Walnut Alternatives

You might be using Walnut for its no-code platform to create interactive product demos. It performs well for building personalized sales and marketing experiences and standardizing demos across your team, all without needing engineering help.

But like any tool, it has limits. Some users report a learning curve or occasional software bugs. We've analyzed G2 reviews to identify the best alternatives, comparing their pros and cons against Walnut to help you create a shortlist. Let's get started.

11x: Digital Workers for Sales

For teams interested in adding digital workers to their sales efforts, 11x offers a specialized approach. It automates certain sales functions, which can help your team focus on closing deals rather than on repetitive administrative work.

11x is a go-to-market platform that uses AI agents to handle the sales process. Its agent, Alice, identifies promising prospects, conducts outreach through email and LinkedIn, and maintains your CRM data.

Another agent, Julian, handles inbound lead qualification and schedules meetings. The platform combines functions like data enrichment, outreach, and email warmup, removing the need for multiple separate tools.

Walnut Alternatives

Below is a detailed breakdown of each Walnut alternative. We cover their pricing, main features, and compare their advantages and drawbacks against Walnut.

1) Navattic

Navattic is an interactive product-demo platform for go-to-market teams. It allows them to create and embed no-code, clickable demos across the buyer journey. The platform captures engagement data like time spent and steps viewed to identify prospect intent.

Use cases include website lead capture, sales follow-ups, and target-account marketing. Companies report higher website conversion rates and demo engagement with the tool.

Navattic's Main Features

• Inserts dynamic variables so every prospect sees content relevant to them.
• Translates and distributes demos globally for international campaigns.
• Downloads demos for offline use at trade shows and conferences.
• Uses pre-built playbooks to surface buyer activity with email alerts, Slack alerts, and account tracking.

How Navattic Compares To Walnut

Average Review score: 4.8/5 stars based on 448 G2 reviews.

• Navattic provides the option to download demos for offline use at conferences, a feature that offers more flexibility than Walnut's online-only demos.
• It supports demo translation and global distribution, which helps teams that run international campaigns.
• The platform uses pre-built playbooks to send immediate alerts on buyer activity to tools like Slack, which offers a different notification system compared to Walnut's engagement tracking.
• Unlike Walnut, Navattic offers a free starter plan, which lets smaller teams or those with limited budgets try the tool before making a financial commitment.

Where Navattic Compares Less Favorably To Walnut

• Some users report minor user experience issues with Navattic's capture and editing tools. This can make the demo creation process slightly less smooth compared to Walnut's editor.
• The platform's demo organization and management can sometimes feel clunky. This is different from Walnut, which provides a more streamlined way to manage a large library of demos.
• Its analytics and reporting features may have a learning curve for new users. Walnut, in comparison, offers analytics that some teams find more straightforward to implement and understand from the start.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Navattic provides a free starter plan, an option Walnut does not offer. For paid tiers, Walnut's entry-level Ignite plan is $750 per year, whereas Navattic's paid plans begin at $500 per month. This makes Walnut's paid offerings more accessible for teams ready for an annual commitment.

2) Reprise

Reprise is an enterprise demo platform for go-to-market teams. It uses AI to create, customize, and maintain interactive product demos. The platform automates the configuration and population of demo environments for sales and marketing teams.

This approach reduces infrastructure overhead. Use cases include live sales calls, website product tours, and prospect sandboxes. The tool is for large B2B software companies that require governance and scalability.

Reprise's Main Features

• Offers three demo modes: a guided demo using a captured front-end replica, a live-app overlay with AI data injection, and a full application clone.
• Uses AI to automate the configuration, data generation, and population of demo tenants.
• Clones the full application down to the code level to create fully interactive sandbox demos.
• Includes enterprise security features like role-based access control (RBAC) and single sign-on (SSO) in every package.

How Reprise Compares To Walnut

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 162 G2 reviews.

• Reprise provides three demo creation options: a guided tour, a live-app overlay, and a full application clone. This offers more flexibility for different use cases than Walnut's single front-end capture approach.
• It uses AI to automatically configure and populate demo environments with data. This differs from Walnut, where users often perform more manual data entry and customization.
• The platform includes enterprise-grade security features like role-based access control (RBAC) and single sign-on (SSO) in every package, providing a different security framework compared to Walnut.
• This tool supports live demonstrations with an overlay that injects AI-generated data into the live app. This allows for real-time, personalized demos, a different approach from Walnut's pre-built interactive tours.

