Tolstoy Alternatives

Many people use Tolstoy for good reasons. It excels at screen and video recording and helps you create interactive videos. This makes it a strong option when you need to engage viewers directly or explain complex topics clearly.

Still, some users say the editing tools are limited or that integrations can be tricky. For this, we analyzed the best alternatives based on G2 reviews. We compare their pros and cons to help you shortlist your options. Let's get started.

Consider 11x for Sales Automation

If your goal is sales automation, 11x presents a different option. It uses digital workers to handle specific sales tasks. This approach lets your sales representatives concentrate on activities that need a human touch, like client relationships and final negotiations.

11x is a go-to-market platform that uses AI agents to automate sales processes. An agent named Alice finds prospects, conducts outreach on email and LinkedIn, and keeps the CRM current. A second agent, Julian, qualifies inbound leads and books meetings.

The platform combines functions that often require separate tools. This includes data enrichment, outreach automation, and email warmup, all unified within one system.

Tolstoy Alternatives

Here is a detailed breakdown of the top Tolstoy alternatives. Each review covers pricing, core features, and how they stack up against Tolstoy in terms of strengths and weaknesses.

1) VideoAsk

VideoAsk is an interactive video platform for conversations at scale. Visitors watch a prerecorded video, then respond with text, audio, or video. This creates a "video funnel" that replaces static forms to collect data and capture leads.

The product is code-free and integrates with over 1,500 apps via Zapier.

VideoAsk's Main Features

• Allows asynchronous video interviews for candidate screening, letting applicants reply on their own time.
• Switches from asynchronous video to live calls for real-time conversations when necessary.
• Uses video chatbots with automated branching logic to guide viewers to the next relevant step.
• Gathers Net Promoter Score responses directly through video interactions.

VideoAsk vs. Tolstoy: Key Differences

Average Review Score: 4.5/5 stars based on 13 G2 reviews.

• VideoAsk supports asynchronous video interviews, so hiring managers can screen candidates who respond on their own schedule. This is a specialized recruitment feature not found in Tolstoy.
• The platform allows a switch from a recorded video to a live call for immediate conversation. This real-time option differs from Tolstoy's exclusively pre-recorded interactions.
• It builds video funnels with branching logic to guide viewers. This system is more focused on lead qualification than Tolstoy's general-purpose interactive videos.
• Users collect Net Promoter Score feedback directly through the video interface. This provides a more direct feedback mechanism compared to Tolstoy's engagement tools.

Where VideoAsk Falls Short Compared to Tolstoy

• VideoAsk does not include a screen recording feature. This makes it less suitable than Tolstoy for creating product demonstrations or software tutorials that require capturing on-screen activity.
• The tool provides limited video editing functions. Compared to Tolstoy, some users may find it lacks advanced options for trimming clips or adding detailed on-screen elements.
• It is highly specialized for conversational funnels and feedback. Tolstoy, on the other hand, offers a more flexible platform for a broader variety of interactive video use cases, like employee onboarding.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

A direct pricing comparison between VideoAsk and Tolstoy is difficult, as specific plan details are not publicly listed. For the most current information on VideoAsk, we recommend visiting the company's official website.

2) Vidyard

Vidyard is a video platform with AI capabilities for sales teams. It lets users record their screen, create, and send personalized videos at scale. The tool supports prospect outreach, sales enablement, and corporate communications to help close deals faster.

An AI agent automates the delivery of personalized videos. This allows sales reps to concentrate on high-value conversations instead of repetitive tasks.

Vidyard's Main Features

• Deploys a Video Agent with an AI Avatar to automatically send personalized videos and automate sales workflows.
• Hosts video assets in a central library and uses engagement triggers to activate the Video Agent for automated follow-ups.
• Connects natively with tools like Salesforce and Salesloft, and pushes engagement data directly into a user's CRM.
• Offers AI Avatars and an AI Script Generator as add-on products for scalable video creation.

Vidyard vs. Tolstoy: Key Differences

Average Review Score: 4.5/5 stars based on 808 G2 reviews.

• Vidyard uses a Video Agent with an AI Avatar to automate personalized outreach. This is different from Tolstoy, which requires manual creation for its interactive videos.
• It connects natively with CRMs like Salesforce to automatically push engagement data. This provides a more integrated sales workflow than Tolstoy's setup.
• The platform includes an AI Script Generator to help sales teams produce content, an option not available in Tolstoy.
• Vidyard organizes videos in a central library with engagement triggers for automated follow-ups. This asset management system is more sales-focused than Tolstoy's interactive video tools.

