Woodpecker.co Alternatives

Woodpecker.co is a popular tool for cold email outreach. Many users like its simple interface and features that help improve deliverability. For many B2B companies, it is a solid choice for running automated campaigns and getting replies from prospects.

However, some users report that it can be expensive or have limited integrations. This might lead you to look for alternatives. We analyzed the top options based on G2 reviews to help you find the right fit for your needs. Let's get started.

11x: Digital Workers for Sales Outreach

If your team is exploring digital workers for sales efforts, consider 11x. It provides automated assistance for outreach and other sales functions, allowing your team to focus on higher-value activities instead of manual tasks.

11x is a go-to-market platform that uses AI agents to handle the sales process. It includes two main agents: Alice and Julian. Alice finds prospects, conducts outreach on email and LinkedIn, and updates your CRM.

Julian qualifies inbound leads and schedules meetings. The platform combines tools for data enrichment, outreach, and email warmup, replacing several applications in a typical sales stack.

Woodpecker.co Alternatives

Here is a detailed breakdown of top Woodpecker.co alternatives. We compare each tool's pricing, features, and its advantages and drawbacks against Woodpecker.co.

1) Mailshake

Mailshake is a sales engagement platform for multi-channel outreach across email, phone, and LinkedIn. The tool helps teams connect with prospects, book meetings, and generate revenue. It focuses on deliverability and automated follow-ups.

More than 100,000 companies use Mailshake. Its simplicity, templates, and training resources allow new reps to send sequences on their first day. The platform also provides AI-assisted content creation.

Mailshake's Main Features

• Automates LinkedIn connection requests, profile views, and messages for multi-channel sequences.
• Searches and purchases verified prospect email addresses by role, location, or company with a built-in data finder.
• Generates and A/B tests email copy and subject lines using its AI writer, SHAKEspeare.
• Includes a dialer to place cold calls directly from the platform as part of a campaign sequence.

Mailshake vs. Woodpecker.co: Key Differences

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 326 G2 reviews.

• Mailshake provides multi-channel outreach with a built-in phone dialer and LinkedIn automation, while Woodpecker.co focuses primarily on cold email campaigns.
• It includes a native data finder to source verified prospect emails directly within the platform, a feature not offered by Woodpecker.co.
• The platform's AI assistant, SHAKEspeare, helps generate and A/B test email copy, which provides more advanced content support than Woodpecker.co.
• This tool has native integrations with major CRMs like Salesforce and HubSpot, which can be an advantage over Woodpecker.co's more limited integration options.

Mailshake's Drawbacks Compared to Woodpecker.co

• Some users report a learning curve with Mailshake due to its extensive features. In contrast, Woodpecker.co offers a simpler interface that can help new users launch campaigns more quickly.
• The platform's campaign customization options are sometimes less flexible. For example, setting complex conditional logic within email sequences can be more limited than in a tool built specifically for intricate email automation.
• It does not include a native email warm-up feature to prepare new accounts for outreach. Users might need a separate service for this, unlike some dedicated email tools that build this function in.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Both Mailshake and Woodpecker.co offer starter plans at $29 per month. Woodpecker's plan focuses on contacting up to 500 prospects, while Mailshake's starter tier provides one mail account. Mailshake’s higher-tier plans at $59 and $99 support more accounts, making it a potentially more scalable option for growing teams.

2) Reply.io

Reply.io is an AI-powered sales engagement platform for B2B teams. It finds prospects and engages them on email, LinkedIn, and phone to book meetings. Users can run manual outreach or use "Jason AI," an autonomous agent to handle research through schedule creation.

The platform supports outbound sales and inbound lead conversion. It also contains a deliverability suite, data enrichment tools, and unlimited mailbox warm-up.

Reply.io's Main Features

• Deploys an AI agent, Jason AI, to automate prospecting, message generation, and meeting scheduling.
• Combines email, LinkedIn, calls, SMS, and WhatsApp into a single multichannel sequence.
• Uses AI variables to generate unique emails at scale with paragraph-level personalization.
• Includes a deliverability suite with over 30 tools, such as an email health checker and unlimited mailbox warm-up.

