Floworks Alternatives

You might be using Floworks for its strong sales automation. The tool performs well with hyper-personalizing emails and generating leads. Users often praise its ability to automate the entire cold email outbound process, which saves sales teams a lot of time.

However, some users report drawbacks like difficult navigation, a learning curve, and slow loading. This might lead you to look for other options. We've analyzed the best alternatives to help you find a better fit. Let's get started.

Consider 11x for Your Sales Efforts

If your team needs digital workers for sales tasks, consider 11x. It provides autonomous agents that manage parts of your sales process. You can see how it works for your specific needs.

11x is a GTM platform where AI agents manage your sales process. The agent, Alice, finds prospects, runs outreach on email and LinkedIn, and updates your CRM.

Another agent, Julian, qualifies inbound leads and books meetings. The platform combines data enrichment, outreach, and email warmup, so you do not need separate tools.

Floworks Alternatives

Below, we review several Floworks alternatives in detail. Each review covers pricing, main features, and how each tool compares to Floworks regarding its advantages and potential drawbacks.

1) Zapier

Zapier is an AI orchestration platform that connects over 300 AI tools with nearly 8,000 SaaS apps. It lets you build AI automations without code. For sales teams, this means you can automate lead capture, research, and qualification.

The platform also syncs data between CRMs and other databases, which helps with sales operations and pipeline handoffs. It provides a central place for AI workflows and agents.

Zapier's Main Features

• Builds visual, multi-step automations with logic branches and built-in AI processing.
• Creates custom autonomous agents that work across your entire app stack.
• Develops no-code chatbots to solve customer problems and answer frequently asked questions.
• Provides an AI-assisted planning space that turns ideas into automated systems.

How Zapier Compares to Floworks

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 1,368 G2 reviews.

• Zapier provides connections to nearly 8,000 SaaS apps. This is a significant difference from Floworks, which focuses on a specific set of sales automation tasks.
• It automates tasks across different departments like marketing and customer support, whereas Floworks primarily concentrates on sales process automation.
• The platform offers a visual editor to build custom automations without code. This provides more flexibility than the pre-defined agent functions available in Floworks.
• You can develop custom autonomous agents that operate across your app stack. This is different from Floworks, which offers specific, pre-built agents for sales tasks.

Where Zapier Falls Short Compared to Floworks

• Zapier offers general automation, so it does not have the deep sales focus of Floworks. It lacks built-in tools for hyper-personalized email campaigns, a core feature of Floworks.
• Some users find that creating advanced sales workflows in Zapier has a steep learning curve. Floworks, with its focus on specific sales tasks, can be more straightforward to set up for its intended purpose.
• The tool's pricing depends on the number of tasks you run. High-volume sales outreach can lead to high costs, which is a factor to consider when comparing it to a specialized tool like Floworks.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

User reviews indicate Floworks is priced slightly above $200 per month. Zapier offers more flexibility with a free plan and paid tiers starting at $19.99, making it a more scalable option for varied automation needs compared to Floworks' specialized focus.

2) Make

Make is a visual platform to build and automate workflows with AI. It provides a drag-and-drop interface for no-code development. The platform connects with over 2,500 apps and 400 AI tools. For sales, it automates lead capture and CRM updates. It has a free plan and an enterprise option with advanced security features and support.

Make's Main Features

• Designs and deploys automations with a visual drag-and-drop builder.
• Provides a spreadsheet-style view called Make Grid to monitor the automation landscape.
• Allows multiple team members to co-design and iterate on workflows visually.
• Offers a library of over 10,000 workflow templates to start automations.

How Make Compares to Floworks

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 241 G2 reviews.

• Make uses a visual drag-and-drop builder to create custom workflows. This provides more design freedom than the pre-built sales agents available in Floworks.
• It connects with over 2,500 applications, which offers broader integration possibilities across departments compared to Floworks' specific focus on sales tools.
• The platform includes a library of over 10,000 templates to help start automations. This is different from Floworks, which focuses on configuring its agents for set tasks.
• Make Grid provides a spreadsheet-like view to monitor the entire automation landscape. This offers a centralized overview that differs from managing individual agent performance in Floworks.

