Consensus Alternatives

Consensus is a popular tool for good reason. It performs well for creating interactive product demos and is a solid choice for sales enablement. Many teams use it to automate parts of their sales process and find it effective for those specific tasks.

However, some users report that it can be complex to set up, and the pricing might not suit every budget. We've identified the best alternatives and analyzed their pros and cons to help you choose. Let's get started.

Consider 11x for Sales Automation

For teams that want to use digital workers in their sales process, 11x provides a specific option. The tool automates certain sales functions so your staff can handle more complex work.

11x is a GTM platform that uses AI agents to manage the sales process. One agent, Alice, finds prospects, handles outreach on email and LinkedIn, and updates the CRM. Another agent, Julian, qualifies inbound leads and books meetings.

This approach consolidates tools for data enrichment, outreach, and email warmup into a single platform.

Consensus Alternatives

Here is a detailed breakdown of the top Consensus alternatives. We analyze each tool's main features, pricing, and specific pros and cons to help you find the right fit for your team.

1) Reprise

Reprise is an enterprise demo creation platform for presales, sales, and marketing teams. It uses AI to configure, populate, and maintain interactive demo environments to help build and scale product demonstrations. The platform aims to shorten sales cycles and drive revenue.

Common uses include live sales calls, personalized demos, interactive website tours, and sales leave-behinds. It also supports sandbox environments for prospects and can replace proof-of-concept cycles.

Reprise's Main Features

• Auto-configures, populates, and maintains demo environments using AI-generated custom data sets for specific storytelling.
• Supports three demo modes: guided tours, live app overlays, and full application clones.
• Allows editing down to the code level and injects data via a Data Studio for full customization.
• Hosts the entire demo environment and includes a demo library to organize, reuse, and govern demos across the organization.

How Reprise Compares To Consensus

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 162 G2 reviews.

• Reprise uses generative AI to populate demo environments with custom data, which allows for more specific storytelling compared to the interactive video format of Consensus.
• It provides deeper customization by capturing an application at the code level. This is different from Consensus, where users add interactive layers on top of screen recordings.
• The tool offers three distinct demo modes: guided tours, live app overlays, and full application clones, providing more flexibility than the single demo format in Consensus.
• Reprise supports live, fully interactive sandbox environments for prospects. This offers a hands-on experience that differs from the pre-recorded nature of Consensus demos.

Reprise's Drawbacks Compared To Consensus

• Some users find its analytics provide less detail on individual viewer engagement compared to the granular tracking available in Consensus video demos.
• The platform's setup can be complex because it captures an application at the code level; this might require more technical resources than the process for interactive videos in Consensus.
• It does not focus on the interactive video format that Consensus specializes in, which can be a limitation for teams that prefer a workflow based on screen recordings.
• Management of a large demo library can sometimes become challenging, whereas Consensus offers specific features designed for organizing and sharing its video assets.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Reprise does not make its pricing public, but user reviews indicate it is a premium-priced tool. For exact pricing, you will need to contact the Reprise sales team directly.

2) Walnut

Walnut is an interactive demo platform that provides a hands-on product experience. Revenue teams use it to create, personalize, and share product demos. The solution also offers interactive deal rooms that bundle demos, documents, and mutual action plans into a single destination for buyers.

Common use cases include website product tours for marketing, personalized demo libraries for presales, and buyer-specific demos for sales teams. It also supports interactive walkthroughs for customer onboarding.

Walnut's Main Features

• Creates interactive deal rooms that bundle demos, documents, and mutual action plans into a single destination.
• Uses AI to assist with the automation of demo building and personalization.
• Offers a product content hub to manage all demo assets and complementary product content in one place.
• Provides native connectors for Gmail, HubSpot, Salesforce, Marketo, and Slack to integrate into existing workflows.

How Walnut Compares To Consensus

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 104 G2 reviews.

• Walnut provides interactive deal rooms that bundle demos with documents and mutual action plans. This creates a single destination for buyers, which differs from the demo-centric approach of Consensus.
• The tool captures an application's front-end to create demos without code. This method allows for direct editing, which is different from Consensus where users add layers to screen recordings.
• It includes a product content hub to manage all demo assets and related sales materials in one place. This offers a more centralized system for content than the video asset organization in Consensus.
• The platform provides an offline mode for demos. This feature allows sales teams to present without an internet connection, a capability not typically available with Consensus.