Where Reprise Compares Less Favorably To Walnut

• Some users report that the demo creation and editing process in Reprise can be complex. Walnut, in comparison, provides a no-code editor that many teams find more straightforward for quick edits.
• The platform's implementation can take longer, with an average setup time of about three months. This is different from Walnut, which is often noted for a faster onboarding process.
• Its system for demo management can sometimes feel less organized when a team has a large library of demos. Walnut, on the other hand, offers a more centralized way to manage extensive demo content.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Reprise does not publicly list its pricing, but its enterprise focus suggests a higher price point. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Reprise's official website.

3) Storylane

Storylane is a no-code demo-automation platform to create interactive product demos. Teams capture product screens with a browser extension and use an HTML editor for changes. Its AI can generate walkthrough text and voice-overs. The platform provides analytics and account de-anonymization to identify prospects.

Use cases include lead generation with embedded website tours and sales enablement through personalized demos. It also supports product launches and provides data for follow-up outreach.

Storylane's Main Features

• Provides a centralized “deal room” where sellers collect every asset a buyer needs.
• Uses AI for instant demo creation, automated product discovery, and to qualify leads.
• Its AI writes step copy, creates voice-overs, and adds human-like video avatars to demos.
• Creates full demo environments that prospects can explore hands-on.

How Storylane Compares To Walnut

Average Review score: 4.8/5 stars based on 771 G2 reviews.

• Storylane uses AI to generate demo text, voice-overs, and video avatars. This provides a different level of automation compared to Walnut's manual content creation.
• The platform offers a centralized “deal room” where sellers can collect every asset a buyer needs. This is a different approach to sales enablement than Walnut’s demo-focused library.
• It creates full demo environments that prospects can explore hands-on. This offers a more interactive experience than the guided tours typically built with Walnut.
• This tool's AI can translate demos into more than 25 languages. This feature supports global campaigns in a way that is different from Walnut's standard offerings.

Where Storylane Compares Less Favorably

• The system to organize demos in Storylane can feel less structured with a large number of demos. Walnut, in contrast, provides a more centralized library that simplifies the management of extensive demo collections.
• Some users find that the platform offers fewer options for detailed visual edits. This is different from Walnut, which provides a robust editor to fine-tune every element within a captured screen.
• The tool's screen capture process sometimes encounters technical glitches. This can require more adjustments compared to Walnut, where the capture functionality is often a more stable part of the workflow.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Storylane offers a monthly starter plan at $50 for one user, while Walnut's entry-level plan is an annual commitment of $750 for three seats. This makes Storylane more accessible for individuals, but Walnut's plan provides a lower per-seat cost for small teams. For detailed pricing, visit Storylane's official website.

4) Tourial

Tourial is a platform for go-to-market teams to create interactive product tours. It provides a way to build self-guided demos that showcase software functionality. These tours can be embedded on a website for lead capture or shared with prospects during the sales cycle.

Tourial's Main Features

• It provides centralized hubs called Tour Centers where visitors can browse collections of tours tailored to their persona or industry.
• The platform uses AI to automatically generate tour copy and structure, which speeds up the creation process.
• Users can embed tours across multiple channels, such as webpages, social posts, emails, and ads.
• It offers an AI-assisted platform for planning, building, and optimizing interactive micro tours.

How Tourial Compares To Walnut

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 83 G2 reviews.

• Tourial provides centralized hubs called Tour Centers, which let visitors browse collections of tours. This differs from Walnut's library by creating a personalized content hub for buyers.
• It uses AI to automatically generate tour copy and structure. This can speed up the creation process, unlike Walnut, which relies on manual content entry.
• This tool lets you embed tours across many channels, including webpages, social posts, and emails. This provides more distribution options than Walnut's typical sharing methods.
• The platform specializes in creating interactive micro tours. This approach is for quick, focused product showcases, which is different from Walnut's more comprehensive demo format.

Where Tourial Compares Less Favorably To Walnut

• Some users report that Tourial's content management can feel less organized for large tour libraries. Walnut, in contrast, offers a more centralized system to manage a high volume of demos.
• The platform's analytics can have a learning curve for new users. This is different from Walnut, which provides analytics that teams often find easier to understand from the start.
• Tourial offers fewer options for detailed visual customization within a tour. Walnut, by comparison, provides a more robust editor that allows for fine-tuning every element on a captured screen.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Tourial does not publicly list its pricing, so a direct comparison to Walnut's entry-level plan of $750 per year is not possible. For accurate pricing, we recommend visiting Tourial's official website.