Where Make Falls Short Compared to Floworks

• Make provides general automation, so it does not have the deep sales focus of Floworks. It lacks native tools for hyper-personalized email campaigns, which is a core function in Floworks.
• Some users may find that building complex sales automations from scratch requires more technical skill. This is different from Floworks, which offers pre-built agents for specific sales tasks.
• The tool's pricing is based on the number of operations. High-volume sales outreach might lead to higher costs, a factor to consider when comparing it to a specialized platform like Floworks.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

User reviews indicate Floworks is priced slightly above $200 per month. Make offers greater pricing flexibility with a free plan and paid tiers starting at $9 per month, making it a more scalable and cost-effective option for varied automation needs. Check the detailed pricing of Make on Make's official website.

3) Workato

Workato is an enterprise automation platform that combines AI agents, search, and integration features. It connects data and applications so teams can build automations without extensive code.

For sales, it handles tasks like quote-to-cash, lead capture and distribution, and CRM hygiene. The platform also supports product-led sales automation and account-based marketing orchestration.

Workato's Main Features

• Builds custom agents in Agent Studio and provides enterprise search across all connected apps and data.
• Manages the full API lifecycle from design to monitoring and supports B2B/EDI integrations.
• Provides pre-built, white-labeled integrations for SaaS vendors to embed in their products.
• Offers out-of-the-box recipes for processes like procure-to-pay, ticket escalation, and threat detection.

How Workato Compares to Floworks

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 566 G2 reviews.

• Workato is an enterprise platform that automates broad business processes like quote-to-cash. This differs from Floworks, which focuses specifically on sales automation tasks like email outreach.
• It provides over 1,200 pre-built connectors and full API lifecycle management. This offers more extensive integration capabilities than Floworks' more targeted connections for sales tools.
• The platform includes an Agent Studio to build custom agents for various tasks. This is a different approach from Floworks, which provides pre-configured agents for lead generation and qualification.
• Workato offers pre-built automation templates, called recipes, for processes across different departments. Floworks, in contrast, automates a specific set of sales functions without such templates.

Where Workato Falls Short Compared to Floworks

• Workato is a general automation platform, so it lacks the deep sales focus of Floworks. It does not have native tools for hyper-personalized email campaigns, a core function of Floworks.
• Some users may find building specific sales workflows on the platform to be complex. Floworks, in contrast, provides pre-configured agents for tasks like outreach, which can be faster to deploy.
• The platform does not include specialized sales features like a built-in email warmup tool. Users who need this function must connect a separate service, unlike Floworks where it is part of the platform.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

While we've covered key features and use cases in this comparison, pricing models can vary significantly between tools. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Workato's official website.

4) Tray.io

Tray.io is an automation platform to connect applications and services. Teams can build custom workflows to automate processes. For sales operations, the platform handles tasks like lead distribution and data sync between different tools. This helps maintain data consistency across the sales technology stack.

Tray.io's Main Features

• Builds generative-AI agents with a low-code builder that retains memory and context across conversations.
• Provides pre-built templates called Agent Accelerators for tasks like ITSM, knowledge management, and customer support.
• Offers a low-code visual builder with over 600 connectors and an AI Palette for prototyping new capabilities.
• Includes Merlin Guardian to safeguard personally identifiable information and other sensitive data within AI workflows.

How Tray.io Compares to Floworks

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 156 G2 reviews.

• Tray.io lets you build generative-AI agents that retain context. This differs from Floworks, which provides pre-built agents for specific sales tasks.
• The platform offers a low-code visual builder with over 600 connectors. This provides broader integration options than Floworks' focus on sales tools.
• It includes pre-built templates called Agent Accelerators for various business functions. Floworks, in contrast, automates a specific set of sales functions without such templates.
• A feature called Merlin Guardian helps protect sensitive data within AI workflows. This offers a specific security function not highlighted in Floworks.

Where Tray.io Falls Short Compared to Floworks

• Tray.io does not provide built-in sales tools like email warmup. A sales team must connect a separate service for this function, which is different from Floworks where it is part of the platform.
• The platform's focus on custom workflows can be a drawback for some sales teams. It may require more setup time to build automations compared to the pre-configured sales agents available in Floworks.
• This tool does not have a native function to find new prospects. It automates processes between your current apps, unlike Floworks, which includes an agent specifically for lead generation.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

While we've covered key features and use cases in this comparison, pricing models can vary significantly between tools. For the most accurate and up-to-date pricing information, we recommend visiting Tray.io's official website.

5) n8n

n8n is a source-available workflow automation tool. It allows you to connect different applications and build custom automations. A key aspect is the option to self-host, which gives you full control over your data and infrastructure. It is designed for technical users to create complex workflows.

n8n's Main Features

• Provides a node-based visual editor to map out and build complex workflows.
• Offers a self-hosting option for complete data control and privacy.
• Connects to hundreds of apps and services with pre-built and community nodes.
• Allows for custom code execution within workflows for advanced logic and data manipulation.