Walnut's Drawbacks Compared To Consensus

• Walnut lacks the specialized 'demolytics' engine of Consensus. This means teams might receive less insight into how prospects interact with and share video-based demo content.
• Some users report screen-capture glitches or UI lag during edits. This can interrupt the workflow, unlike the Consensus method that applies layers over a stable video recording.
• The platform's mobile demo functionality is sometimes limited. Interactive demos may not perform well on mobile devices, while Consensus video demos are typically more accessible on phones.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Walnut offers plans starting at $750.02 per year, while Consensus does not publicly list its pricing, making a direct comparison difficult. For the most accurate information, check the detailed pricing on Walnut's official website.

3) Navattic

Navattic is an interactive product-demo platform for go-to-market teams. It lets teams embed no-code, clickable demos across the buyer journey. The tool captures engagement signals to reveal prospect intent. Companies that use the tool report 20-25% lifts in website conversion rates.

Common uses include website lead capture, sales leave-behinds for prospects to review, and offline demos for events.

Navattic's Main Features

• Builds and hosts interactive product tours without requiring engineering help.
• Routes visitors to demos tailored to their specific choices.
• Inserts dynamic variables to personalize content for each prospect.
• Offers pre-built playbooks that surface buyer activity through alerts and account tracking.

How Navattic Compares To Consensus

Average Review score: 4.8/5 stars based on 448 G2 reviews.

• Navattic captures the front-end of an application to create demos. This approach differs from Consensus, which adds interactive layers on top of video recordings.
• The tool lets you embed clickable product tours on a website to capture leads. This is a different focus from the video demos that Consensus provides for sales enablement.
• It uses dynamic variables to personalize content for each prospect. This creates more tailored demo paths compared to the more linear format of a Consensus video.
• The platform offers pre-built playbooks that send alerts based on buyer activity. This provides different engagement signals than the video-sharing analytics found in Consensus.

Navattic's Drawbacks Compared To Consensus

• Some users find that Navattic offers less detail on how prospects share demos. This is in contrast to Consensus, which provides specialized analytics on how content is distributed among a buying committee.
• The tool does not specialize in the interactive video format. Teams that prefer a workflow based on screen recordings might find Consensus a more direct fit for their process.
• Its features for managing a large demo library are sometimes less robust. Consensus, in contrast, provides specific tools designed to organize and govern a large collection of video assets across a company.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Navattic provides transparent pricing with a free starter plan, a base plan at $500 per month, and a growth plan at $1,000 per month. In contrast, Consensus does not publicly list its pricing, which suggests a custom, enterprise-focused model. For the most current details, see Navattic's official website.

4) Demostack

Demostack is a platform for product demos that serves revenue teams. It helps create interactive demonstrations for sales enablement and other go-to-market efforts. Companies use the tool to show software to prospects with a controlled, hands-on product experience.

Demostack's Main Features

• Captures and edits product screens to create demos without engineering help.
• Provides three demo formats: clickable product tours, live demos, and customizable sandboxes.
• Offers analytics to supply data for continuous demo optimization.
• Includes enterprise capabilities such as a scalable architecture and SOC 2 Type I & II compliance.

How Demostack Compares To Consensus

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 72 G2 reviews.

• Demostack captures a full replica of an application's front-end, which results in a more realistic demo than the interactive video format in Consensus.
• The platform offers three distinct demo formats, including live demos and sandboxes, which provides more options than the single interactive video format of Consensus.
• It allows users to edit the captured product screens directly, offering a different customization experience from adding layers to a video recording in Consensus.
• The tool sends real-time alerts when prospects interact with a demo sandbox, offering immediate engagement signals that differ from the video-sharing analytics in Consensus.

Demostack's Drawbacks Compared To Consensus

• Demostack provides fewer insights on how prospects share demos compared to Consensus. This makes it harder to track content distribution within a buying committee, a key feature of the Consensus platform.
• Some users report that product updates require rebuilding demos from scratch. This process can be more time-consuming than updating the interactive video layers in Consensus.
• The platform's workflow centers on capturing an application's front-end, not on creating interactive videos. Teams with a process built around screen recordings may find the Consensus approach more direct.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Demostack does not publicly list its pricing, which is similar to the custom pricing model of Consensus. For the most accurate information, check for details on Demostack's official website or contact their sales team.