How Reply.io Compares to Woodpecker.co

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 1,458 G2 reviews.

• Reply.io provides an AI agent, Jason AI, to automate outreach from prospecting to scheduling meetings, which is a more comprehensive automation feature compared to Woodpecker.co's focus on email sequences.
• The platform combines email, LinkedIn, calls, SMS, and WhatsApp into a single sequence, while Woodpecker.co centers its outreach capabilities mainly on email.
• It includes a full deliverability suite with an email health checker and unlimited mailbox warm-up, offering more built-in support than Woodpecker.co.
• This tool uses AI to create personalized email paragraphs for each prospect, allowing for deeper customization than the standard variables in Woodpecker.co.
• Reply.io offers an AI chat for websites to engage visitors and book meetings directly, a lead capture feature not available in Woodpecker.co.

Reply.io's Drawbacks Compared to Woodpecker.co

• Reply.io's extensive features can introduce a learning curve for new users. In comparison, Woodpecker.co's simpler design allows teams to set up and run email campaigns with less initial training.
• The platform's pricing may be less cost-effective as teams grow. Its multichannel plan is priced higher per user than Woodpecker.co's advanced tiers, which can impact budgets for larger sales teams.
• Its all-in-one platform includes many features beyond email, which might be unnecessary for users who only need a specialized cold outreach tool. Woodpecker.co offers a more focused solution for dedicated email campaigns.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Reply.io offers a free plan, while its paid tiers start at $49 per user per month. Woodpecker.co’s starting plan is lower at $29 per month but is based on prospect volume, making it a cost-effective option for basic outreach. Reply.io's pricing is better suited for teams that need a free entry point or plan to scale with multichannel features. For the most up-to-date pricing, visit Reply.io's official website.

3) Lemlist

Lemlist is a sales engagement platform that lets teams find and contact leads from one place. It has a database with over 450 million contacts and automates outreach on email, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, and phone.

The platform uses AI to create personal messages. It also comes with lemwarm, a tool that helps with email deliverability to keep messages out of spam folders.

Lemlist's Main Features

• Sources leads from a database of over 450 million B2B contacts with advanced filtering options.
• Automates multichannel outreach sequences that combine email, LinkedIn actions, WhatsApp messages, and calls.
• Personalizes messages using an AI that scrapes websites to insert insights and creates dynamic images and landing pages.
• Provides free access to its lemwarm tool for email warm-up and deliverability with each user seat.

How Lemlist Compares to Woodpecker.co

Average Review score: 4.4/5 stars based on 276 G2 reviews.

• Lemlist supports multichannel outreach across email, LinkedIn, calls, and WhatsApp, while Woodpecker.co focuses primarily on email campaigns.
• It includes a database of over 450 million B2B contacts for lead sourcing, a feature not available within Woodpecker.co.
• The platform offers advanced personalization with AI-generated dynamic images and landing pages, providing more customization than Woodpecker.co’s standard variables.
• Each user seat comes with free access to lemwarm, a dedicated tool for email warm-up and deliverability management.

Lemlist's Drawbacks Compared to Woodpecker.co

• Lemlist's broad feature set for multichannel outreach can make the platform feel complex. Teams that only need to run email campaigns may find Woodpecker.co's simpler, more focused interface easier to navigate.
• Its pricing may be less cost-effective for teams that do not use the extra multichannel features. Woodpecker.co's prospect-based pricing can be a more budget-friendly option for purely email-focused outreach.
• Some users report occasional technical issues with features like data enrichment. A more specialized tool like Woodpecker.co, with a narrower feature set, may offer a more stable experience for core email functions.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Lemlist offers a free plan, while Woodpecker starts at $29 per month for 500 prospects. Woodpecker's prospect-based model is cost-effective for targeted campaigns, whereas Lemlist's feature-based tiers better serve users needing multichannel outreach. For detailed pricing, visit Lemlist's official website.