How n8n Compares to Floworks

• n8n can be self-hosted, giving you control over data and infrastructure. This is a fundamental difference from the SaaS model of Floworks.
• It is a general-purpose automation platform, not specialized for sales. This contrasts with Floworks' focus on sales outreach and lead generation tasks.
• The node-based workflow builder offers deep customization. This is different from using the pre-configured sales agents provided by Floworks.
• Its source-available model allows for code-level modifications, offering a level of extensibility not available in Floworks.

Where n8n Falls Short Compared to Floworks

• The self-hosting option requires technical expertise and resources for setup and maintenance. Floworks, as a SaaS platform, handles all infrastructure management.
• It lacks the built-in, sales-specific features of Floworks, such as hyper-personalized email generation or automated lead finding.
• Sales teams must build their own outreach sequences and logic from scratch. This can require more development time compared to Floworks' ready-to-use agents.
• The platform is geared more toward technical users. Non-technical sales team members might find the learning curve steep compared to Floworks.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

n8n offers a free, self-hosted version where costs are tied to your own infrastructure. It also provides paid cloud plans for a managed service. This flexible model differs from Floworks' subscription, offering a potentially lower-cost entry point for teams with technical resources.

n8n is a source-available tool for workflow automation. It connects applications so you can build custom processes. The platform offers a self-host option for complete data control. It is a fit for technical users who construct complex workflows.

For sales teams, this means you must build outreach sequences yourself. The tool does not have native functions for sales, like an automatic search for new prospects.

n8n's Main Features

• Offers a self-hosting option to run air-gapped or deploy via Docker for full data control.
• Combines a visual builder with code nodes for JavaScript and Python, and supports raw cURL requests.
• Includes fine-grained debugging tools to re-run single steps, replay data, and view inline logs.
• Provides enterprise options including Git-based versioning, SSO/SAML, and advanced role-based access control (RBAC).

How n8n Compares to Floworks

Average Review score: 4.8/5 stars based on 92 G2 reviews.

• n8n provides a self-hosting option for complete data control, which is different from the SaaS model of Floworks.
• It offers a node-based editor and supports custom code, which allows for more complex workflow designs compared to the pre-configured agents in Floworks.
• The platform's source-available model permits code-level changes for deep customization, an option not available in the closed Floworks platform.
• This tool connects with over 400 apps for general business automation, whereas Floworks focuses on a specific set of sales tools and functions.

Where n8n Falls Short Compared to Floworks

• n8n does not have a native function to find new prospects. Sales teams must build this process themselves, which is different from Floworks' specific agent for lead generation.
• The platform's self-hosting option requires technical resources for setup and maintenance. This can be a drawback for some teams, unlike Floworks, a SaaS platform that manages all infrastructure.
• It requires custom workflow creation to qualify inbound leads and book meetings. This contrasts with Floworks, which offers a pre-configured agent dedicated to this specific task.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

User reviews indicate Floworks costs over $200 per month. In contrast, n8n offers a free self-hosted version and paid cloud plans starting at €20 per month, making it a more cost-effective option for teams that build their own workflows. For the most up-to-date pricing, visit n8n's official website.

Consider 11x for Sales Automation

The alternatives reviewed offer broad automation capabilities. If your goal is a dedicated sales solution with digital workers, 11x is a focused option. Its agents handle specific sales tasks from prospect discovery to CRM management. See if it fits your team's needs.

With 11x, we use AI to run your sales playbook. Alice finds accounts, enriches data, and handles outreach. Julian qualifies inbound leads and schedules meetings. The platform combines intent signals and email warmup, replacing the need for separate tools.

Book a demo to see how it works.

6) Pipedream

Pipedream is an integration platform designed for developers to connect APIs and run workflows based on events. For sales teams, this offers a way to build custom automations with code, connecting all the tools in your sales stack.

You can use it for processes like data syncs between your CRM and other apps, or to trigger specific actions from new lead activity.

Pipedream's Main Features

• Prompts, runs, edits, and deploys AI agents.
• Automates processes that connect APIs using a drag-and-drop and code environment.
• Embeds integrations directly into applications or agents with a single SDK.
• Includes managed queues, data stores, and private networks for workflow creation.

How Pipedream Compares to Floworks

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 15 G2 reviews.

