considered a more accessible option for core sales functions.
• Its wide range of features for hosting and live events can create a learning curve. This contrasts with Sendspark, which offers a more focused user experience for sending personal videos quickly.

Pricing Models and Budget Impact

Vimeo’s paid plans start at $20 per month for the Starter tier, with Standard and Advanced plans at $33 and $108, respectively. This makes it a higher-priced option than Sendspark, which is known for more accessible pricing. For current details, visit Vimeo's official website.

Which One Should You Go With?

The right Sendspark alternative depends on your team's specific needs, budget, and workflow. This guide analyzed several options, outlining their features and limitations to help you find a suitable tool for your business.

If your goal is to automate sales outreach rather than just send videos, consider a different approach. 11x provides digital workers that manage lead research and personalized communication, allowing your sales team to focus on closing deals instead of manual tasks.