5) Storylane

Storylane is a platform for interactive demos that helps GTM teams showcase software. It allows the creation of guided product tours for sales enablement. This gives prospects a self-serve product experience, which helps sales teams qualify leads and shorten sales cycles.

Storylane's Main Features

• Provides a buyer hub to centralize every asset a buyer needs in one deal room.
• Uses AI to auto-generate walkthrough text, voice-overs, and video avatars for demos.
• Captures live product screens with a browser extension and allows edits in an HTML editor.
• Tracks engagement, de-anonymizes website visitors, and syncs data back to a CRM.

How Storylane Compares To Consensus

Average Review score: 4.8/5 stars based on 771 G2 reviews.

• Storylane uses AI to generate walkthrough text and video avatars for demos. This offers a different type of automation than Consensus, where users add interactive elements to screen recordings.
• The platform provides a buyer hub to put all necessary assets for a deal in one shared space. This creates a more comprehensive resource for prospects compared to the video-centric library in Consensus.
• It captures product screens and allows for direct edits in an HTML editor. This method provides more detailed control over the demo's appearance than the overlay approach used in Consensus.
• The tool can identify anonymous website visitors who engage with a demo. This provides a different kind of lead intelligence from the analytics in Consensus, which track how known contacts share videos.

Storylane's Drawbacks Compared To Consensus

• Storylane provides less insight on how prospects share demos. This is different from Consensus, which has specialized analytics to track content distribution within a buying committee.
• The tool's workflow captures product screens instead of creating interactive videos. This can be a limitation for teams that prefer the screen recording and overlay process in Consensus.
• The management of a large demo library can sometimes become difficult, according to some users. In comparison, Consensus offers specific features to organize and govern a large collection of video assets.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Storylane offers transparent pricing with a Starter plan at $50 per month and a Growth plan at $625 per month. In contrast, Consensus does not publicly list its pricing, indicating a custom model geared toward enterprise clients. This makes Storylane a more accessible option for teams that need predictable costs.

Our Recommendation for Sales Automation

For teams interested in digital workers for their sales process, 11x is a relevant option. The platform provides AI agents to handle prospect outreach and lead qualification. This approach lets your sales staff focus on more complex tasks and build relationships.

With 11x, AI agents manage your sales process. Alice finds prospects and handles outreach, while Julian qualifies leads and books meetings. The platform consolidates tools for data, outreach, and email warmup to remove the need for extra software or staff.

Book a demo to see the platform in action.

6) Tourial

Tourial is a platform that lets GTM teams create interactive product demos. It focuses on guided product tours that give prospects a self-serve way to experience software. This approach supports sales enablement and helps teams qualify leads without a live call.

Tourial's Main Features

• Creates centralized "Tour Centers" where visitors can browse collections of tours tailored to their persona, use case, or industry.
• Automates the generation of tour copy and structure to speed up the creation process using AI.
• Records product screens, workflows, and click-paths with a Chrome extension to quickly create demo sequences.
• Tracks engagement by revealing what prospects click on, which steps they skip, and how long they stay to enable data-driven optimization.

How Tourial Compares To Consensus

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 83 G2 reviews.

• Tourial provides centralized "Tour Centers" that organize demos by persona or use case. This creates a more structured content hub for prospects than the video library in Consensus.
• The platform uses AI to automatically generate tour copy and structure. This approach to creation is different from the manual process of adding interactive video overlays in Consensus.
• It captures product screens and click-paths with a browser extension to build demo sequences. This workflow differs from Consensus, which requires users to add interactive layers to a completed screen recording.
• The tool's analytics show what prospects click and which steps they skip. This offers a different type of engagement data than the analytics in Consensus, which track how demos are shared.

Tourial's Drawbacks Compared To Consensus

• Tourial provides less insight on how prospects share demos. This is different from Consensus, which has specialized analytics to track content distribution within a buying committee, helping to map out stakeholder engagement.
• The platform does not focus on the interactive video format. Teams with a workflow built around screen recordings may find the Consensus process of adding layers to videos a more direct fit for their needs.
• Some users report that managing a large library of tours can become challenging. In comparison, Consensus offers specific features to organize and govern a large collection of video assets, which can be helpful for larger teams.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Tourial does not publicly list its pricing, which is similar to the custom pricing model of Consensus. For the most accurate information, check for details on Tourial's official website or contact their sales team.