Where Vidyard Falls Short Compared to Tolstoy

• Vidyard's platform automates video delivery for sales outreach. This differs from Tolstoy, which focuses on building interactive videos with clickable choices and branching paths for viewer engagement.
• The tool is highly specialized for sales workflows. For general purposes like interactive training or onboarding, Tolstoy provides a more flexible platform that is not tied to a specific department.
• Some user reviews mention that Vidyard has limited in-app video editing capabilities. Tolstoy, by comparison, may offer more control for trimming clips or adding simple on-screen elements directly within its editor.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Vidyard offers a free plan and a Starter tier at $59 per user per month. A direct comparison is difficult as Tolstoy does not publicly list its prices. For complete details, visit Vidyard's official website.

3) Loom

Loom is an AI-powered platform for video messages. Users record a screen, camera, or both, and share videos instantly across integrations like Slack and Google Workspace. It lets teams communicate asynchronously with more context than text provides.

Use cases include personalized sales pitches and code review walkthroughs. Teams also use it to troubleshoot customer support issues. The platform has options for individuals and enterprises.

Loom's Main Features

• Uses Loom AI to automatically enhance video quality and convert scripts into documents, messages, or bug reports.
• Includes a video editor for trimming, stitching clips, and adding custom backgrounds or on-screen elements like text and arrows.
• Generates automatic transcriptions and closed captions in over 50 languages and provides viewer engagement tools like comments and calls-to-action.
• Offers enterprise-level security features, including single sign-on (SSO), SCIM, and custom data-retention policies.

Loom vs. Tolstoy: Key Differences

Average Review Score: 4.7/5 stars based on 2,119 G2 reviews.

• Loom uses its AI to automatically create video summaries, documents, and bug reports. This differs from Tolstoy, which focuses on manually built interactive video paths.
• The platform generates automatic transcriptions and closed captions in over 50 languages, offering wider accessibility than Tolstoy's core video functions.
• It provides more extensive video editing capabilities, like stitching separate clips together. This gives users more creative control compared to Tolstoy's editor.
• For large companies, Loom includes enterprise security options such as single sign-on (SSO) and custom data retention policies.

Where Loom Falls Short Compared to Tolstoy

• Loom does not offer interactive video branching. Unlike Tolstoy, it does not let viewers make choices that change the video's path. This makes it less suited for creating personalized sales funnels or custom training modules.
• The tool's primary function is asynchronous communication, not building interactive experiences. Tolstoy, by comparison, is designed to create clickable videos that can guide a user, collect information, or function like a visual chatbot.
• Its engagement features are generally limited to calls-to-action and comments. This is different from Tolstoy, where interactions are built into the video's structure for use cases like in-video quizzes or surveys.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Loom provides a free Starter plan, a Business plan for $15 per user per month, and a Business + AI plan for $20. A direct cost comparison with Tolstoy is difficult because its pricing is not public. For complete details on Loom's plans, visit Loom's official website.

4) Wistia

Wistia is a video platform for businesses. It provides tools to host videos, analyze performance, and support marketing. The platform includes a screen and webcam recorder to create new content.

Use cases range from lead generation with in-video forms to personalized sales messages and customer support tutorials. It also serves internal teams for company announcements.

Wistia's Main Features

• Hosts live or pre-recorded webinars with custom branding and native connections for registration and follow-up.
• Provides built-in video SEO features and an API to create custom experiences.
• Delivers viewer-level engagement heat-maps and syncs performance data to a marketing tech stack for attribution.
• Offers an ad-free, brand-customizable player with localization support for over 30 languages.

Wistia vs. Tolstoy: Key Differences

Average Review Score: 4.6/5 stars based on 813 G2 reviews.

• Wistia provides tools to host live or pre-recorded webinars with custom branding. This is a feature not found in Tolstoy, which centers on creating interactive, asynchronous videos.
• The platform delivers detailed viewer-level heat-maps to show engagement. This offers a more granular analysis of video performance compared to Tolstoy's general interaction metrics.
• It includes built-in video SEO features to help content rank in search results. Tolstoy's platform, in contrast, is more focused on direct viewer interaction within a video.
• This tool connects natively with marketing automation platforms like HubSpot to sync lead data. This provides a more direct integration for marketing campaigns than Tolstoy's setup.