4) Outreach

Outreach is a sales execution platform for market-facing teams. It helps them engage prospects to build pipeline and close deals. The platform automates sales engagement and processes. It also provides sales intelligence to help reps prioritize activities and accounts to secure more meetings.

The system supports a multichannel prospect strategy that includes email. It helps personalize outreach at scale to book more meetings with interested buyers.

Outreach's Main Features

• Deploys AI agents for each stage of the revenue cycle, from prospecting to deal management.
• Provides pipeline and forecast analytics to predict revenue outcomes and run business scenarios.
• Offers AI-driven representative coaching with meeting summaries, Q&A, and performance analytics through Kaia.
• Analyzes buyer sentiment by detecting topics and tones across meetings, calls, and emails.

How Outreach Compares to Woodpecker.co

Average Review score: 4.3/5 stars based on 3,479 G2 reviews.

• Outreach uses AI agents for the full sales cycle, from prospecting to deal management. This is a broader automation scope than Woodpecker.co's focus on email sequences.
• The platform's pipeline and forecast analytics offer strategic business insights. This is more advanced than the campaign-level metrics found in Woodpecker.co.
• It offers AI-driven sales coaching with performance analytics. This is a feature for rep development that Woodpecker.co does not provide.
• This tool analyzes buyer sentiment in calls and emails to understand prospect interest. This offers deeper insights than the standard engagement tracking in Woodpecker.co.

Outreach's Drawbacks Compared to Woodpecker.co

• Its nature as a comprehensive sales platform can introduce complexity for teams that only need a dedicated cold email tool. Woodpecker.co, in comparison, offers a more focused and simpler interface.
• The platform's pricing is often higher, reflecting its enterprise-level features. This might be less cost-effective for smaller teams compared to Woodpecker.co's prospect-based pricing, which scales with campaign size.
• Some users report a significant learning curve and a longer implementation time due to its extensive feature set. Woodpecker.co, with its more straightforward design, often allows teams to launch campaigns more quickly.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Outreach pricing is available by quote, a common model for enterprise platforms. In contrast, Woodpecker.co offers a transparent starting price of $29 per month. For a custom quote, visit Outreach's official website.

5) Salesloft

Salesloft is a sales engagement platform that helps revenue teams with the complete sales workflow. It provides tools to engage customers, manage deals, and get revenue insights. The platform supports multichannel outreach, which includes email, to help sellers build pipeline and improve sales results.

Salesloft's Main Features

• Provides deal and pipeline management with AI insights into risk, next steps, and velocity.
• Analyzes recorded calls to provide buyer and seller insights for coaching and performance improvement.
• Uses an AI prioritization engine called Rhythm that recommends the right actions at the right moments.
• Deploys AI chat agents to engage website visitors with real-time, personalized conversations.

How Salesloft Compares to Woodpecker.co

Average Review score: 4.5/5 stars based on 4,145 G2 reviews.

• Salesloft provides deal and pipeline management with AI insights to identify risk and next steps. This offers a broader view of the sales cycle compared to Woodpecker.co's focus on email outreach.
• The platform analyzes recorded calls to provide insights for sales coaching and performance improvement. Woodpecker.co, as an email-centric tool, does not offer this level of representative development.
• It uses an AI engine called Rhythm to guide sellers on the next best action for each prospect. This is a more advanced feature than the standard campaign scheduling in Woodpecker.co.
• This tool deploys AI chat agents to engage website visitors in real-time conversations. This adds an inbound lead capture channel not available in Woodpecker.co.
• Its sales forecasting and revenue intelligence capabilities provide business-level predictions, which is different from Woodpecker.co's campaign-specific analytics.