7) Demoboost

Demoboost is an interactive demo platform for B2B revenue teams. It helps create and share personalized demonstrations for sales enablement. Companies use the tool to build a library of custom demos for live calls and as leave-behinds for prospects.

Demoboost's Main Features

• Provides multiple demo-creation formats, including interactive tours, sandbox environments, and live demo overlays.
• Distributes demos through digital sales rooms and playlists with "choose your own journey" branching logic.
• Allows for advanced UI simulations within demos, such as dynamic calculators, maps, and chatbots.
• Includes an ROI calculator and over 20 native integrations with platforms like Salesforce, HubSpot, and Slack.

How Demoboost Compares To Consensus

Average Review score: 4.9/5 stars based on 95 G2 reviews.

• Demoboost provides more demo formats, including sandboxes and mobile demos, which offers more flexibility than the interactive video focus of Consensus.
• It allows for demo distribution through digital sales rooms with branching logic, creating a more guided path for prospects compared to the video library in Consensus.
• The tool supports advanced UI simulations like dynamic calculators and chatbots within a demo, which provides a more interactive experience than the video overlays in Consensus.
• Demoboost includes a feature to translate demos into multiple languages, a specific capability for global sales teams not highlighted in Consensus.

Demoboost's Drawbacks Compared To Consensus

• Demoboost provides fewer details on how prospects share demos. This is different from Consensus, which offers specialized analytics to track how content moves through a buying committee.
• Its workflow is based on capturing an application's front-end, not on creating interactive videos. Teams that have a process built around screen recordings may find the Consensus approach more direct.
• Some users say that managing a large demo library can be a challenge. In comparison, Consensus provides specific tools to organize and govern a large number of video assets for an enterprise.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Demoboost and Consensus both use custom pricing models and do not list prices publicly. For the most accurate information, check for details on Demoboost's official website or contact their sales team.

8) Arcade

Arcade is a platform for interactive product demos. Go-to-market teams use it to build and share software demonstrations. The tool creates product tours that combine video with interactive hotspots and tooltips. This method shows product features to prospects and customers.

Common applications are website tours, sales enablement content, and guides for new users. A team can embed the demos on a website or share them with a link.

Arcade's Main Features

• Creates product tours by combining video with interactive hotspots and tooltips.
• Uses generative AI to produce high-quality voice-overs for demonstrations.
• Enables rapid demo creation and publishing, with a median time of six minutes.
• Includes custom branding options to align demos with a company's visual identity.

How Arcade Compares To Consensus

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 95 G2 reviews.

• Arcade creates product tours by combining video with interactive hotspots and tooltips. This hybrid approach differs from the interactive video format used in Consensus.
• It uses generative AI to produce high-quality voice-overs for demonstrations, offering a specific type of automation for audio narration not highlighted in Consensus.
• The tool allows for very fast demo creation, with a median publish time of six minutes. This focus on speed is different from the more detailed layering process in Consensus.
• Custom branding options allow demos to align with a company's visual identity. This provides a different level of aesthetic control compared to the standard interface of Consensus demos.

Arcade’s Limitations Compared To Consensus

• Arcade provides fewer insights into how demos are shared within a buying committee. This is different from Consensus, which offers specialized analytics to track how content is distributed among stakeholders.
• Some users report that managing a large library of demos can become a challenge. In contrast, Consensus provides specific features designed to organize and govern a large collection of video assets for an enterprise.
• The tool’s demo creation is sometimes limited to the Chrome browser. This can be a constraint for teams that use other browsers, while Consensus video demos are typically accessible across different web environments.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Arcade provides transparent pricing with a free plan and paid tiers starting at $32 per user, per month. In contrast, Consensus does not publicly list its pricing, which suggests a custom, enterprise-focused model. This makes Arcade a more accessible option for teams that need predictable, per-seat costs.

9) Vidyard

Vidyard is a video platform for businesses to create and manage video content. It supports sales and marketing teams with tools for virtual sales and digital campaigns. The platform allows users to host videos and track viewer engagement through analytics.