5) Demostack

Demostack is a demo creation platform. It clones your live product to create a stable, code-free replica for go-to-market teams. This lets them build interactive demos without engineering support.

Use cases include live sales presentations, interactive website tours, and materials for follow-up. The goal is to provide a hands-on product experience in a controlled environment for prospects.

Demostack's Main Features

• It provides three demo formats: clickable product tours, tailored live demos, and customizable sandboxes for prospects.
• The platform supports the entire deal cycle with assets for pre-call marketing, in-call presentations, and post-call follow-ups.
• It includes enterprise features like SOC 2 compliance, integrations with tools like Salesforce and Slack, and access to expert demo coaches.

How Demostack Compares To Walnut

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 72 G2 reviews.

• Demostack provides three demo formats, including clickable tours, live demos, and prospect sandboxes. This offers more variety compared to Walnut's focus on guided, interactive tours.
• It clones the full product front-end to create a high-fidelity replica that includes animations and pop-ups. This is different from Walnut, which captures screens to build its interactive demos.
• The platform supports live sales presentations with tailored demo environments. This provides a different use case than Walnut's pre-built, shareable product tours.
• This tool allows you to create customizable sandboxes for prospects to explore on their own. This offers a hands-on experience, unlike the guided path of a typical Walnut demo.

Where Demostack Compares Less Favorably

• Some users report that product updates require them to recreate demos from scratch. This process can be more time-consuming compared to Walnut, where teams can often edit individual screens to reflect small changes.
• Its editing tools can sometimes present minor bugs, such as misaligned text boxes. This is different from Walnut, which provides an editor that many users consider more stable for making detailed visual changes.
• The tool's system to organize a large number of demos can feel less structured. In contrast, Walnut provides a more centralized library that simplifies the management of extensive demo collections.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Demostack does not publicly list its pricing, so a direct comparison to Walnut's entry-level plan of $750 per year is not possible. For the most accurate pricing, we recommend visiting Demostack's official website.

Add Digital Workers with 11x

If your team wants to automate sales functions, 11x provides digital workers for tasks like outreach and lead qualification. This approach can free up your sales team to focus on closing deals. Explore 11x if this fits your go-to-market strategy.

With 11x, we run your sales playbook. Our AI agent, Alice, finds accounts, enriches their data, and handles outreach. Meanwhile, Julian qualifies prospects and schedules meetings. The platform combines functions like intent signals and email warmup, replacing the need for multiple tools.

Book a demo to see how it works.

6) Saleo

Saleo is a platform to create interactive product demos. It gives go-to-market teams the ability to build customized demo environments. These demos work for live sales calls or as self-guided tours for prospects.

The tool provides a hands-on product experience inside a controlled space. This helps teams show software functions without engineering support.

Saleo's Main Features

• Overwrites data inside a running product with its Saleo Live™ AI engine to let presenters tailor a demo on the fly.
• Generates industry-specific demo datasets in seconds with a prompt-based AI agent to eliminate manual entry.
• Records a live demo session with Saleo Capture™ and converts it into an interactive guided tour or a lite sandbox to share asynchronously.
• Pushes edited data directly into the live tenant to ensure dashboards, filters, and analytics render correctly.

How Saleo Compares To Walnut

Average Review score: 4.9/5 stars based on 163 G2 reviews.

• Saleo injects real-time, editable data directly into a live product. This allows for on-the-fly customizations during a presentation, which differs from Walnut's pre-built interactive tours.
• It uses a prompt-based AI to generate industry-specific datasets for demos. This approach reduces the manual data entry that is often required with Walnut.
• The tool can record a live demo and convert it into a shareable, interactive tour. This provides a different creation workflow compared to Walnut, where users build tours from captured screens.
• This platform pushes data edits directly into the live product environment. This ensures that dynamic elements like dashboards and analytics render correctly, offering a different level of fidelity than Walnut's screen-capture method.

Where Saleo Compares Less Favorably To Walnut

• Some users find that managing different data stories within Saleo's demos can become complex. This is different from Walnut, where each demo is a self-contained asset in a more straightforward library system.
• The platform may present a learning curve for new users, and some report a lack of guidance. This differs from Walnut, which many teams find more intuitive to adopt due to its straightforward no-code interface.
• Since Saleo modifies a live product environment, some users report occasional issues with data rendering correctly. This is a different challenge compared to Walnut, which uses a screen-capture method that provides a more predictable editing experience.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Saleo does not publicly list its pricing, so a direct comparison to Walnut's entry-level plan of $750 per year is not possible. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Saleo's official website.