• Pipedream provides a code-level environment for developers to build custom automations. This offers more flexibility compared to the pre-configured sales agents in Floworks.
• It connects with over 2,000 applications, which gives it a much broader integration scope than Floworks' focus on specific sales tools.
• The platform allows developers to embed integrations directly into their own applications using an SDK. Floworks does not offer this level of embeddable functionality.
• This tool includes managed infrastructure like data stores and private networks to create complex workflows. This differs from Floworks, which manages infrastructure without direct user control.

Where Pipedream Falls Short Compared to Floworks

• Pipedream requires developers to build custom sales workflows. This process can take more time compared to using the pre-built sales agents in Floworks for specific tasks like outreach.
• The platform lacks native sales features such as an email warmup tool. Unlike Floworks, users must connect separate services for these functions, which can add complexity.
• This tool does not include a function to find new prospects. It automates processes between your current apps, while Floworks has a dedicated agent for lead generation.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

User reviews indicate Floworks is priced slightly above $200 per month. Pipedream's pricing details are not publicly available, so a direct cost comparison is not possible. For the most accurate information, we recommend visiting Pipedream's official website.

7) IFTTT

IFTTT connects different applications and devices. The platform uses conditional statements, called Applets, to automate tasks. An event in one service triggers an action in another. For sales, this can automate simple workflows.

For example, you can create a Trello card from a new Gmail message or save new email attachments to Google Drive. The tool helps manage repetitive tasks between different services without manual input.

IFTTT's Main Features

• Offers pre-built automations, called Applets, that users can enable with a single click.
• Provides advanced automation controls, including filter code, queries, and multi-step Applets.
• Includes full-featured mobile apps for iOS and Android to manage automations.
• Integrates an AI content creator to automatically generate blog and social media posts.

How IFTTT Compares To Floworks

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 113 G2 reviews.

• IFTTT offers a simple interface with a step-by-step wizard for easy setup. This is different from Floworks, which some users report has a learning curve.
• It provides robust mobile apps for iOS and Android. This gives users control over automations on the go, a function not central to the Floworks platform.
• The platform connects a wide range of applications and personal devices. This contrasts with Floworks, which concentrates on a specific set of B2B sales tools.
• This tool includes an AI content creator for blog and social media posts. This provides a different type of content generation than the hyper-personalized sales emails from Floworks.
• IFTTT has a free plan for a limited number of automations. This provides a different entry point compared to the subscription model of Floworks.

Where IFTTT Falls Short Compared to Floworks

• IFTTT does not have a native function to find new sales prospects. This is different from Floworks, which provides a dedicated agent that finds potential customers for your sales team.
• The platform focuses on simple, one-to-one automations between apps. It lacks the complex logic needed for hyper-personalized email campaigns, a core function of Floworks.
• As a general automation tool, it lacks specialized sales features. For example, users need a separate service for email warmup, which is a built-in part of the Floworks platform.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

User reviews state Floworks costs slightly above $200 per month. In contrast, IFTTT offers a free plan and paid tiers, making it a more cost-effective entry point for simpler automation tasks.

8) Parabola

Parabola is an operations automation platform where teams build data workflows with a drag-and-drop interface. It helps sales operations with tasks like lead routing from various sources. The platform also syncs customer data between a CRM and other applications, which supports data consistency across tools.

Parabola's Main Features

• Extracts and transforms data from sources like PDFs, emails, and spreadsheets.
• Provides an audit trail for tracking workflow changes and activities.
• Includes generative AI for text generation within automated workflows.
• Builds workflows with dependencies to manage complex data processes.

How Parabola Compares to Floworks

Average Review score: 4.9/5 stars based on 33 G2 reviews.

• Parabola extracts and transforms data from sources like PDFs and emails. This is different from Floworks, which focuses on sales outreach automation, not complex data work.
• It includes an audit trail for a full history of workflow changes and activities. This provides process governance not highlighted in Floworks' agent-based system.
• The tool lets you build workflows with dependencies to manage complex data processes. This offers more control over process flow compared to the pre-set functions of Floworks' agents.
• This platform provides generative AI for text generation within its automated workflows. This is a broader function than the hyper-personalized email generation found in Floworks.