Where Wistia Falls Short Compared to Tolstoy

• Wistia does not support interactive video branching. This is different from Tolstoy, where you can build videos with clickable choices that guide viewers down personalized paths for quizzes or sales funnels.
• The tool centers on video marketing and hosting, not direct, two-way conversations. Tolstoy, in comparison, helps build conversational experiences where viewers can respond with video, audio, or text.
• Some users may find its data collection methods, like in-video forms, less dynamic. Tolstoy gathers information through a series of interactive questions built into the video flow, which can feel more conversational.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Wistia offers a free plan and paid tiers starting at $19 per month. A direct comparison with Tolstoy is difficult as its pricing is not public, but you can visit Wistia's official website for complete details.

5) Bonjoro

Bonjoro is a platform for personalized video messages. It helps teams connect with customers through one-to-one videos. You can record your screen or use your camera to create content. The tool connects with other apps to trigger video tasks based on customer actions.

Use cases include welcome messages for new sign-ups, thank you videos for purchases, and personal sales outreach. The goal is to build customer relationships.

Bonjoro's Main Features

• Collects video or text testimonials through one-click links and displays them using embeddable “Wall of Love” widgets.
• Triggers automated video tasks based on events in a CRM, such as a new lead, order, or donation.
• Sends personal video messages using custom templates that include branding and calls-to-action.
• Uses special formatting to help videos stand out in an email inbox and improve deliverability.

Bonjoro vs. Tolstoy: Key Differences

Average Review Score: 4.8/5 stars based on 57 G2 reviews.

• Bonjoro sends one-to-one personal video messages to build customer relationships. This approach is different from Tolstoy, which creates interactive videos with branching paths for wider audiences.
• The tool connects with a CRM to create video tasks based on customer actions, like a new purchase. This workflow is more focused on personal outreach than Tolstoy's in-video interactions.
• It allows users to collect video testimonials with a single link and display them in an embeddable widget. Tolstoy can gather video feedback but does not have a comparable public display feature.
• The platform uses special formatting to help videos stand out in an email inbox and improve deliverability. This is a specific email-focused feature not found in Tolstoy.

Where Bonjoro Falls Short Compared to Tolstoy

• Bonjoro focuses on one-way personal messages. It does not have Tolstoy's interactive features, like clickable buttons or branching logic. This makes it less suitable for creating self-guided experiences such as product tours or training materials.
• The tool is designed for one-way communication. In contrast, Tolstoy allows for two-way conversations where viewers can respond with video, audio, or text within the same interface, which can feel more like a dialogue.
• Its platform is highly specialized for personal outreach. For general use cases like interactive employee onboarding or complex training materials, Tolstoy offers a more flexible set of tools not tied to a specific workflow.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Bonjoro offers a free plan and paid tiers starting at $19 per month. A direct comparison with Tolstoy is difficult as its pricing is not public. For complete details, visit Bonjoro's official website.

Consider 11x for Sales Automation

If your focus is on automating sales tasks, 11x offers a solution with digital workers. These AI agents handle prospecting and lead qualification. This allows your sales team to concentrate on closing deals and building client relationships instead of repetitive outreach.

At 11x, we run your sales playbook with AI. Alice finds accounts, enriches their data, and starts outreach, while Julian qualifies inbound leads and schedules meetings. Our platform unifies data, outreach, and email warmup, so you don't need extra tools or hires.

Book a demo to see 11x in action.

6) BombBomb

BombBomb is a video platform for business professionals. Users can record their screen or camera and send personal videos from a computer or mobile device. The tool connects with email and other systems to replace text with face-to-face communication.

Use cases include sales follow-ups and client updates. The platform helps users build trust and improve response rates through a more human connection.

BombBomb's Main Features

• Automates outreach campaigns with smart assignment and fallback logic.
• Provides a single dashboard to track views, engagement, and team performance.
• Offers custom-branded video player pages at a company or team level with calls-to-action.
• Allows users to record and send videos from iOS or Android mobile apps.

BombBomb vs. Tolstoy: Key Differences

Average Review Score: 4.7/5 stars based on 583 G2 reviews.

• BombBomb provides mobile apps for iOS and Android to record and send videos from anywhere. This offers more flexibility for on-the-go communication compared to Tolstoy's platform, which is primarily web-based.
• The platform automates video outreach campaigns with specific assignment logic. This is different from Tolstoy, which focuses on building interactive video paths rather than managing email campaign sequences.
• It offers a single dashboard to track video views and team performance across campaigns. This provides a more centralized overview for sales teams compared to Tolstoy's focus on in-video interaction data.
• Users can create custom-branded video player pages for their messages. This helps maintain brand consistency in outreach, a feature that is more sales-oriented than Tolstoy's general interactive video builder.