7) Supademo

Supademo is a platform to create interactive product demos. It uses a browser extension to capture clicks and processes, which then become step-by-step guides. The tool helps teams produce shareable walkthroughs for customer support, sales enablement, and internal education.

These guides can be embedded on websites or in knowledge bases. The process removes the need for video production or code.

Supademo's Main Features

• Offers multi-mode recording, including HTML front-end cloning, screenshot capture, and full video recording.
• Uses AI to generate synthetic voiceovers, create automatic text annotations, and translate demos into more than 15 languages.
• Includes an editor with chapters, conditional branching, and dynamic variables for personalization.
• Allows users to share demos through public links or in-app tours and export them as MP4 or GIF files.

How Supademo Compares To Walnut

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 362 G2 reviews.

• Supademo offers multiple recording options, such as HTML, screenshots, and video. This gives more creation flexibility compared to Walnut's front-end capture approach.
• The platform uses AI to create text annotations and voiceovers automatically. This differs from Walnut, which requires manual content creation for its demos.
• It allows users to export demos as MP4 or GIF files for wider distribution. This provides more sharing options than Walnut's standard interactive tour format.
• This tool includes conditional branching to build personalized paths within a single demo. This offers a more dynamic user journey than the guided tours typically found in Walnut.

Where Supademo Compares Less Favorably

• Some users note that Supademo's recording function can occasionally miss certain on-screen elements. This is different from Walnut, whose capture technology is built to create a high-fidelity replica, often resulting in a more complete capture.
• The platform may lack some of the advanced enterprise-level security and governance features that are available in Walnut. This can make Walnut a more fitting choice for large organizations that have strict compliance needs.
• While it offers a free plan, Supademo's paid plans for teams can have a higher per-user cost than Walnut's entry-level package. Walnut's annual plan provides a lower per-seat price, which is often more budget-friendly for small teams.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Supademo provides a free plan, an option Walnut does not have. For paid plans, Walnut's entry-level package at $750 per year can be more budget-friendly for small teams, as it offers a lower per-seat cost compared to Supademo's team plans.

Supademo provides a free plan and a monthly Pro option at $27 for one user. Walnut's entry-level Ignite plan costs $750 per year for three seats, offering a lower per-seat price for small teams. For larger teams, Supademo's Growth plan is $350 per month for five creators.

8) TestBox

TestBox is a platform for software buyers, not demo creators. It provides live, private sandbox environments to test products. Teams can compare software side-by-side and collaborate on the evaluation. The platform also connects buyers directly with vendors for questions.

Its main use is for hands-on product evaluation before a purchase. This process helps teams make informed decisions and centralizes software procurement in one place.

TestBox's Main Features

• Provides live, private sandbox environments for prospects to test products hands-on before purchase.
• Ingests AI-generated data directly into live product instances to demonstrate advanced features and workflows.
• Allows teams to compare different software solutions side-by-side within the platform.
• Connects software buyers directly with vendors to ask questions during the evaluation process.

How TestBox Compares To Walnut

Average Review score: 4.8/5 stars based on 100 G2 reviews.

• TestBox provides live, private sandbox environments that give prospects an authentic product experience, a different approach from Walnut's screen-capture method.
• It ingests AI-generated data directly into live product instances, a process that differs from the manual data entry often required in Walnut.
• The platform offers scalable proof-of-concept (POC) environments for a hands-on evaluation, an approach that contrasts with the structured path of a Walnut demo.
• This tool allows software buyers to compare different products side-by-side, a function that serves a different purpose than Walnut's focus on single-product demos.

Where TestBox Compares Less Favorably To Walnut

• TestBox does not provide a no-code editor for creating guided tours. This is different from Walnut, which allows teams to make detailed visual changes to captured screens without needing technical skills.
• Some users find that managing different demo environments can be complex. Walnut, in comparison, offers a centralized library that simplifies the organization and sharing of a large volume of pre-built demos.
• The platform's reliance on live product instances can sometimes lead to slower performance. This is a different experience from Walnut, whose screen-captured demos are lightweight and generally load more quickly for the end-user.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

TestBox does not publicly list its pricing, so a direct comparison to Walnut's entry-level plan of $750 per year is not possible. For the most accurate pricing, we recommend visiting TestBox's official website.