Salesloft's Drawbacks Compared to Woodpecker.co

• Salesloft's comprehensive platform can be complex for teams that only need a dedicated email tool. In comparison, Woodpecker.co provides a simpler interface, which may allow for a faster campaign setup.
• Its pricing is often higher to reflect its enterprise-level features. This might be less cost-effective for smaller teams than Woodpecker.co's prospect-based pricing, which scales with campaign size.
• Some users report occasional technical issues with email functions. A specialized tool like Woodpecker.co, with a narrower focus on deliverability, may offer a more stable experience for core email tasks.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Salesloft provides pricing by quote, which is typical for enterprise-focused platforms. This contrasts with Woodpecker.co's transparent pricing, which starts at $29 per month. For a custom quote, you can visit Salesloft's official website.

Consider 11x for Sales Automation

If your sales efforts could benefit from digital workers, 11x offers a platform to automate outreach and other sales functions. This approach lets your team concentrate on revenue-generating activities. Learn more about how 11x can help your organization.

At 11x, we run your sales playbook with AI. Alice finds accounts, enriches their data, and handles outreach. Julian manages calls, qualifies prospects, and books meetings. The platform combines data enrichment and email warmup, replacing many tools in a traditional GTM stack.

Book a demo to see the platform in action.

6) Klenty

Klenty is a sales engagement platform that helps sales teams contact prospects. It automates outreach sequences across email, LinkedIn, and phone. Teams use the tool for outbound campaigns and to follow up with inbound leads.

The platform's goal is to help reps book more meetings. It provides a structure for personalized communication and consistent follow-up to build a sales pipeline.

Klenty's Main Features

• Orchestrates outreach across email, calls, SMS, WhatsApp, and LinkedIn from a single cadence builder.
• Includes a sales dialer with parallel dialing for up to five numbers at once and a power dialer for sequential list dialing.
• Deploys an autonomous AI SDR that researches accounts, creates outreach, and books meetings.
• Provides real-time coaching during cold calls with AI talk-track tables to enforce methodology.

How Klenty Compares to Woodpecker.co

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 387 G2 reviews.

• Klenty orchestrates outreach across email, calls, SMS, and LinkedIn, providing more channels for engagement compared to Woodpecker.co, which focuses mainly on email.
• It includes a sales dialer with parallel and power dialing functions. This allows reps to make calls directly from the platform, a feature not available in Woodpecker.co.
• The platform deploys an autonomous AI SDR to handle tasks from research to booking meetings, offering more comprehensive automation than Woodpecker.co's email sequence tools.
• This tool provides real-time AI coaching during cold calls to help with representative development, a capability outside the scope of Woodpecker.co's email-centric platform.

Klenty's Drawbacks Compared to Woodpecker.co

• Klenty's broad feature set sometimes creates a learning curve for teams. Woodpecker.co provides a simpler interface focused on email, which helps users launch campaigns faster.
• The tool's pricing structure is designed for teams that use its full multichannel capabilities. For users who only need email outreach, Woodpecker.co's prospect-based pricing can be a more cost-effective choice.
• Some users report occasional performance lags or sync delays with Klenty. A specialized tool like Woodpecker.co, with a narrower focus, may provide a more stable experience for core email automation tasks.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Klenty's Startup plan is $50 per user per month, while Woodpecker.co starts at $29 for 500 prospects. Woodpecker.co's model is more cost-effective for targeted email campaigns, while Klenty's per-user pricing suits teams needing multichannel features. For detailed pricing, visit Klenty's official website.

7) GMass

GMass is an email platform that operates inside Gmail. It allows users to send cold email and marketing campaigns with mail merge directly from a Google account. This makes it an option for teams that want to manage outreach without a separate application.

GMass's Main Features

• Breaks Gmail’s daily sending limits using proprietary distribution technology.
• Connects to Google Sheets for mail merge and automatically sends emails as new rows are added.
• Builds email lists by scraping addresses from existing conversations within a user's Gmail account.
• Embeds one-question polls directly inside email campaigns.

How GMass Compares to Woodpecker.co

Average Review score: 4.8/5 stars based on 1,206 G2 reviews.