Common uses include personalized sales outreach, video messages for customer support, and internal corporate communications.

Vidyard's Main Features

• Automates personalized video responses to pre-defined customer actions like downloading an asset or booking a demo.
• Records and shares personalized videos that address the unique needs of each buyer.
• Automates the creation and delivery of personalized videos at scale.
• Tracks video views, engagement, and drop-off rates to understand how the audience interacts with the content.

How Vidyard Compares To Consensus

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 808 G2 reviews.

• Vidyard automates personalized video responses based on customer actions, like when a customer downloads an asset. This is different from Consensus, which focuses on creating interactive demos for sales enablement.
• The platform allows for the creation and delivery of personalized videos at scale. This approach is more focused on individual outreach compared to the shareable, interactive demo format of Consensus.
• Its analytics track individual viewer engagement, such as views and drop-off rates. This provides a different type of insight than the analytics in Consensus, which focus on how content is shared among stakeholders.
• The tool functions as a broader video platform for sales that provides hosting and personalized outreach tools. This is a wider scope than Consensus, which specializes in the creation of interactive product demos.

Vidyard's Limitations Compared To Consensus

• Vidyard does not specialize in creating interactive product demos. Its platform focuses on personalized video messaging, unlike Consensus, which builds demos by adding interactive layers to screen recordings.
• The platform offers less insight into how content is shared within a buying committee. Consensus, in contrast, provides specialized analytics to map how different stakeholders distribute and engage with a demo.
• Some users may find the platform less suited for building complex, reusable product tours. The tool is designed for one-to-one video messages, while Consensus is built to create detailed, interactive product demonstrations.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Vidyard offers transparent pricing with a free plan and a starter tier at $59 per user per month. In contrast, Consensus does not publicly list its pricing, indicating a custom model. This makes Vidyard a more accessible option for teams that need predictable, per-seat costs.

10) Showpad

Showpad is a sales enablement platform for revenue teams. It combines content management with tools for seller instruction and buyer engagement. The platform equips sellers with relevant materials and provides a central hub for all sales assets.

Teams use the system to organize content, prepare sellers for conversations, and interact with buyers. It also provides data on content use and buyer activity to align sales and marketing.

Showpad's Main Features

• Combines sales content management, training, and coaching into a single user experience.
• Includes a coaching engine for seller onboarding, training, and data-driven coaching.
• Supports live presentations and screensharing for direct buyer interaction.
• Provides analytics and reporting on content usage to guide investment decisions.

How Showpad Compares To Consensus

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 1,895 G2 reviews.

• Showpad includes a sales coaching and training module to develop seller skills. This provides a broader enablement function compared to Consensus, which focuses on creating interactive product demos.
• It combines content management, training, and buyer engagement in one platform. This creates a single source for sales teams, while Consensus specializes in the demo creation and sharing part of the sales cycle.
• The tool supports live presentations and screensharing for direct buyer interaction. This offers a different engagement model from the asynchronous, pre-recorded video demos that Consensus provides.
• Showpad provides analytics on overall content usage to help guide marketing investment. This is different from the analytics in Consensus, which focus specifically on how individual demos are shared within a buying committee.

Showpad's Limitations Compared To Consensus

• Showpad does not specialize in creating interactive product demos. Its platform focuses on broader sales enablement, while Consensus is built specifically to add interactive layers to screen recordings for detailed product tours.
• The platform offers less insight into how content is shared within a buying committee. Consensus, in contrast, provides specialized analytics to track how different stakeholders distribute and engage with a demo.
• Some users find that building complex, reusable product tours can be a challenge. The platform's main purpose is content management and coaching, while Consensus is designed specifically for creating detailed, shareable product demonstrations.

Budget and Pricing Considerations

Showpad and Consensus both use custom pricing models and do not list prices publicly. For the most accurate information, check for details on Showpad's official website or contact their sales team.

Which One Should You Go With?

Choosing the right Consensus alternative depends on many variables, including your team's specific needs and budget. This guide analyzed several top options to provide the information needed to make an informed decision for your GTM strategy.

For teams focused on sales automation, 11x offers a different approach by using AI agents to handle outreach and lead qualification. This allows your sales team to focus on closing deals and building relationships instead of repetitive tasks.