9) Demoboost

Demoboost is a demo creation platform for B2B SaaS companies. It provides go-to-market teams a stable, cloned environment to build interactive product demos without engineering support.

Use cases include live sales calls, website tours, and materials for follow-up. Teams can customize content for specific accounts to show relevant product functions in a controlled space.

Demoboost's Main Features

• It creates demos in various formats, including tours, videos, sandboxes, overlays, and mobile versions.
• The platform provides a library to store, reuse, and personalize demos for different use cases and customers.
• It translates demos into multiple languages to support global sales and marketing efforts.
• The tool tracks demo performance to provide insights for making informed decisions.

How Demoboost Compares To Walnut

Average Review score: 4.9/5 stars based on 95 G2 reviews.

• Demoboost creates demos in various formats, including videos, sandboxes, and mobile versions. This provides more options than Walnut, which focuses on interactive product tours.
• It supports demo translation into multiple languages. This feature helps teams with global sales efforts, offering a different capability from Walnut's standard setup.
• The platform provides live overlays for real-time presentations. This allows for on-the-fly adjustments during a live call, a different approach from Walnut's pre-built demos.
• This tool allows the creation of demos specifically for mobile devices. This is a distinct feature compared to Walnut, which primarily builds demos from desktop screen captures.

Where Demoboost Compares Less Favorably

• Some users find that organizing a large number of demos in Demoboost can be challenging. In comparison, Walnut provides a centralized library that often makes it simpler for teams to manage and access their content.
• The platform sometimes experiences slow performance or minor software bugs during demo creation. This is different from Walnut, which users often find to have a more stable and responsive editor for making detailed changes.
• The implementation time for Demoboost can take around a month. This is a longer setup period compared to Walnut, which is often noted for a quicker onboarding process that allows teams to start creating demos faster.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Demoboost does not publicly list its pricing, so a direct comparison to Walnut's entry-level plan of $750 per year is not possible. For the most accurate pricing, we recommend visiting Demoboost's official website.

10) Arcade

Arcade is a platform for interactive product demos. It uses a Chrome extension to capture product flows and build demos without code. Use cases include marketing content for websites, sales outreach, customer support, and internal updates on new features.

Arcade's Main Features

• Uses generative AI to create high-quality voice-overs and automatic text for demos.
• Offers automatic translation of demo content for global audiences.
• Provides analytics on prospect engagement and integrates with CRM platforms.

How Arcade Compares To Walnut

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 95 G2 reviews.

• Arcade uses generative AI to create voice-overs and automatic text for demos. This provides a different level of automation compared to Walnut, where users create content manually.
• It offers automatic translation of demo content for global audiences. This feature supports international campaigns in a way that is different from Walnut's standard setup.
• The tool focuses on rapid demo creation, which allows users to publish in minutes. This offers a faster workflow than the more detailed editing process often associated with Walnut.
• This platform provides analytics on prospect engagement that integrates directly with CRM platforms. This offers a different way to connect demo data to sales workflows compared to Walnut's system.

Where Arcade Compares Less Favorably To Walnut

• Some users report that detailed visual edits in Arcade take more time. In comparison, Walnut provides a robust editor for more granular control over every element on a captured screen.
• The platform has a cap on the number of demo collections, which can limit organization for large teams. Walnut, in contrast, offers a centralized library system to manage an extensive volume of demos.
• Arcade may lack some of the advanced security and governance features that large organizations require. This differs from Walnut, which provides enterprise-grade options for companies with strict compliance needs.
• Its demo creation tool works only as a Chrome extension. This can be a limitation for teams that use other browsers, a restriction not typically associated with Walnut's platform.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Arcade provides a free plan for one user and a monthly Pro plan at $32, options that Walnut does not offer. Walnut's entry-level Ignite plan is $750 per year for three seats. This makes Arcade more accessible for individuals, while Walnut's annual plan provides a lower per-seat cost for small teams.

Which One Should You Go With?

Choosing the right Walnut alternative depends on your team's specific needs, budget, and use cases. This guide has outlined several options to help you create a shortlist and make an informed decision.

If your goal is to automate sales functions, 11x offers a different approach with its digital workers. This can free up your sales team to focus on closing deals instead of handling repetitive tasks like outreach and lead qualification.