• GMass operates directly inside a user's Gmail account, which is different from Woodpecker.co, a standalone application that requires switching between platforms.
• The tool uses its own technology to send more emails than Gmail's standard daily limits, offering a different way to scale campaigns compared to Woodpecker.co.
• It connects directly to Google Sheets for mail merges. This provides a more direct workflow for users who manage prospect lists in Sheets than Woodpecker.co's import functions.
• This platform can build an email list by searching a user's Gmail inbox, a unique contact sourcing method not found in Woodpecker.co.
• GMass allows users to embed simple one-question polls in emails, adding an interactive element that is not a native feature in Woodpecker.co.

GMass's Drawbacks Compared to Woodpecker.co

• GMass operates exclusively within the Gmail interface. This can be a limitation for teams that prefer a separate application to manage outreach, which is what Woodpecker.co provides.
• Its campaign management options are less advanced. For instance, creating sequences with complex conditional logic is a feature more developed in a specialized tool like Woodpecker.co.
• The tool's integrations focus on the Google ecosystem, such as Google Sheets. In contrast, Woodpecker.co offers a wider range of native CRM integrations that may better suit complex sales workflows.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Woodpecker.co's pricing starts at $29 per month for 500 prospects, offering a predictable cost for targeted campaigns. GMass does not list its pricing publicly, as its plans are designed for users working within Gmail. For the most accurate pricing, visit the official GMass website.

8) Mixmax

Mixmax is a sales engagement platform that works inside Gmail. It helps sales teams manage outreach with features like email tracking, scheduling, and automation. The tool is designed for reps who want to handle their workflow without leaving their inbox.

Mixmax's Main Features

• Provides one-click meeting scheduling directly within emails to reduce back-and-forth communication.
• Tracks email opens, clicks, and downloads in real-time, with notifications for prospect activity.
• Automates multi-channel sequences that combine email, phone calls, and LinkedIn tasks.
• Embeds polls and surveys directly into emails to increase engagement and gather feedback.

How Mixmax Compares to Woodpecker.co

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 1,277 G2 reviews.

• Mixmax operates within the Gmail interface, while Woodpecker.co is a standalone application that requires users to switch between platforms.
• It offers one-click meeting scheduling directly in emails, a more integrated feature than Woodpecker.co's calendar functions.
• The platform includes a sidebar that shows prospect activity and CRM data inside the inbox, providing more context than Woodpecker.co's campaign reports.
• This tool supports interactive polls and surveys within emails, an engagement feature not natively available in Woodpecker.co.

Mixmax's Drawbacks Compared to Woodpecker.co

• Mixmax's reliance on Gmail can be a limitation for teams that do not use Google Workspace. Woodpecker.co is platform-agnostic and works with various email providers.
• The in-Gmail interface may feel cluttered for some users. A separate application like Woodpecker.co can provide a more focused environment for managing campaigns.
• Its feature set is broad, which might be unnecessary for teams that only need a specialized cold email tool. Woodpecker.co offers a more streamlined solution for this purpose.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Mixmax offers a free plan, with paid tiers starting at $29 per user per month. Woodpecker.co also starts at $29 but bases its pricing on prospect volume. Mixmax's per-user model is suited for individual reps, while Woodpecker.co can be more cost-effective for targeted campaigns.

Mixmax is a sales engagement platform that works inside Gmail. It helps sales teams manage outreach with automation, email activity reports, and one-click meeting setup. Reps can handle their entire workflow from their inbox, without the need for a separate application.

Mixmax's Main Features

• It tracks prospect activity with email attachments and provides insight into content performance.
• The platform includes task management tools to help reps organize sales activities within their workflow.
• It offers integrated workflow management and performance analytics to measure and refine sales processes.
• The system provides content management functions to organize and share sales templates and collateral.

How Mixmax Compares To Woodpecker.co

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 1,433 G2 reviews.