Where Parabola Falls Short Compared to Floworks

• Parabola does not have a native function for hyper-personalized email campaigns. This is different from Floworks, which provides this as a core feature for sales outreach.
• The tool does not include a function to find new sales prospects. In contrast, Floworks has a dedicated agent that finds potential customers for your sales team.
• Some sales teams might find the setup for outreach automations takes more time. Floworks offers pre-configured agents for specific sales tasks, which can be faster to deploy.
• It lacks a built-in email warmup tool. Users who need this function must connect a separate service, unlike Floworks where it is part of the platform.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

User reviews state Floworks costs slightly above $200 per month. In contrast, Parabola provides a free plan and paid tiers starting at $20 per month, offering a more scalable entry point for data automation needs compared to Floworks' specialized, higher-cost model.

9) Quickwork

Quickwork is a no-code automation platform that connects business applications to create workflows. It uses real-time triggers and batch processes, with over 1,000 pre-integrated apps available for integrations.

For sales, the tool automates lead management. It also syncs data between a CRM and marketing applications.

Quickwork's Main Features

• Builds enterprise and consumer workflows with over 1,500 pre-integrated apps.
• Publishes APIs and manages conversations, including WhatsApp bot deployment.
• Allows instant changes to live workflows with a drag-and-drop interface.
• Handles high-volume workloads, processing millions of requests per month.

How Quickwork Compares to Floworks

Average Review score: 4.9/5 stars based on 16 G2 reviews.

• Quickwork connects with over 1,500 applications. This offers a much wider range of integration options compared to Floworks' specific focus on sales tools.
• It allows you to make instant changes to live workflows. This provides more flexibility than the pre-configured sales agents in Floworks.
• The platform lets you publish APIs and manage conversations, including WhatsApp bot deployment. This is different from Floworks, which centers on email and LinkedIn outreach for sales.
• This tool handles high-volume workloads with millions of requests per month. This capability addresses potential performance concerns, as some Floworks users report slow loading.

Where Quickwork Falls Short Compared to Floworks

• Quickwork is a general automation platform, so it lacks the deep sales focus of Floworks. It does not have native tools for hyper-personalized email campaigns, a core function of Floworks.
• The tool does not include a function to find new sales prospects. This is different from Floworks, which provides a dedicated agent that finds potential customers for your sales team.
• Some sales teams might find the setup for outreach automations takes more time. Floworks offers pre-configured agents for specific sales tasks, which can be faster to deploy.
• It lacks a built-in email warmup tool. Users who need this function must connect a separate service, unlike Floworks where it is part of the platform.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

User reviews state Floworks costs over $200 per month. Quickwork does not list its pricing publicly, so a direct cost comparison is not possible. For accurate pricing information, we recommend visiting Quickwork's official website.

10) Cyclr

Cyclr is an embedded integration platform for SaaS companies to add native integrations to their products. For sales teams, this means the software they use can connect directly to a CRM or other tools. This removes the need for a separate automation platform to sync data.

Cyclr's Main Features

• Creates and embeds an integration marketplace into a SaaS application.
• Provides a white-labeled platform to launch native integration services.
• Builds integration workflows with a low-code, drag-and-drop toolkit.
• Orchestrates data in transit with advanced scripting functions.

How Cyclr Compares to Floworks

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 76 G2 reviews.

• Cyclr is an embedded platform for SaaS companies to add native integrations to their products. This is different from Floworks, which is a standalone tool for sales teams.
• It offers a white-labeled platform, so a SaaS company can launch its own integration service. Floworks does not provide this, as it is a branded, user-facing product.
• The tool provides a low-code builder for developers to create integration workflows. This contrasts with Floworks, which gives pre-configured agents to sales users.
• Users can orchestrate data with advanced scripting functions. This allows for more technical customization than the set functions of the agents in Floworks.

Where Cyclr Falls Short Compared to Floworks

• Cyclr is a toolkit for developers to add integrations to other software. This is different from Floworks, which is a standalone application that sales teams use directly for their outreach campaigns.
• The platform does not have a native function to find new sales prospects. Floworks provides a dedicated agent that automates the lead generation process for its users.
• This tool does not have built-in features for hyper-personalized sales outreach. Floworks offers this as a core function, while a similar process in Cyclr would need to be built from scratch, which can require development resources.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

User reviews state Floworks costs slightly over $200 per month. Cyclr is priced significantly higher, with plans starting at $1,595 per month. This reflects its different use case as an embedded integration platform for SaaS companies, not a direct sales automation tool.

Which One Should You Go With?

Choosing a Floworks alternative depends on many factors, including your team's specific needs and technical resources. This guide reviewed several options to help you make an informed decision.

If you need a dedicated sales automation solution, 11x provides autonomous agents for tasks like prospecting and lead qualification. The platform combines several sales functions, removing the need for multiple tools and focusing your team on closing deals.