Where BombBomb Falls Short Compared to Tolstoy

• BombBomb focuses on one-way video messages. This is different from Tolstoy, which lets you build interactive videos with clickable choices. This makes BombBomb less suited for creating self-guided experiences like product tours or training quizzes.
• The tool is designed for one-way communication. In contrast, Tolstoy allows for two-way conversations where viewers can respond with video, audio, or text. This makes Tolstoy's approach feel more like a dialogue for collecting customer feedback.
• Its platform is highly specialized for personal outreach. For general use cases like interactive employee onboarding, Tolstoy offers a more flexible set of tools. This is because Tolstoy is not tied to a specific sales workflow.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

A direct cost comparison with Tolstoy is difficult because BombBomb does not publicly list its pricing. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, visit BombBomb's official website.

7) Hippo Video

Hippo Video is a video platform for business teams. It provides tools to record a screen or camera, edit the content, and distribute it through various channels. The system is built for sales, marketing, and customer support functions.

Use cases cover personalized video emails for sales, product tutorials for marketing, and video responses for support tickets. The platform helps teams create and manage video assets for customer communication.

Hippo Video's Main Features

• Converts text, documents, or prompts into avatar-driven videos with scripts and scenes in over 30 languages.
• Creates an AI avatar clone that mirrors a user's voice and style for use in demos and support videos.
• Provides an SDK, API, and widgets to embed video creation, editing, and playback into other applications.
• Offers SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and HIPAA compliance for data security.

Hippo Video vs. Tolstoy: Key Differences

Average Review Score: 4.5/5 stars based on 734 G2 reviews.

• Hippo Video converts text into videos with AI avatars. This is different from Tolstoy, which requires users to record their own video content for interactions.
• It provides a developer kit (SDK) and API to add video functions into other applications. This allows for more technical customization than Tolstoy's standalone platform.
• The platform offers SOC 2, GDPR, and HIPAA compliance. This provides a specific level of data security for businesses, a detail not highlighted for Tolstoy.
• This tool creates an AI clone of a user's voice and appearance for scalable videos. Tolstoy, in contrast, focuses on manually recorded content for its interactive paths.

Where Hippo Video Falls Short Compared to Tolstoy

• Hippo Video offers interactive elements like polls and forms, but it does not support the multi-path video branching that Tolstoy provides. This makes it a less direct option for building "choose-your-own-path" tutorials.
• The platform focuses on one-way video distribution. It does not have the built-in function for viewers to respond with their own video or audio, which is a core part of Tolstoy's conversational approach.
• Some user reviews note that the interface can feel slow. This might be a consideration for teams that need to produce content quickly, compared to Tolstoy's more specialized and direct video builder.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Hippo Video provides a free plan, a Pro plan for $20, a Teams plan for $60, and an Enterprise plan for $80. A direct comparison with Tolstoy is difficult because its pricing is not public. For the most current information, visit Hippo Video's official website.

8) CloudApp

CloudApp is a visual communication platform. It lets users capture their screen through video, GIFs, and annotated screenshots. The tool creates a shareable link for any capture to facilitate quick information exchange.

Teams in sales, support, and engineering use it to create product demos, explain complex problems, or provide visual feedback. The focus is on speed and ease of use for workplace communication.

CloudApp's Main Features

• Offers sales gamification features, including custom and team-based competition templates.
• Integrates with CRM systems and uses AI to provide deal predictions and sales forecasts.
• Includes reporting tools with user, role, and access management for enterprise scalability.
• Streams performance data to TVs and connects with social collaboration platforms.

CloudApp vs. Tolstoy: Key Differences

Average Review Score: 4.5/5 stars based on 23 G2 reviews.

• CloudApp offers sales gamification features, including team competition templates. This is different from Tolstoy, which uses interactive video for viewer engagement rather than internal team motivation.
• The tool uses AI to provide deal predictions and sales forecasts from CRM data. This is a more sales-specific function compared to Tolstoy's focus on building interactive video paths.
• The platform integrates deeply with CRM systems to analyze sales data. This provides more specific sales insights than Tolstoy's general-purpose integrations.
• It includes reporting tools with user and role management for large teams. This differs from Tolstoy, where analytics center on viewer interaction paths rather than team performance metrics.