• Mixmax operates directly within the Gmail interface, which allows reps to work from their inbox. This is different from Woodpecker.co, a standalone application that requires a separate tab or window.
• It lets users add interactive polls and surveys to emails. This provides an engagement option that Woodpecker.co does not offer natively.
• The platform provides one-click meeting scheduling from inside an email. This can reduce back-and-forth communication compared to the standard calendar integrations in Woodpecker.co.
• This tool tracks engagement with email attachments to show how prospects interact with sent content. This offers more specific insight than the general open and click tracking in Woodpecker.co.

Mixmax's Drawbacks Compared To Woodpecker.co

• Mixmax works only inside Gmail, which limits teams that use other email providers like Outlook. In contrast, Woodpecker.co connects to different email services, which offers more flexibility for diverse tech stacks.
• Some users find that the tool adds many features directly into the Gmail interface, which can feel cluttered. Woodpecker.co provides a separate, dedicated application that can offer a more focused workspace for managing email campaigns.
• It does not have a native email warm-up feature to prepare new accounts for outreach. Woodpecker.co includes deliverability tools, so users might not need a separate service to ensure emails land in the inbox.
• The platform's campaign options are sometimes less flexible for complex tests. For example, Woodpecker.co offers more advanced A/B testing for different parts of an email, which helps users optimize campaign performance more deeply.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Mixmax's paid plans start at $29 per user per month, with its Growth plan at $49. Woodpecker.co also starts at $29 but for 500 prospects. Woodpecker's prospect-based model suits targeted campaigns, while Mixmax's per-user pricing is better for reps with high contact volumes.

9) Snov.io

Snov.io is a sales automation platform for lead generation and outreach. It offers an email finder, verifier, and drip campaign sender in one system. This allows teams to find prospects and manage email sequences from a single dashboard.

Snov.io's Main Features

• Finds and verifies email addresses from company domains, LinkedIn profiles, and other sources.
• Automates email drip campaigns with personalization, triggers, and schedule options.
• Includes a free sales CRM to manage leads and deals without a separate tool.
• Identifies the technology stack used on a company's website for more targeted outreach.

How Snov.io Compares to Woodpecker.co

• Snov.io includes a built-in email finder and verifier, which requires a separate tool for Woodpecker.co users.
• The platform offers a free, integrated sales CRM, while Woodpecker.co focuses on outreach and connects with external CRMs.
• Snov.io provides a technology checker to identify a prospect's tech stack, a feature not available in Woodpecker.co.
• Woodpecker.co offers more advanced deliverability features, while Snov.io is positioned as an all-in-one prospecting and outreach tool.

Snov.io's Drawbacks Compared to Woodpecker.co

• As an all-in-one platform, some of Snov.io's features may be less specialized than Woodpecker.co's dedicated email outreach tools.
• Users sometimes report variability in the accuracy of the email finder, which might necessitate additional verification.
• Woodpecker.co's focus on email deliverability and warm-up can be more robust for users whose primary concern is inbox placement.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Snov.io uses a credit-based system for its plans, which cover lead generation and email campaigns. Woodpecker.co's pricing is based on prospect volume. Snov.io can be more cost-effective for teams that need an all-in-one tool, while Woodpecker.co's model suits targeted email campaigns.

Snov.io is a sales automation platform that combines lead generation with outreach tools. It has an email finder, a verifier, and a drip campaign sender in one system. The platform also includes a free sales CRM to manage leads and deals from a single dashboard.

Snov.io's Main Features

• Manages sales opportunities and pipelines.
• Provides industry research data on contacts and companies.
• Offers reporting and analytics with visual dashboards.
• Includes tools for task and activity management.

How Snov.io Compares To Woodpecker.co

Average Review score: 4.6/5 stars based on 450 G2 reviews.

• Snov.io includes opportunity and pipeline management tools to track deals. This differs from Woodpecker.co, which focuses on top-of-funnel email outreach.
• It provides industry research data on contacts and companies. This feature gives more context for personalization than the standard variables available in Woodpecker.co.
• The platform offers visual dashboards for reports and analytics. This provides a broader view of sales performance compared to Woodpecker.co's campaign-specific metrics.
• This tool comes with task and activity management features. These help reps organize their entire sales workflow, while Woodpecker.co centers on the automation of email sequences.

