Top 5 Relevance AI Alternatives (2025)

We tested 5 AI agent platforms to replace manual GTM work.

Only one turned pipeline into reality.

‍

Why we staged the teardown

Everyone’s talking about AI agents. And Relevance AI is leading the charge, promising no-code workforces that can research, reason, and execute tasks without engineering support.

It’s a compelling vision: replace brittle workflows with adaptive digital coworkers.

But here’s the problem:
Most platforms hand you a blank canvas, not a ready teammate. You're still writing prompts. Still stitching APIs. Still stuck in build mode while buyers move on.

So we ran a 14-day sprint across the top “agent-based” automation platforms—real leads, real CRM, live domains. The goal: Replace SDR workflows with autonomous execution.

‍

Platforms Tested

• 11x (Alice + Julian): GTM-ready Digital Workers for outbound + inbound execution across every channel.
• Relevance AI: Build custom no-code AI agents to automate business workflows.
• Dust.tt: Deploy collaborative AI agents for internal research + ops.
• LangChain + LangSmith: Agent framework + LLM observability layer (dev required).
• Akkio: Predictive analytics and workflow automation with no code.
• Axiom.ai: Visual automation for browser-based workflows.

What We Measured

• Speed-to-action: Do the agents respond immediately to buying signals (e.g. inbound demo forms)?
• Multi-channel fluency: Can the system engage across email, phone, SMS, WhatsApp, LinkedIn—out of the box?
• Pipeline output: Are we seeing real replies, booked meetings, and qualified interest?
• Setup drag: How many hours of prompt design, API wiring, or onboarding does this require?
• Maintenance load: Can RevOps hand this off—or will it collapse if the original builder leaves?
• Security & trust: Is the platform audit-ready for SOC2, GDPR, and enterprise compliance?

High-level result: 11x did the job. The rest handed us tools.

Across every metric that mattered—pipeline velocity, accuracy, channel coverage, CRM logging—11x was the only platform that replaced labor with outcomes. No flows to design. No prompts to iterate. Just results.

‍

Inside a week with Alice & Julian (11x)

Day-zero onboarding

• 14:00 UTC – CSV uploaded.
  
  
• 14:02 – Alice dedupes against HubSpot, enriches with 17+ signals, prioritizes ICPs.
  
  
• 14:05 – Domain warming, subdomain health checks, CRM sync.
  
  
• 14:06 – First batch of personalized, signal-informed outbound leaves across email, LinkedIn, and SMS.
  No builders. No blocks. No sandbox.
  
  

Live inbound, sub-20 seconds

• 03:17 local time: an ICP completes the demo form.
• 03:17:17: Julian calls, confirms fit, logs the conversation, sends SMS follow-up, and drops a calendar invite on the AE’s calendar.
• CRM updated, Slack alert triggered, lead routed.

Channel coverage + personalization

Alice switched from email to WhatsApp mid-sequence after open tracking dipped. She rewrote messaging on the fly after a funding signal appeared.
Julian followed up via voice + SMS post-call, logging tone, objections, and next steps.

→ Multichannel orchestration and real-time decision-making without human input.

‍

Where agent platforms fell short

• Relevance AI – No email deliverability system or native sending
• Dust.tt – No CRM engagement, outbound logic, or sales focus
• LangChain + LangSmith – Best for AI engineers, not GTM operators
• Akkio – Not agent-based; no outbound engagement
• Axiom.ai – No outbound orchestration or personalization

‍

Runner-up reviews (strengths & gaps)

2. Dust.tt 

Strengths

• Beautifully designed interface for building internal-facing AI workflows—especially useful for knowledge work, summaries, and internal chat.
• Strong integrations with Notion, Slack, and other internal tools make it a great fit for async teams and documentation-heavy workflows.
• Flexible for use cases like RFP drafting, customer support triage, and sales Q&A assistants.

Gaps

• Not focused on GTM execution: no native CRM integration, no outbound messaging, and no meeting-booking flows.
• Lacks multi-channel communication capabilities—no SMS, WhatsApp, or calling support.
• Agents are more collaborative than autonomous; most require a human in the loop to approve, confirm, or steer direction.

Dust.tt excels at internal enablement—but it’s not built to drive pipeline on its own.

‍

3. LangChain + LangSmith 

Strengths

• Developer-first, open-source framework with full control over LLMs, memory, chains, and tooling.
• LangSmith adds observability, tracing, dataset testing, and evaluation tools—perfect for high-stakes AI workflows.
• Full flexibility over agent behavior, architecture, and performance tuning—ideal for AI infrastructure teams.

Gaps

• Requires an engineering team to build, deploy, and maintain—no UI or prebuilt agents for GTM use cases.
• Cost of implementation rises quickly with scale (e.g. managing APIs, hosting vector DBs, running inference infra).
• Long iteration cycles to get agents production-ready in sales contexts (e.g. call flows, CRM handoff).

LangChain gives you the deepest customization—but zero turnkey outcomes. You're building infrastructure, not booking meetings.

‍

4. Akkio

Strengths

• Fast and intuitive interface for building predictive models (e.g. lead scoring, churn prediction) using spreadsheet-level inputs.
• Ideal for marketers, data analysts, or ops teams who want to apply ML without touching code.
• Seamless integration into Zapier, HubSpot, Google Sheets, and more—great for teams already living in those tools.

Gaps

• Not an agent platform—Akkio doesn’t support autonomous workflows, multi-step reasoning, or outbound execution.
• No native channel communication support (email, SMS, etc.)—all outreach still needs to be wired separately.
• Doesn’t qualify or route inbound interest; better at surfacing signals than acting on them.

Akkio is a great add-on for forecasting or prioritization, but it’s not a sales engine.

‍

5. Axiom.ai 

Strengths

• Capture any browser workflow (export lists from Sales Nav, push data to Google Sheets, click through web apps) without writing code.
• Bots can run on Axiom’s servers every hour, day, or via webhook—no local machine needed.
• Native actions for Airtable, Google Sheets, CSV, and Zapier/webhooks make it easy to hand results to downstream tools.
• Free tier for light jobs; Pro plans (≈ $50–$150 / mo) undercut full RPA suites.
• Bulk contact enrichment, website scraping, repetitive CRM data moves, QA checks, etc.

Gaps

• Axiom automates clicks, not conversations. It can’t draft emails, qualify leads, or adapt content on the fly.
• Anything off-browser (phone calls, inbox deliverability, SMS, WhatsApp) requires separate tooling.
• It can push rows into HubSpot/SFDC via APIs, but there’s no built-in lead routing or meeting booking.
• Heavy jobs (thousands of pages, parallel threads) consume run credits fast; enterprise-grade concurrency isn’t its focus.
• Great for SMB ops, but lacks the SOC 2 / ISO framework large GTM orgs need for customer data.

Axiom.ai is perfect for automating click-heavy web chores, but teams hunting for an autonomous revenue engine will still need a separate, AI-driven SDR layer.

‍

Stop building agents. Hire better teammates.

Relevance and friends are exciting if you want to build a new system.
But if you need qualified meetings, real conversations, and 24/7 pipeline execution, you don’t need a platform. You need Alice and Julian.

11x gives you:

• +30% more meetings per AE
• 105+ languages covered
• <20 second response to inbound
• $100M+ in pipeline booked
  
  

All logged, routed, and closed—without touching a workflow builder.

‍

Ready to run your own teardown?

Upload your list. Point your form at Julian. Watch what happens.

Book your live demo of Alice or Julian

No slide decks, just results.