Where CloudApp Falls Short Compared to Tolstoy

• CloudApp is designed for one-way visual messages and does not support interactive video branching. In comparison, Tolstoy lets viewers navigate different video paths, which is useful for creating self-guided product tours or quizzes.
• The tool does not have a feature for viewers to respond with their own video, audio, or text. This makes it different from Tolstoy, which allows two-way conversations for collecting direct customer feedback or video testimonials.
• Its primary function is to quickly share screen captures, GIFs, and screenshots. Tolstoy, on the other hand, is built for creating structured interactive experiences with in-video surveys or lead qualification forms.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

CloudApp's Revenue Intelligence Platform starts at £60.00 per year for 50 users. A direct comparison with Tolstoy is difficult, as its pricing is not publicly available. For complete details, visit CloudApp's official website.

9) Sendspark

Sendspark is a video platform for personalized outreach. Users record their screen or camera to create and share videos with customers. Teams use the tool for sales, to onboard new clients, and for account updates, with the goal to build trust and get replies.

Sendspark's Main Features

• Personalizes video thumbnails with the recipient’s name and logo to increase engagement.
• Requests and collects videos from customers or team members through a simple link, with no installation required.
• Provides collaborative workspaces for teams or clients to manage video creation for prospective customers.
• Creates custom video landing pages with unique branding to personalize the viewing experience.

Sendspark vs. Tolstoy: Key Differences

Average Review Score: 4.7/5 stars based on 370 G2 reviews.

• Sendspark personalizes video thumbnails with a recipient’s name and logo. This is different from Tolstoy, which focuses on in-video interactions rather than email-specific personalization.
• It allows users to request and collect videos from customers through a simple link. This provides a direct way to gather testimonials, a more specific use case compared to Tolstoy's general video response feature.
• The platform provides collaborative workspaces for teams or clients to manage video creation together. This feature is designed for agency or team workflows, which differs from Tolstoy's individual creator focus.
• Users can create custom video landing pages with unique branding. This helps to personalize the entire viewing experience, while Tolstoy embeds its interactive videos directly on a user's site.

Where Sendspark Falls Short Compared to Tolstoy

• Sendspark focuses on one-way video messages for outreach. It does not support interactive video branching, which is different from Tolstoy's ability to create self-guided product tours or quizzes with clickable choices for viewers.
• The tool is designed for one-way communication. Unlike Tolstoy, it does not allow viewers to respond with video, audio, or text within the player. This makes it less suited for collecting direct feedback in a conversational format.
• Its platform is built for personal outreach, not for creating complex interactive experiences. Tolstoy, in contrast, allows for in-video surveys or lead forms that guide a user through a structured flow, which can feel more engaging.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

A direct cost comparison with Tolstoy is difficult as its pricing is not public. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, visit Sendspark's official website.

10) Dubb

Dubb is a video communication platform that helps sales and marketing teams drive action with video. Users can record their screen and camera, add calls-to-action, and distribute the content through email and social media. It is used for sales outreach, client communication, and team updates.

Dubb's Main Features

• Tracks campaign performance and individual recipient engagement.
• Provides analytics and reporting on video content.
• Offers tools for content creation and video management.
• Includes video hosting and a dedicated video player.

Dubb vs. Tolstoy: Key Differences

Average Review Score: 4.6/5 stars based on 555 G2 reviews.

• Dubb tracks individual recipient engagement, showing who watches a video and for how long. This provides more detailed sales analytics compared to Tolstoy's focus on general interaction paths.
• It offers a dedicated mobile app to record and send videos from any location. This allows for more on-the-go flexibility than Tolstoy's primarily web-based system.
• The platform lets users track the performance of entire video campaigns. This is a sales-focused feature, different from Tolstoy's tools for building single, interactive videos.
• This tool provides a Slack app and an Outlook add-in for sharing videos directly. This offers a more integrated communication experience compared to Tolstoy's standard sharing options.

Where Dubb Falls Short Compared to Tolstoy

• Dubb is designed for one-way video messages and lacks interactive branching. Unlike Tolstoy, it cannot create videos with clickable choices that guide viewers down personalized paths.
• The platform does not support two-way video conversations. This is different from Tolstoy, which lets viewers respond with video or audio, making it more suitable for collecting customer feedback.
• Some users may find its focus on sales outreach limiting. Tolstoy, by comparison, is built for a wider range of interactive experiences, like in-video surveys or lead qualification forms.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Dubb's Pro plan is available for $59.00 per month. A direct cost comparison with Tolstoy is difficult because its pricing is not public. For complete details, visit Dubb's official website.

Which One Should You Go With?

The right Tolstoy alternative depends on your specific needs, from sales outreach to team communication. This guide broke down the top options to help you make an informed decision.

If your main goal is sales automation, 11x offers a different approach. Its AI agents handle prospecting, outreach, and lead qualification, which lets your sales team focus on closing deals instead of repetitive tasks.