Snov.io's Drawbacks Compared To Woodpecker.co

• As an all-in-one platform, Snov.io's deliverability features may be less specialized. In contrast, Woodpecker.co provides more advanced, dedicated tools for email warm-up, which can be a key difference for large campaigns.
• Its A/B testing capabilities are sometimes less flexible than those in Woodpecker.co. Woodpecker.co allows for more complex tests on different email components, which helps with deeper campaign optimization.
• For teams that only need email outreach, the platform's broad feature set can feel less focused. Woodpecker.co provides a more streamlined experience specifically for cold email, which can be easier for teams with a narrow focus.
• Some users report that the accuracy of the built-in email finder can vary. This might require an extra verification step, unlike Woodpecker.co, which integrates with dedicated data providers for potentially more consistent results.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Snov.io's Starter plan is $39 per month, while Woodpecker.co begins at $29 for 500 prospects. Woodpecker's prospect-based model is cost-effective for targeted email outreach. Snov.io's plans, including a Pro tier at $99, bundle more tools, offering better value for teams needing an all-in-one system.

10) Apollo.io

Apollo.io is a sales intelligence and engagement platform. It gives access to a database of contacts and companies to find prospects. The system helps sales teams build lead lists and launch outreach sequences across multiple channels.

It combines data and workflow tools into a single interface and provides analytics to measure campaign performance.

Apollo.io's Main Features

• Accesses a B2B database with over 210 million contacts and 35 million companies.
• Enriches and validates lead information to ensure data quality and accuracy.
• Searches the database to find new customers and build targeted lead lists.
• Provides industry research data to help with targeted outreach strategies.

How Apollo.io Compares To Woodpecker.co

Average Review score: 4.7/5 stars based on 8,904 G2 reviews.

• Apollo.io includes a B2B database with over 210 million contacts, allowing users to find prospects within the platform. This is different from Woodpecker.co, which requires external tools for lead sourcing.
• The platform combines lead sourcing, data enrichment, and multichannel outreach in one system. In comparison, Woodpecker.co focuses on email campaign automation and integrates with other tools for data functions.
• It provides lead intelligence features like buyer intent data to help prioritize outreach efforts. Woodpecker.co's analytics center more on email engagement metrics such as opens and clicks.
• This tool uses AI to assist with the entire sales process, from prospecting to deal management. This offers a wider range of automation compared to Woodpecker.co, which concentrates its features on automating email sequences.

Apollo.io's Drawbacks Compared To Woodpecker.co

• Apollo.io's all-in-one platform can be complex for teams that only need a dedicated email tool. In comparison, Woodpecker.co provides a more focused interface, which might allow for a quicker campaign launch.
• Its deliverability features are part of a larger system. Woodpecker.co, as a specialized tool, offers more dedicated functions for email warm-up, which can be important for users focused on inbox placement.
• Some users report that the contact data in Apollo.io's database can sometimes be inaccurate, which may require an extra verification step. Woodpecker.co integrates with specialized data providers for potentially more consistent results.
• The platform's A/B testing options are sometimes less flexible for detailed experiments. In contrast, Woodpecker.co allows for more advanced tests on different email components, which helps with deeper campaign optimization.

Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness

Apollo.io offers a free plan, while its paid plans start at $49 per user per month. In contrast, Woodpecker.co's pricing begins at $29 per month for 500 prospects. Woodpecker's prospect-based model can be more cost-effective for targeted email campaigns, whereas Apollo's per-user pricing is suited for teams needing an all-in-one platform.

Which One Should You Go With?

Many variables influence the choice of a Woodpecker.co alternative. This guide analyzed several options to help you find the right fit for your business needs.

If you are considering sales automation, 11x provides digital workers to run your sales playbook. Its AI agents handle outreach and other functions, allowing your team to focus on higher-value activities.